Snap Decisions: Assessing Participation and Data Quality in a Citizen Science Program Using Repeat Photography

IF 2.3 Q1 Multidisciplinary Citizen Science Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-10 DOI:10.5334/cstp.558
Veronica Flowers, Chelsea Frutos, Alistair S. MacKenzie, Richard Fanning, Erin E. Fraser
{"title":"Snap Decisions: Assessing Participation and Data Quality in a Citizen Science Program Using Repeat Photography","authors":"Veronica Flowers, Chelsea Frutos, Alistair S. MacKenzie, Richard Fanning, Erin E. Fraser","doi":"10.5334/cstp.558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Photo-point monitoring through repeat photography allows assessment of long-term ecosystem changes, and photos may be collected using citizen science methods. Such efforts can generate large photo collections, but are susceptible to varying participation and data quality. To date, there have been few assessments of the success of citizen science projects using repeat photography methods in meeting their objectives. We report on the success of the PhotoMon Project, a photo-point monitoring program at Pinery Provincial Park, Canada, at meeting its primary goals of affordably collecting seasonal reference photographs of significant ecosystems within the park, while providing a stewardship opportunity for park visitors. We investigated how the quantity of submitted photos varied over time (quantity), and how closely those photos matched the suite of criteria of the PhotoMon Project (quality). Photo submissions occurred year-round and at all sites, although a low proportion of park visitors participated in the program. Photo quantity varied among sites and seasonally, reaching a low during the winter, but with proportional participation in the project lowest in summer. Photo quality was consistent year-round, with most photos meeting most program criteria. Common issues with photo quality included photo lighting and orientation. We conclude that the program met its scientific goal of compiling seasonal reference photos, but that comparatively few park visitors engage in the program. We suggest changes to increase visitor motivation to participate, but recognize that these may compromise the program’s current affordability and ease of management.","PeriodicalId":32270,"journal":{"name":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","volume":"121 46","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen Science Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Photo-point monitoring through repeat photography allows assessment of long-term ecosystem changes, and photos may be collected using citizen science methods. Such efforts can generate large photo collections, but are susceptible to varying participation and data quality. To date, there have been few assessments of the success of citizen science projects using repeat photography methods in meeting their objectives. We report on the success of the PhotoMon Project, a photo-point monitoring program at Pinery Provincial Park, Canada, at meeting its primary goals of affordably collecting seasonal reference photographs of significant ecosystems within the park, while providing a stewardship opportunity for park visitors. We investigated how the quantity of submitted photos varied over time (quantity), and how closely those photos matched the suite of criteria of the PhotoMon Project (quality). Photo submissions occurred year-round and at all sites, although a low proportion of park visitors participated in the program. Photo quantity varied among sites and seasonally, reaching a low during the winter, but with proportional participation in the project lowest in summer. Photo quality was consistent year-round, with most photos meeting most program criteria. Common issues with photo quality included photo lighting and orientation. We conclude that the program met its scientific goal of compiling seasonal reference photos, but that comparatively few park visitors engage in the program. We suggest changes to increase visitor motivation to participate, but recognize that these may compromise the program’s current affordability and ease of management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速决策:使用重复摄影评估公民科学项目的参与和数据质量
通过重复拍摄的照片点监测可以评估长期的生态系统变化,并且可以使用公民科学方法收集照片。这样的努力可以产生大量的照片集合,但容易受到不同参与和数据质量的影响。迄今为止,很少有使用重复摄影方法来评估公民科学项目在实现其目标方面的成功。我们报告了PhotoMon项目的成功,这是加拿大Pinery省立公园的一个照片点监测项目,它实现了其主要目标,即以可负担得起的价格收集公园内重要生态系统的季节性参考照片,同时为公园游客提供了一个管理机会。我们调查了提交的照片数量如何随时间变化(数量),以及这些照片与PhotoMon项目的标准套件(质量)的匹配程度。尽管参与该项目的公园游客比例很低,但所有景点全年都可以提交照片。照片数量因地点和季节而异,冬季达到最低,但夏季项目的比例参与率最低。照片质量全年保持一致,大多数照片符合大多数项目标准。照片质量的常见问题包括照片照明和方向。我们得出的结论是,该计划达到了编制季节性参考照片的科学目标,但参与该计划的公园游客相对较少。我们建议做出改变,以增加游客参与的动机,但认识到这些可能会损害该计划目前的可负担性和管理的便利性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Citizen Science Theory and Practice
Citizen Science Theory and Practice Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Snap Decisions: Assessing Participation and Data Quality in a Citizen Science Program Using Repeat Photography Diversifying Large-Scale Participatory Science: The Efficacy of Engagement through Facilitator Organizations “Every Small Action Helps Towards the Greater Cause:” Online Communities Scaling Up Online Community-Led Citizen Science in Addressing Litter Challenges in Scotland Cross-Project Analysis of Volunteers’ Scientific Observation Skills Citizen Scientist Participation in Research on Private Lands Positively Impacts Multiple Conservation Behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1