Multi-institutional exploration of pediatric residents' perspectives on anti-racism curricula: a qualitative study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2474134
Jessica Martin, Rebecca Johnson, Lahia Yemane, Ndidi Unaka, Chineze Ebo, Jessica Hippolyte, Margaret Jones, Monique Quinn, Aisha Barber, Baraka Floyd, Rebecca Blankenburg, Sarah L Hilgenberg
{"title":"Multi-institutional exploration of pediatric residents' perspectives on anti-racism curricula: a qualitative study.","authors":"Jessica Martin, Rebecca Johnson, Lahia Yemane, Ndidi Unaka, Chineze Ebo, Jessica Hippolyte, Margaret Jones, Monique Quinn, Aisha Barber, Baraka Floyd, Rebecca Blankenburg, Sarah L Hilgenberg","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2474134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anti-racism curricula are increasingly being recognized as an integral component of medical education. To our knowledge, there has not yet been a publication exploring resident perspectives from multiple institutions and explicitly representing both underrepresented in medicine (UIM) and non-UIM perspectives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore and compare UIM and non-UIM pediatric residents' perspectives on the content and qualities of meaningful anti-racism curricula.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an IRB-approved multi-institutional, qualitative study that incorporated Sotto-Santiago et al's conceptual framework for anti-racism education. Between February and May 2021, we conducted focus groups of UIM and non-UIM pediatric residents at three large residency programs in the United States. We developed focus group guides using literature review, expert consensus, feedback from study team racial equity experts, and piloting. Focus groups were conducted virtually, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We employed thematic analysis to code transcripts, create categories, and develop themes until we reached thematic sufficiency. We completed member checking to ensure trustworthiness of themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty residents participated (19 UIM and 21 non-UIM) in a total of six focus groups. We identified 7 themes, summarized as: 1) racism in medicine is pervasive, therefore (2) anti-racism education is critical to the development of competent physicians, and 3) education should extend to all healthcare providers. 4) Residents desired education focused on action-oriented strategies to advance anti-racism, 5) taught by those with both learned and lived experiences with racism, 6) in a psychologically safe space for UIM residents, and 7) with adequate time and financial resources for successful implementation and engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our multi-institutional study affirms the need for pediatric resident anti-racism education, promotes co-creation as a method to affect culture change, and provides practical strategies for curricular design and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2474134"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11892060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2474134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anti-racism curricula are increasingly being recognized as an integral component of medical education. To our knowledge, there has not yet been a publication exploring resident perspectives from multiple institutions and explicitly representing both underrepresented in medicine (UIM) and non-UIM perspectives.

Objective: To explore and compare UIM and non-UIM pediatric residents' perspectives on the content and qualities of meaningful anti-racism curricula.

Methods: We performed an IRB-approved multi-institutional, qualitative study that incorporated Sotto-Santiago et al's conceptual framework for anti-racism education. Between February and May 2021, we conducted focus groups of UIM and non-UIM pediatric residents at three large residency programs in the United States. We developed focus group guides using literature review, expert consensus, feedback from study team racial equity experts, and piloting. Focus groups were conducted virtually, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. We employed thematic analysis to code transcripts, create categories, and develop themes until we reached thematic sufficiency. We completed member checking to ensure trustworthiness of themes.

Results: Forty residents participated (19 UIM and 21 non-UIM) in a total of six focus groups. We identified 7 themes, summarized as: 1) racism in medicine is pervasive, therefore (2) anti-racism education is critical to the development of competent physicians, and 3) education should extend to all healthcare providers. 4) Residents desired education focused on action-oriented strategies to advance anti-racism, 5) taught by those with both learned and lived experiences with racism, 6) in a psychologically safe space for UIM residents, and 7) with adequate time and financial resources for successful implementation and engagement.

Conclusion: Our multi-institutional study affirms the need for pediatric resident anti-racism education, promotes co-creation as a method to affect culture change, and provides practical strategies for curricular design and implementation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科住院医师对反种族主义课程的多机构探讨:一项质性研究。
背景:反种族主义课程日益被认为是医学教育的一个组成部分。据我们所知,目前还没有一篇出版物探讨了来自多个机构的住院医生的观点,并明确地代表了医学(UIM)和非UIM的观点。目的:探讨和比较医科大学与非医科大学儿科住院医师对有意义的反种族主义课程内容和质量的看法。方法:我们进行了一项irb批准的多机构定性研究,该研究纳入了Sotto-Santiago等人的反种族主义教育概念框架。在2021年2月至5月期间,我们在美国的三个大型住院医师项目中对UIM和非UIM儿科住院医师进行了焦点小组讨论。我们利用文献综述、专家共识、研究小组种族平等专家的反馈和试点制定了焦点小组指南。焦点小组以虚拟方式进行,录音,并逐字抄录。我们使用主题分析来编码文本,创建类别,并开发主题,直到我们达到主题充分性。我们完成了会员审核,确保主题的可信度。结果:共有40名住院医师参与了6个焦点小组,其中19名是UIM, 21名是非UIM。我们确定了7个主题,总结为:1)医学中的种族主义普遍存在,因此(2)反种族主义教育对培养称职的医生至关重要,3)教育应扩展到所有医疗保健提供者。4)居民希望教育侧重于以行动为导向的策略,以推进反种族主义,5)由有种族主义学习和生活经验的人教授,6)在一个对UIM居民心理安全的空间里,7)有足够的时间和财政资源来成功实施和参与。结论:我们的多机构研究确认了儿科住院医师反种族主义教育的必要性,促进了共同创造作为影响文化变革的方法,并为课程设计和实施提供了实用的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
期刊最新文献
Internal medicine clerks' motivation in an online course: a mixed-methods study. Interprofessional teaching rounds in medical education: improving clinical problem-solving ability and interprofessional collaboration skills. The family medicine accelerated track at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center: results from a 10-year program to bend the primary care curve. Exploring the significance of medical humanities in shaping internship performance: insights from curriculum categories. Digital health competences and AI beliefs as conditions for the practice of evidence-based medicine: a study of prospective physicians in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1