The emergence of academic pediatric acute and urgent care fellowships: entrustable professional activities.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2485503
Haroon Shaukat, Deena Berkowitz, Ioannis Koutroulis, Emily Willner
{"title":"The emergence of academic pediatric acute and urgent care fellowships: entrustable professional activities.","authors":"Haroon Shaukat, Deena Berkowitz, Ioannis Koutroulis, Emily Willner","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2485503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) defined 6 core competencies (medical knowledge, patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, systems-based practice, interpersonal and communication skills, and professionalism) to be used as a framework for outcomes-based assessment. Concurrent to the development of specialty-specific competencies and milestones, the concept of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) were introduced. EPAs describe what a learner can do at each of the 5 levels of entrustment. There are four pediatric acute and urgent and urgent care (PAC) fellowships to date, however, no curricular consensus exists. This article seeks to develop a set of nationally agreed-upon PAC-specific EPAs to be used by emerging fellowships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multi-step iterative qualitative study using a web-based survey was used for EPA development and validity. A modified-Delphi panel, comprised of pediatric educators from multiple institutions, participated in four rounds to reach consensus (≥80%). EPAs were ranked using a 5 point-Likert scale, then from most important to least important in series, and finally individually as yes/no for each EPAs inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey response rate was 83% (19/23). Six of the 7 EPAs were deemed on average to be high priority or essential. There was clear consensus on four EPAs and less agreement amongst the other three. Ultimately, 3 of the 7 EPAs reached consensus for inclusion, with agreement ranging from 84% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>PAC-specific EPAs focusing on clinical excellence, procedural competence, and high-quality care were all deemed essential components for PAC fellowships. Delineation of these EPAs will be critical to guide development of fellowship curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2485503"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980184/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2485503","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) defined 6 core competencies (medical knowledge, patient care, practice-based learning and improvement, systems-based practice, interpersonal and communication skills, and professionalism) to be used as a framework for outcomes-based assessment. Concurrent to the development of specialty-specific competencies and milestones, the concept of entrustable professional activities (EPAs) were introduced. EPAs describe what a learner can do at each of the 5 levels of entrustment. There are four pediatric acute and urgent and urgent care (PAC) fellowships to date, however, no curricular consensus exists. This article seeks to develop a set of nationally agreed-upon PAC-specific EPAs to be used by emerging fellowships.

Methods: Multi-step iterative qualitative study using a web-based survey was used for EPA development and validity. A modified-Delphi panel, comprised of pediatric educators from multiple institutions, participated in four rounds to reach consensus (≥80%). EPAs were ranked using a 5 point-Likert scale, then from most important to least important in series, and finally individually as yes/no for each EPAs inclusion.

Results: Survey response rate was 83% (19/23). Six of the 7 EPAs were deemed on average to be high priority or essential. There was clear consensus on four EPAs and less agreement amongst the other three. Ultimately, 3 of the 7 EPAs reached consensus for inclusion, with agreement ranging from 84% to 100%.

Conclusion(s): PAC-specific EPAs focusing on clinical excellence, procedural competence, and high-quality care were all deemed essential components for PAC fellowships. Delineation of these EPAs will be critical to guide development of fellowship curricula.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术儿科急症护理奖学金的出现:可信赖的专业活动。
目标:研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)定义了6项核心能力(医学知识、患者护理、基于实践的学习和改进、基于系统的实践、人际关系和沟通技巧以及专业精神),作为基于结果的评估框架。在发展专业能力和里程碑的同时,引入了可信赖的专业活动(EPAs)的概念。EPAs描述了学习者在5个级别的委托中可以做什么。迄今为止,有四个儿科急症和紧急护理(PAC)研究金,然而,没有课程共识存在。本文旨在制定一套国家商定的针对太平洋行动计划的环境保护措施,供新兴研究金使用。方法:采用基于网络的多步骤迭代定性研究,对EPA的开发和效度进行评估。由来自多个机构的儿科教育工作者组成的修正德尔菲小组参与了四轮以达成共识(≥80%)。环境保护措施采用5点李克特量表进行排名,然后依次从最重要到最不重要,最后分别为每个环境保护措施纳入的是/否。结果:调查应答率为83%(19/23)。在7个环境保护措施中,平均有6个被认为是高度优先或重要的。在四个环境保护协定上有明确的共识,而在其他三个方面的共识较少。最终,7个EPAs中有3个达成了纳入的共识,一致性从84%到100%。结论:关注临床卓越、程序能力和高质量护理的PAC特异性EPAs都被认为是PAC奖学金的重要组成部分。这些环境保护措施的界定对于指导研究金课程的发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
期刊最新文献
Internal medicine clerks' motivation in an online course: a mixed-methods study. Interprofessional teaching rounds in medical education: improving clinical problem-solving ability and interprofessional collaboration skills. The family medicine accelerated track at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center: results from a 10-year program to bend the primary care curve. Exploring the significance of medical humanities in shaping internship performance: insights from curriculum categories. Digital health competences and AI beliefs as conditions for the practice of evidence-based medicine: a study of prospective physicians in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1