Surgical simulation in emergency management and communication improves performance, confidence, and patient safety in medical students.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Medical Education Online Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-08 DOI:10.1080/10872981.2025.2486976
Mazlum Baris, Nils von Schaper, Hannah Sofie Weis, Klaus Fröhlich, Christian Rustenbach, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Christian Schlensak, Christoph Salewski
{"title":"Surgical simulation in emergency management and communication improves performance, confidence, and patient safety in medical students.","authors":"Mazlum Baris, Nils von Schaper, Hannah Sofie Weis, Klaus Fröhlich, Christian Rustenbach, Anne Herrmann-Werner, Christian Schlensak, Christoph Salewski","doi":"10.1080/10872981.2025.2486976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to enhance the confidence and operational safety of 5th-year medical students in the operating room (OR), addressing their corona pandemic gap in surgical training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We augmented the surgical curriculum focusing on pre-, intra-, and post-operative skills, centered around a phantom operation as a pre-test-retest simulation. We measured confidence to assist in surgery on a 5-level Likert-scale and monitored surgical performance metrics (skin-to-skin time, blood loss, blood and volume transfusion, complications, fatal outcome). Half the cohort was explicitly video trained in hemostasis, while the other half in emergency communication. Factual knowledge gains were assessed with online questionnaires. The groups served as reciprocal controls, as confidence (communication group) and surgical performance (bleeding group) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, the pre-test performance of the 126 participants on the phantom operation was suboptimal, ranging from poor to mediocre. Notably, the retest outcomes demonstrated significant surgical performance improvements following the targeted lessons (e.g. blood loss pre-test 906 ± 468 mL, retest 292 ± 173 mL, <i>p</i> < 0.01, <i>n</i> = 35 teams), with the most pronounced enhancements observed in confidence and emergency communication skills (confidence pre-test 2.42 ± 0.52, retest 3.55 ± 0.64, <i>p</i> < 0.01, <i>n</i> = 35 teams). There is a strong tendency (<i>p</i> = 0.08) that the communication group (1.28 ± 0.53) had higher gains in confidence than the bleeding group (0.997 ± 0.4) with a moderate effect size (Cohen's D = 0.6). Students reported increased confidence in assisting in surgery compared to their initial self-assessments. These results show that the structured exposure to a pre-test-retest phantom operation substantially elevates students' capability to act safely and assertively in the OR.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This approach appears to foster a justified increase in confidence and surgical performance, potentially elevating patient safety among students and residents in training.</p>","PeriodicalId":47656,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education Online","volume":"30 1","pages":"2486976"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11983577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education Online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2025.2486976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aims to enhance the confidence and operational safety of 5th-year medical students in the operating room (OR), addressing their corona pandemic gap in surgical training.

Methods: We augmented the surgical curriculum focusing on pre-, intra-, and post-operative skills, centered around a phantom operation as a pre-test-retest simulation. We measured confidence to assist in surgery on a 5-level Likert-scale and monitored surgical performance metrics (skin-to-skin time, blood loss, blood and volume transfusion, complications, fatal outcome). Half the cohort was explicitly video trained in hemostasis, while the other half in emergency communication. Factual knowledge gains were assessed with online questionnaires. The groups served as reciprocal controls, as confidence (communication group) and surgical performance (bleeding group) were compared.

Results: Initially, the pre-test performance of the 126 participants on the phantom operation was suboptimal, ranging from poor to mediocre. Notably, the retest outcomes demonstrated significant surgical performance improvements following the targeted lessons (e.g. blood loss pre-test 906 ± 468 mL, retest 292 ± 173 mL, p < 0.01, n = 35 teams), with the most pronounced enhancements observed in confidence and emergency communication skills (confidence pre-test 2.42 ± 0.52, retest 3.55 ± 0.64, p < 0.01, n = 35 teams). There is a strong tendency (p = 0.08) that the communication group (1.28 ± 0.53) had higher gains in confidence than the bleeding group (0.997 ± 0.4) with a moderate effect size (Cohen's D = 0.6). Students reported increased confidence in assisting in surgery compared to their initial self-assessments. These results show that the structured exposure to a pre-test-retest phantom operation substantially elevates students' capability to act safely and assertively in the OR.

Discussion: This approach appears to foster a justified increase in confidence and surgical performance, potentially elevating patient safety among students and residents in training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科模拟急救管理和沟通提高医学生的表现,信心和患者安全。
导言:本研究旨在增强五年级医学生在手术室(OR)中的信心和操作安全,解决他们在外科培训中的电晕大流行缺口:方法:我们增强了外科课程,重点放在术前、术中和术后技能上,并将幻影手术作为考前-复试模拟的核心。我们采用 5 级李克特量表来衡量协助手术的信心,并监测手术绩效指标(皮肤接触时间、失血量、输血和输液量、并发症、致命结果)。其中一半人接受了明确的止血视频培训,另一半人接受了紧急沟通培训。通过在线问卷调查对实际知识的掌握情况进行评估。两组作为相互对照,对信心(沟通组)和手术表现(出血组)进行比较:最初,126 名参与者在模拟手术中的预试成绩并不理想,从较差到一般不等。值得注意的是,复测结果表明,在接受了有针对性的课程后,手术成绩有了显著提高(例如,失血量预测为 906 ± 468 mL,复测为 292 ± 173 mL,p n = 35 个小组),信心和应急沟通技能的提高最为明显(信心预测为 2.42 ± 0.52,复测为 3.55 ± 0.64,p n = 35 个小组)。沟通组(1.28 ± 0.53)比出血组(0.997 ± 0.4)在自信心方面有更大的提高(p = 0.08),效果大小适中(Cohen's D = 0.6)。与最初的自我评估相比,学生们对协助手术的信心有所增强。这些结果表明,有计划地让学生在测试前接触模拟手术,可大大提高他们在手术室中安全、果断行事的能力:讨论:这种方法似乎能促进学生自信心和手术表现的合理提高,从而有可能提高受训学生和住院医师的患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education Online
Medical Education Online EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education Online is an open access journal of health care education, publishing peer-reviewed research, perspectives, reviews, and early documentation of new ideas and trends. Medical Education Online aims to disseminate information on the education and training of physicians and other health care professionals. Manuscripts may address any aspect of health care education and training, including, but not limited to: -Basic science education -Clinical science education -Residency education -Learning theory -Problem-based learning (PBL) -Curriculum development -Research design and statistics -Measurement and evaluation -Faculty development -Informatics/web
期刊最新文献
Internal medicine clerks' motivation in an online course: a mixed-methods study. Interprofessional teaching rounds in medical education: improving clinical problem-solving ability and interprofessional collaboration skills. The family medicine accelerated track at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center: results from a 10-year program to bend the primary care curve. Exploring the significance of medical humanities in shaping internship performance: insights from curriculum categories. Digital health competences and AI beliefs as conditions for the practice of evidence-based medicine: a study of prospective physicians in Canada.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1