Cross-efficiency aggregation method considering bounded rationality: An application to healthcare service

IF 3 Q3 MANAGEMENT EURO Journal on Decision Processes Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100059
Hao Pan , Guoliang Yang , Yuanyu Lou , Zhongcheng Guan
{"title":"Cross-efficiency aggregation method considering bounded rationality: An application to healthcare service","authors":"Hao Pan ,&nbsp;Guoliang Yang ,&nbsp;Yuanyu Lou ,&nbsp;Zhongcheng Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.ejdp.2025.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The cross-efficiency evaluation method is a powerful tool for assessing efficiency. However, previous research has often overlooked the bounded rationality of decision makers (DMs), thereby neglecting key factors. To address this gap, we investigate the cross-efficiency weight aggregation method under bounded rationality. Firstly, we develop a utility function incorporating inequality aversion and overconfidence, integrating them into the cross-efficiency weight aggregation process to formulate the equity-minded cross-efficiency method. Secondly, building upon this method, we address consensus issues within evaluation groups by introducing a consensus compromise algorithm. This algorithm aims to reconcile group opinions based on the principles of the equity-minded cross-efficiency approach. Furthermore, we apply our model to evaluate healthcare service efficiency in China. Our analysis explores the impact of overconfidence and fairness preferences, using a Tobit regression model to examine factors influencing healthcare service efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44104,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100059"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943825000019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The cross-efficiency evaluation method is a powerful tool for assessing efficiency. However, previous research has often overlooked the bounded rationality of decision makers (DMs), thereby neglecting key factors. To address this gap, we investigate the cross-efficiency weight aggregation method under bounded rationality. Firstly, we develop a utility function incorporating inequality aversion and overconfidence, integrating them into the cross-efficiency weight aggregation process to formulate the equity-minded cross-efficiency method. Secondly, building upon this method, we address consensus issues within evaluation groups by introducing a consensus compromise algorithm. This algorithm aims to reconcile group opinions based on the principles of the equity-minded cross-efficiency approach. Furthermore, we apply our model to evaluate healthcare service efficiency in China. Our analysis explores the impact of overconfidence and fairness preferences, using a Tobit regression model to examine factors influencing healthcare service efficiency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑有限理性的交叉效率聚合方法在医疗保健服务中的应用
交叉效率评价方法是评价效率的有力工具。然而,以往的研究往往忽视了决策者的有限理性,从而忽略了关键因素。为了解决这一问题,我们研究了有限理性下的交叉效率权值聚合方法。首先,我们建立了一个包含不平等厌恶和过度自信的效用函数,并将它们整合到交叉效率权重聚合过程中,形成了公平意识交叉效率方法。其次,在此方法的基础上,我们通过引入共识妥协算法来解决评估组内的共识问题。该算法的目的是基于公平的交叉效率方法的原则来协调群体意见。此外,我们将该模型应用于中国的医疗保健服务效率评估。我们的分析探讨了过度自信和公平偏好的影响,使用Tobit回归模型来检验影响医疗服务效率的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
A stage-gate decision process for guiding the development of AI solutions for preventive maintenance Projecting decisions. Unfolding architectural design practice in decision-making processes Preferential knowledge for multi-criteria decision making: Stability and consistency of decision rules and weights Real-world relevance of multicriteria decision analysis applied to environmental problems: A critical review of operational research literature Electric vehicle purchase decision: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1