Thomas R Lane, Scott H Snyder, Joshua S Harris, Fabio Urbina, Sean Ekins
{"title":"Adverse Outcome Pathway and Machine Learning to Predict Drug Induced Seizure Liability.","authors":"Thomas R Lane, Scott H Snyder, Joshua S Harris, Fabio Urbina, Sean Ekins","doi":"10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central nervous system (CNS) drugs have the highest clinical attrition, often due to CNS-related toxicities such as drug-induced seizures (DIS). Early prediction of DIS risk could reduce failure rates and optimize drug development by prioritizing testing in experimental models of DIS. Using seizure-relevant Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) from various sources, we identified 67 seizure-associated protein targets. Biological activity data (EC<sub>50</sub>, IC<sub>50</sub>, <i>K</i><sub>i</sub>) for these targets were curated from ChEMBL, enabling development of ∼2000 regression and classification (random forest, support vector, XGBoost) models. Support vector regression (SVR) models achieved an average MAE of 0.54 ± 0.09 (-log <i>M</i>), while random forest classifiers yielded mean ROC AUC, accuracy, and recall of 0.88, 0.85, and 0.70, respectively (5-fold CV) across all targets. Multitarget XGBoost models concatenating ECFP6 fingerprints and target encodings (one-hot or ProtBERT) also demonstrated excellent overall performance, although their predictive accuracy was notably lower for leave-out sets compared to individual target-specific models. These models were used to predict activity for a seizure-liability data set with target-annotated DIS risk predictions. Overall, our findings support the utility of using target-specific machine-learning models for DIS prediction to aid in early toxicity testing prioritization and reduce CNS drug attrition.</p>","PeriodicalId":13,"journal":{"name":"ACS Chemical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"2085-2099"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Chemical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00177","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) drugs have the highest clinical attrition, often due to CNS-related toxicities such as drug-induced seizures (DIS). Early prediction of DIS risk could reduce failure rates and optimize drug development by prioritizing testing in experimental models of DIS. Using seizure-relevant Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) from various sources, we identified 67 seizure-associated protein targets. Biological activity data (EC50, IC50, Ki) for these targets were curated from ChEMBL, enabling development of ∼2000 regression and classification (random forest, support vector, XGBoost) models. Support vector regression (SVR) models achieved an average MAE of 0.54 ± 0.09 (-log M), while random forest classifiers yielded mean ROC AUC, accuracy, and recall of 0.88, 0.85, and 0.70, respectively (5-fold CV) across all targets. Multitarget XGBoost models concatenating ECFP6 fingerprints and target encodings (one-hot or ProtBERT) also demonstrated excellent overall performance, although their predictive accuracy was notably lower for leave-out sets compared to individual target-specific models. These models were used to predict activity for a seizure-liability data set with target-annotated DIS risk predictions. Overall, our findings support the utility of using target-specific machine-learning models for DIS prediction to aid in early toxicity testing prioritization and reduce CNS drug attrition.
期刊介绍:
ACS Chemical Neuroscience publishes high-quality research articles and reviews that showcase chemical, quantitative biological, biophysical and bioengineering approaches to the understanding of the nervous system and to the development of new treatments for neurological disorders. Research in the journal focuses on aspects of chemical neurobiology and bio-neurochemistry such as the following:
Neurotransmitters and receptors
Neuropharmaceuticals and therapeutics
Neural development—Plasticity, and degeneration
Chemical, physical, and computational methods in neuroscience
Neuronal diseases—basis, detection, and treatment
Mechanism of aging, learning, memory and behavior
Pain and sensory processing
Neurotoxins
Neuroscience-inspired bioengineering
Development of methods in chemical neurobiology
Neuroimaging agents and technologies
Animal models for central nervous system diseases
Behavioral research