The Effect of Various Remineralizing Agents on Post-bleaching Shade Stability: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-08-29 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2896Ismail10
B Ismail, Z Soliman, B Ismail, F El-Askary
{"title":"The Effect of Various Remineralizing Agents on Post-bleaching Shade Stability: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Study.","authors":"B Ismail, Z Soliman, B Ismail, F El-Askary","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2896Ismail10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of four remineralizing agents on post-bleaching shade stability and to evaluate the agreement between objective and subjective shade assessments.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Forty-eight eligible patients underwent in-office bleaching with 32% hydrogen peroxide, followed by one of the following: 1. potassium nitrate/sodium fluoride (After Whitening Mousse, AWM, n=11), 2. casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate/fluoride (MI Paste Plus, MI, n=13), 3. nano-hydroxyapatite/fluoride (Remin Pro, RP, n=11), or 4. PolyAmidoamine Dendrimer (PAMAM, n=13). Stability was assessed using ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, and ΔWID at regular follow-ups over one year. Statistical analyses were performed using a Linear Mixed-Effects Model, Kendall's W, and Cohen's Kappa (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on linear mixedeffects model, remineralizing agents did not significantly affect ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, or ΔWID (p⟩0.05). The follow-up time had a significant effect on these color parameters (p⟨0.05). No post-bleaching shade relapse was observed in any of the experimental groups. There were slight to moderate agreements between the two evaluation methods (Kappa=0.106, W=0.504).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>None of the remineralizing agents compromised post-bleaching shade stability. Accurate post-bleaching shade stability assessment requires both objective and subjective methods.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Bleaching stability was maintained with all remineralizing agents evaluated in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"247-256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2896Ismail10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of four remineralizing agents on post-bleaching shade stability and to evaluate the agreement between objective and subjective shade assessments.

Methodology: Forty-eight eligible patients underwent in-office bleaching with 32% hydrogen peroxide, followed by one of the following: 1. potassium nitrate/sodium fluoride (After Whitening Mousse, AWM, n=11), 2. casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate/fluoride (MI Paste Plus, MI, n=13), 3. nano-hydroxyapatite/fluoride (Remin Pro, RP, n=11), or 4. PolyAmidoamine Dendrimer (PAMAM, n=13). Stability was assessed using ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, and ΔWID at regular follow-ups over one year. Statistical analyses were performed using a Linear Mixed-Effects Model, Kendall's W, and Cohen's Kappa (α = 0.05).

Results: Based on linear mixedeffects model, remineralizing agents did not significantly affect ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, or ΔWID (p⟩0.05). The follow-up time had a significant effect on these color parameters (p⟨0.05). No post-bleaching shade relapse was observed in any of the experimental groups. There were slight to moderate agreements between the two evaluation methods (Kappa=0.106, W=0.504).

Conclusions: None of the remineralizing agents compromised post-bleaching shade stability. Accurate post-bleaching shade stability assessment requires both objective and subjective methods.

Clinical relevance: Bleaching stability was maintained with all remineralizing agents evaluated in this study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多种再矿化剂对漂白后色光稳定性的影响:一项随机双盲临床研究。
目的:本研究旨在比较四种再矿化剂对漂白后遮光稳定性的影响,并评估客观和主观遮光评估之间的一致性。方法:48例符合条件的患者在办公室用32%的双氧水进行漂白,然后进行以下其中一项:硝酸钾/氟化钠(美白摩丝后,AWM, n=11), 2。酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙/氟化物(MI Paste Plus, MI, n=13), 2。纳米羟基磷灰石/氟化物(Remin Pro, RP, n=11)或4。聚酰胺胺树状大分子(PAMAM, n=13)。在一年多的定期随访中,使用ΔE、ΔSGU、ΔL*、Δb*和ΔWID评估稳定性。统计学分析采用线性混合效应模型Kendall’s W和Cohen’s Kappa (α = 0.05)。结果:基于线性混合效应模型,再矿化剂对ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*或ΔWID没有显著影响(p⟩0.05)。随访时间对这些颜色参数有显著影响(p⟨0.05)。所有实验组均未见漂白后色斑复发。两种评价方法有轻微到中度的一致性(Kappa=0.106, W=0.504)。结论:没有再矿化剂损害漂白后荫蔽稳定性。准确的漂白后遮光稳定性评估需要客观和主观的方法。临床相关性:本研究评估的所有再矿化剂均能维持漂白稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
A Narrative Review on the Survival and Success Rates of Dental Veneers in Contemporary Dentistry. The Effect of Various Remineralizing Agents on Post-bleaching Shade Stability: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Study. Evaluating the Long-Term Success of Removable and Fixed Prosthodontic Treatment in Completely Edentulous Patients: Comparative Clinical- Radiographic Study. Mandibular Advancement Devices for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Printed Versus Conventional Denture Base Resins: Physical- Mechanical Evaluation After Immersion in Beverages and Cleansers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1