Measurable Residual Disease-Guided Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

IF 96.2 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL New England Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-15 DOI:10.1056/nejmoa2504341
Talha Munir,Sean Girvan,David A Cairns,Adrian Bloor,David Allsup,Abraham M Varghese,Satyen Gohil,Shankara Paneesha,Andrew Pettitt,Toby Eyre,Christopher P Fox,Francesco Forconi,Constantine Balotis,Nicholas Pemberton,Oonagh Sheehy,John Gribben,Nagah Elmusharaf,Simona Gatto,Gavin Preston,Anna Schuh,Renata Walewska,Lelia Duley,Nichola Webster,Surita Dalal,Andrew Rawstron,Dena Howard,Anna Hockaday,Sharon Jackson,Natasha Greatorex,Sue Bell,David Stones,Julia M Brown,Piers E M Patten,Peter Hillmen,
{"title":"Measurable Residual Disease-Guided Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.","authors":"Talha Munir,Sean Girvan,David A Cairns,Adrian Bloor,David Allsup,Abraham M Varghese,Satyen Gohil,Shankara Paneesha,Andrew Pettitt,Toby Eyre,Christopher P Fox,Francesco Forconi,Constantine Balotis,Nicholas Pemberton,Oonagh Sheehy,John Gribben,Nagah Elmusharaf,Simona Gatto,Gavin Preston,Anna Schuh,Renata Walewska,Lelia Duley,Nichola Webster,Surita Dalal,Andrew Rawstron,Dena Howard,Anna Hockaday,Sharon Jackson,Natasha Greatorex,Sue Bell,David Stones,Julia M Brown,Piers E M Patten,Peter Hillmen,","doi":"10.1056/nejmoa2504341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAn interim analysis of progression-free survival in this trial showed that ibrutinib-venetoclax was superior to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Whether ibrutinib-venetoclax is more effective than ibrutinib alone is unclear.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn this phase 3, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with CLL to receive ibrutinib-venetoclax, ibrutinib alone, or FCR. The primary end points were undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow within 2 years in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group and progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the FCR group. A powered secondary end point was progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group. Other secondary end points included overall survival.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 172 of the 260 participants (66.2%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group had undetectable MRD in bone marrow within 2 years, as compared with none of the 263 participants in the ibrutinib-alone group (P<0.001) and 127 of the 263 participants (48.3%) in the FCR group. With a median follow-up of 62.2 months, disease progression or death occurred in 18 participants (6.9%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, as compared with 59 (22.4%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.49; P<0.001) and 112 (42.6%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.21; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 93.9% with ibrutinib-venetoclax, 79.0% with ibrutinib alone, and 58.1% with FCR. Death occurred in 11 participants (4.2%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, as compared with 26 (9.9%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83) and 39 (14.8%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50). Sudden death occurred in 3, 8, and 4 participants in the ibrutinib-venetoclax, ibrutinib-alone, and FCR groups, respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWith extended follow-up and increased enrollment, our trial showed that undetectable MRD and extended progression-free survival were more common with ibrutinib-venetoclax than with ibrutinib alone or FCR. The results for overall survival were also consistent with a benefit of ibrutinib-venetoclax. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; FLAIR ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN01844152; EudraCT number, 2013-001944-76.).","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"269 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2504341","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND An interim analysis of progression-free survival in this trial showed that ibrutinib-venetoclax was superior to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Whether ibrutinib-venetoclax is more effective than ibrutinib alone is unclear. METHODS In this phase 3, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with CLL to receive ibrutinib-venetoclax, ibrutinib alone, or FCR. The primary end points were undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow within 2 years in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group and progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the FCR group. A powered secondary end point was progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group. Other secondary end points included overall survival. RESULTS A total of 172 of the 260 participants (66.2%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group had undetectable MRD in bone marrow within 2 years, as compared with none of the 263 participants in the ibrutinib-alone group (P<0.001) and 127 of the 263 participants (48.3%) in the FCR group. With a median follow-up of 62.2 months, disease progression or death occurred in 18 participants (6.9%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, as compared with 59 (22.4%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.49; P<0.001) and 112 (42.6%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.21; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 93.9% with ibrutinib-venetoclax, 79.0% with ibrutinib alone, and 58.1% with FCR. Death occurred in 11 participants (4.2%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, as compared with 26 (9.9%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83) and 39 (14.8%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50). Sudden death occurred in 3, 8, and 4 participants in the ibrutinib-venetoclax, ibrutinib-alone, and FCR groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS With extended follow-up and increased enrollment, our trial showed that undetectable MRD and extended progression-free survival were more common with ibrutinib-venetoclax than with ibrutinib alone or FCR. The results for overall survival were also consistent with a benefit of ibrutinib-venetoclax. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; FLAIR ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN01844152; EudraCT number, 2013-001944-76.).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性淋巴细胞白血病的可测量残留疾病指导治疗。
该试验的无进展生存期中期分析显示,在慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者中,依鲁替尼-维托clax优于氟达拉滨-环磷酰胺-利妥昔单抗(FCR)。ibrutinib-venetoclax是否比单独使用ibrutinib更有效尚不清楚。方法:在这项3期、多中心、开放标签试验中,我们随机分配了CLL患者接受依鲁替尼-venetoclax、依鲁替尼单用或FCR治疗。主要终点是与单独使用伊鲁替尼组相比,伊鲁替尼-venetoclax组2年内骨髓中无法检测到的可测量的残留疾病(MRD),以及与FCR组相比,伊鲁替尼-venetoclax组的无进展生存期。一个重要的次要终点是与单独使用伊鲁替尼组相比,伊鲁替尼-venetoclax组的无进展生存期。其他次要终点包括总生存期。结果:260名患者中,伊鲁替尼-维托clax组有172名(66.2%)患者在2年内骨髓MRD检测不到,而单独使用伊鲁替尼组和FCR组分别有127名和127名(48.3%)患者在2年内骨髓MRD检测不到。中位随访时间为62.2个月,伊鲁替尼-维托clax组有18名参与者(6.9%)发生疾病进展或死亡,而单独伊鲁替尼组有59名参与者(22.4%)发生疾病进展或死亡(风险比,0.29;95%置信区间[CI], 0.17 ~ 0.49;P<0.001), FCR组为112例(42.6%)(风险比0.13;95% CI, 0.08 ~ 0.21;P < 0.001)。ibrutinib-venetoclax组5年无进展生存率为93.9%,ibrutinib单用组为79.0%,FCR组为58.1%。ibrutinib-venetoclax组有11名参与者(4.2%)死亡,而单独ibrutinib组有26名参与者(9.9%)死亡(风险比0.41;FCR组的95% CI, 0.20 ~ 0.83)和39(14.8%)(风险比,0.26;95% CI, 0.13 ~ 0.50)。在伊鲁替尼-维托克拉、单独伊鲁替尼和FCR组中,分别有3、8和4名参与者发生猝死。结论:随着随访时间的延长和入组人数的增加,我们的试验表明,与单独使用伊鲁替尼或FCR相比,使用伊鲁替尼-维托clax更常见的是无法检测到的MRD和延长的无进展生存期。总生存期的结果也与依鲁替尼-维托克拉克斯的获益一致。(由英国癌症研究中心和其他机构资助;FLAIR ISRCTN注册号,ISRCTN01844152;稿号:2013-001944-76。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New England Journal of Medicine
New England Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
145.40
自引率
0.60%
发文量
1839
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Durvalumab in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer. Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporin. Microcysts in Lithium-Induced Nephropathy. Rapid Recovery of Donor Hearts for Transplantation after Circulatory Death. Apixaban for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1