Impact of opinion dynamics on recurrent pandemic waves: balancing risk aversion and peer pressure.

IF 4 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Interface Focus Pub Date : 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1098/rsfs.2024.0038
Sheryl L Chang, Quang Dang Nguyen, Carl Joseph Edmund Suster, Ma Christina Jamerlan, Rebecca J Rockett, Vitali Sintchenko, Tania C Sorrell, Alexandra Martiniuk, Mikhail Prokopenko
{"title":"Impact of opinion dynamics on recurrent pandemic waves: balancing risk aversion and peer pressure.","authors":"Sheryl L Chang, Quang Dang Nguyen, Carl Joseph Edmund Suster, Ma Christina Jamerlan, Rebecca J Rockett, Vitali Sintchenko, Tania C Sorrell, Alexandra Martiniuk, Mikhail Prokopenko","doi":"10.1098/rsfs.2024.0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recurrent waves, which are often observed during long pandemics, typically form as a result of several interrelated dynamics, including public health interventions, population mobility and behaviour, varying disease transmissibility due to pathogen mutations, and changes in host immunity due to recency of vaccination or previous infections. Complex nonlinear dependencies among these dynamics, including feedback between disease incidence and the opinion-driven adoption of social distancing (SD) behaviour, remain poorly understood, particularly in scenarios involving heterogeneous population, partial and waning immunity and rapidly changing public opinions. This study addressed this challenge by proposing an opinion dynamics model that accounts for changes in SD behaviour (i.e. whether to adopt SD) by modelling both individual risk perception and peer pressure. The opinion dynamics model was integrated and validated within a large-scale agent-based COVID-19 pandemic simulation that modelled the spread of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 between December 2021 and June 2022 in Australia. Our study revealed that while holding epidemiological factors constant, the fluctuating adoption of SD, shaped by individual risk aversion and social peer pressure from both household and workplace environments, can reproduce these multi-wave patterns, pointing to the importance of social dynamics in understanding epidemic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13795,"journal":{"name":"Interface Focus","volume":"15 4","pages":"20240038"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12464575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interface Focus","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2024.0038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recurrent waves, which are often observed during long pandemics, typically form as a result of several interrelated dynamics, including public health interventions, population mobility and behaviour, varying disease transmissibility due to pathogen mutations, and changes in host immunity due to recency of vaccination or previous infections. Complex nonlinear dependencies among these dynamics, including feedback between disease incidence and the opinion-driven adoption of social distancing (SD) behaviour, remain poorly understood, particularly in scenarios involving heterogeneous population, partial and waning immunity and rapidly changing public opinions. This study addressed this challenge by proposing an opinion dynamics model that accounts for changes in SD behaviour (i.e. whether to adopt SD) by modelling both individual risk perception and peer pressure. The opinion dynamics model was integrated and validated within a large-scale agent-based COVID-19 pandemic simulation that modelled the spread of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 between December 2021 and June 2022 in Australia. Our study revealed that while holding epidemiological factors constant, the fluctuating adoption of SD, shaped by individual risk aversion and social peer pressure from both household and workplace environments, can reproduce these multi-wave patterns, pointing to the importance of social dynamics in understanding epidemic outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
舆论动态对经常性大流行浪潮的影响:平衡风险厌恶和同侪压力。
在长期大流行期间经常观察到的复发波,通常是由于若干相互关联的动态而形成的,包括公共卫生干预措施、人口流动和行为、由于病原体突变而引起的疾病传播性的变化,以及由于最近接种疫苗或以前感染而引起的宿主免疫力的变化。这些动态之间复杂的非线性依赖关系,包括疾病发病率和舆论驱动的社会距离(SD)行为之间的反馈,仍然知之甚少,特别是在涉及异质人口、部分和逐渐减弱的免疫力以及迅速变化的公众舆论的情况下。本研究通过提出一个意见动态模型来解决这一挑战,该模型通过模拟个人风险感知和同伴压力来解释可持续发展行为的变化(即是否采用可持续发展)。意见动态模型在基于主体的大规模COVID-19大流行模拟中进行了整合和验证,该模拟模拟了2021年12月至2022年6月期间SARS-CoV-2的Omicron变体的传播。我们的研究表明,在保持流行病学因素不变的情况下,受个人风险厌恶和来自家庭和工作环境的社会同伴压力的影响,SD的波动采用可以再现这些多波模式,指出社会动态在理解流行病结果方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interface Focus
Interface Focus BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Each Interface Focus themed issue is devoted to a particular subject at the interface of the physical and life sciences. Formed of high-quality articles, they aim to facilitate cross-disciplinary research across this traditional divide by acting as a forum accessible to all. Topics may be newly emerging areas of research or dynamic aspects of more established fields. Organisers of each Interface Focus are strongly encouraged to contextualise the journal within their chosen subject.
期刊最新文献
Improving modelling for epidemic response: a progress update from a community of UK infectious disease modellers. Why population heterogeneity matters for modelling infectious diseases. Optimization of school closures during an Omicron epidemic in Hong Kong: a modelling study. Impact of opinion dynamics on recurrent pandemic waves: balancing risk aversion and peer pressure. Equity considerations in COVID-19 vaccine allocation modelling: a methodological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1