A Bayesian two-stage framework for lineup-independent assessment of individual rebounding ability in the NBA.

IF 1.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports Pub Date : 2024-12-25 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.1515/jqas-2023-0097
Nicholas Kiriazis, Christian Genest, Alexandre Leblanc
{"title":"A Bayesian two-stage framework for lineup-independent assessment of individual rebounding ability in the NBA.","authors":"Nicholas Kiriazis, Christian Genest, Alexandre Leblanc","doi":"10.1515/jqas-2023-0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In basketball, traditional methods of assessing individual rebounding ability are problematic because they depend on all players present on the court rather than just on the player of interest. Although there exist modeling approaches to correct for this dependence, they are generally unsuitable for events with binary outcomes. In this paper, a Bayesian two-stage model is proposed to predict both individual and team rebound allocation. This approach makes it possible to identify players who help their team win the fight for rebounds, regardless of their individual rebounding totals. Although similar in flavor to the popular Adjusted Plus-Minus (APM) framework, the proposed strategy is different in that it does not assume that individual contributions are linearly additive on the response scale. Furthermore, the regularization approach is improved through rebounding-specific heuristics. A simulation study is performed to show the effectiveness of the proposed model, and the parameters are estimated using data from the 2020-21 NBA season. Predictions are then made for rebounding in the 2021-22 season. This study confirms that relying exclusively on individual rebounding rates could lead to the mis-evaluation of players' rebounding abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":16925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports","volume":"21 4","pages":"303-326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12671482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jqas-2023-0097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In basketball, traditional methods of assessing individual rebounding ability are problematic because they depend on all players present on the court rather than just on the player of interest. Although there exist modeling approaches to correct for this dependence, they are generally unsuitable for events with binary outcomes. In this paper, a Bayesian two-stage model is proposed to predict both individual and team rebound allocation. This approach makes it possible to identify players who help their team win the fight for rebounds, regardless of their individual rebounding totals. Although similar in flavor to the popular Adjusted Plus-Minus (APM) framework, the proposed strategy is different in that it does not assume that individual contributions are linearly additive on the response scale. Furthermore, the regularization approach is improved through rebounding-specific heuristics. A simulation study is performed to show the effectiveness of the proposed model, and the parameters are estimated using data from the 2020-21 NBA season. Predictions are then made for rebounding in the 2021-22 season. This study confirms that relying exclusively on individual rebounding rates could lead to the mis-evaluation of players' rebounding abilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于贝叶斯两阶段框架的NBA球员个人篮板球能力独立评估。
在篮球比赛中,评估个人篮板能力的传统方法是有问题的,因为它们依赖于在场的所有球员,而不仅仅是感兴趣的球员。尽管存在校正这种依赖性的建模方法,但它们通常不适合具有二元结果的事件。本文提出了一个贝叶斯两阶段模型来预测个人和团队的反弹分配。这种方法可以识别那些帮助球队赢得篮板的球员,而不管他们的个人篮板总数如何。虽然在风格上与流行的调整加减(APM)框架相似,但所提出的策略的不同之处在于,它不假设个人贡献在响应量表上是线性相加的。此外,通过针对反弹的启发式算法改进了正则化方法。仿真研究表明了该模型的有效性,并利用2020-21赛季NBA的数据对模型参数进行了估计。然后对2021-22赛季的反弹进行预测。本研究证实,单纯依赖个人篮板率可能会导致对球员篮板能力的错误评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports
Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports (JQAS), an official journal of the American Statistical Association, publishes timely, high-quality peer-reviewed research on the quantitative aspects of professional and amateur sports, including collegiate and Olympic competition. The scope of application reflects the increasing demand for novel methods to analyze and understand data in the growing field of sports analytics. Articles come from a wide variety of sports and diverse perspectives, and address topics such as game outcome models, measurement and evaluation of player performance, tournament structure, analysis of rules and adjudication, within-game strategy, analysis of sporting technologies, and player and team ranking methods. JQAS seeks to publish manuscripts that demonstrate original ways of approaching problems, develop cutting edge methods, and apply innovative thinking to solve difficult challenges in sports contexts. JQAS brings together researchers from various disciplines, including statistics, operations research, machine learning, scientific computing, econometrics, and sports management.
期刊最新文献
Investigating experiential effects in online chess using a hierarchical Bayesian analysis. FIVB ranking: misstep in the right direction. A Bayesian two-stage framework for lineup-independent assessment of individual rebounding ability in the NBA. Improving the aggregation and evaluation of NBA mock drafts A basketball paradox: exploring NBA team defensive efficiency in a positionless game
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1