Assessment of three satellite precipitation products for hydrological studies in a data-scarce context: Ouarzazate basin, southern Morocco

Natural Hazards Research Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1016/j.nhres.2025.02.008
Khalid En-nagre , Mourad Aqnouy , Abdelmounim Bouadila , Chaimaa Et-Takaouy , Morad Chahid , Ismail Bouizrou , Ismail Hilal , Jamal Eddine Stitou El Messari , Aqil Tariq
{"title":"Assessment of three satellite precipitation products for hydrological studies in a data-scarce context: Ouarzazate basin, southern Morocco","authors":"Khalid En-nagre ,&nbsp;Mourad Aqnouy ,&nbsp;Abdelmounim Bouadila ,&nbsp;Chaimaa Et-Takaouy ,&nbsp;Morad Chahid ,&nbsp;Ismail Bouizrou ,&nbsp;Ismail Hilal ,&nbsp;Jamal Eddine Stitou El Messari ,&nbsp;Aqil Tariq","doi":"10.1016/j.nhres.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Arid and semi-arid regions, such as southern Morocco, face challenges due to limited precipitation data availability, posing significant obstacles for climate and hydrological studies. To bridge this data gap, this study directly evaluates the reliability of Satellite Precipitation Products (SPPs) from the latest version (V06) of the 3-hourly Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals (3IMERG-V06) for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM), The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM-3B42-V7), and Climate Hazards Group Infrared Rainfall Station (CHIRPSV2.0). The assessment involves comparing ground-based measurements in the Ouarzazate basin to estimate precipitation characteristics. Additionally, SPPs are indirectly evaluated for their ability to simulate runoff using two hydrological models (GR4J and HEC-HMS). The analysis employs the point-to-pixel method, and various performance criteria, including R<sup>2</sup>, NSE, PBIAS, RMSE, and Distance between Simulation and Observation Indices (DISO), are utilized for result comparison. Findings indicate that all three products struggle to accurately replicate daily precipitation amounts, with R<sup>2</sup> values ​&lt; ​0.5 and positive PBIAS values suggesting precipitation overestimation. However, when evaluating hydrological performance, the HEC-HMS model correctly simulates the observed flow when using ground-based data, with NSE (R<sup>2</sup>) values of 0.76 (0.63) during the validation phase. In contrast, the GR4J model performs poorly, with NSE (R<sup>2</sup>) values of 0.30 (0.45). When the three SPPs forced both models, HEC-HMS acceptably simulates flows using TRMM data, with NSE (R<sup>2</sup>) values of 0.57 (0.56) during the calibration phase and 0.63 (0.67) during the validation phase, along with positive PBIAS values below 15.30%. Additionally, flow irregularities and outliers affect simulation results in continuous mode, which can lead to biased estimates. However, the hydrological evaluation method is considered a complementary approach to assess the performance of SPPs, particularly in arid regions where data is scarce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100943,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Research","volume":"5 4","pages":"Pages 728-741"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666592125000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arid and semi-arid regions, such as southern Morocco, face challenges due to limited precipitation data availability, posing significant obstacles for climate and hydrological studies. To bridge this data gap, this study directly evaluates the reliability of Satellite Precipitation Products (SPPs) from the latest version (V06) of the 3-hourly Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals (3IMERG-V06) for Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM), The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM-3B42-V7), and Climate Hazards Group Infrared Rainfall Station (CHIRPSV2.0). The assessment involves comparing ground-based measurements in the Ouarzazate basin to estimate precipitation characteristics. Additionally, SPPs are indirectly evaluated for their ability to simulate runoff using two hydrological models (GR4J and HEC-HMS). The analysis employs the point-to-pixel method, and various performance criteria, including R2, NSE, PBIAS, RMSE, and Distance between Simulation and Observation Indices (DISO), are utilized for result comparison. Findings indicate that all three products struggle to accurately replicate daily precipitation amounts, with R2 values ​< ​0.5 and positive PBIAS values suggesting precipitation overestimation. However, when evaluating hydrological performance, the HEC-HMS model correctly simulates the observed flow when using ground-based data, with NSE (R2) values of 0.76 (0.63) during the validation phase. In contrast, the GR4J model performs poorly, with NSE (R2) values of 0.30 (0.45). When the three SPPs forced both models, HEC-HMS acceptably simulates flows using TRMM data, with NSE (R2) values of 0.57 (0.56) during the calibration phase and 0.63 (0.67) during the validation phase, along with positive PBIAS values below 15.30%. Additionally, flow irregularities and outliers affect simulation results in continuous mode, which can lead to biased estimates. However, the hydrological evaluation method is considered a complementary approach to assess the performance of SPPs, particularly in arid regions where data is scarce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在数据匮乏的情况下对水文研究中三个卫星降水产品的评估:摩洛哥南部的瓦尔扎扎特盆地
干旱和半干旱地区,如摩洛哥南部,由于降水数据有限而面临挑战,这对气候和水文研究构成了重大障碍。为了弥补这一数据差距,本研究直接评估了全球降水测量(GPM)最新版本(V06)、热带降雨测量任务(TRMM-3B42-V7)和气候危害组红外雨量站(CHIRPSV2.0)的卫星降水产品(SPPs)的可靠性。评估包括比较瓦尔扎扎特盆地的地面测量数据,以估计降水特征。此外,利用两种水文模型(GR4J和HEC-HMS)间接评估了spp模拟径流的能力。分析采用点到像素法,采用R2、NSE、PBIAS、RMSE、模拟与观测指数之间的距离(DISO)等多种性能标准对结果进行比较。研究结果表明,这三种产品都难以准确地复制日降水量,R2值为<; 0.5, PBIAS值为正,表明降水高估。然而,在评估水文性能时,HEC-HMS模型在使用地基数据时正确地模拟了观测流量,在验证阶段NSE (R2)值为0.76(0.63)。相比之下,GR4J模型表现较差,NSE (R2)值为0.30(0.45)。当三个SPPs强制两个模型时,HEC-HMS使用TRMM数据可以接受地模拟流动,在校准阶段的NSE (R2)值为0.57(0.56),在验证阶段的NSE (R2)值为0.63 (0.67),PBIAS值低于15.30%。此外,流动不规则性和异常值会影响连续模式下的模拟结果,从而导致估计偏差。然而,水文评价方法被认为是评估spp性能的补充方法,特别是在数据匮乏的干旱地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimized machine learning based model for the large-scale spatial prediction of landslides at Western Ghats in the State of Karnataka, India A comprehensive inventory of landslides triggered by Typhoon Gaemi (July 2024) in Zixing, Hunan, China Comparative analysis of drought indices to characterize drought in agro-climatic zones of Assam, northeast region of India Evaluating the socio-economic risks of a potential GLOF from Dudh Pokhari lake in Nepal's Everest Region Enhancing the reliability of social vulnerability assessment to natural hazards through combined machine learning methods: A case study in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1