Polarised upgrading: the changing occupational structure of large cities in Germany and the UK, 1991-2021.

IF 1.5 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Journal for Labour Market Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-20 DOI:10.1186/s12651-025-00420-2
Daniel Oesch, Katy Morris, Gina-Julia Westenberger
{"title":"Polarised upgrading: the changing occupational structure of large cities in Germany and the UK, 1991-2021.","authors":"Daniel Oesch, Katy Morris, Gina-Julia Westenberger","doi":"10.1186/s12651-025-00420-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An influential thesis predicted in the 1990s that large cities would become polarised as both high-wage professional and low-wage service jobs expanded at the expense of middle-wage workers. We revisit this thesis by analysing change in the occupational class structure of the ten largest cities in Germany and the UK, 1991-2021. Using UK census and German social security data (SIAB), we find for all cities strong job growth at the top - among professionals and managers -, moderate growth at the bottom - among service and sales workers - and a sharp decline in the middle - among office clerks and production workers. The result is occupational class upgrading with a polarised twist. Polarised upgrading was particularly strong in London, but also evident in Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester or Newcastle. German cities experienced similar levels of occupational upgrading, but less polarisation. Notably in Berlin, Munich and Stuttgart, job growth was heavily concentrated among professionals and managers. While second-tier cities such as Dortmund, Essen or Leipzig also created many professional jobs, they experienced almost as much growth in low-end jobs. We find no evidence that job polarisation is specific to the largest cities or that strong job growth among professionals is limited to a few winner-take-all cities such as London and Berlin.</p>","PeriodicalId":45469,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Labour Market Research","volume":"59 1","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12718246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Labour Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-025-00420-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An influential thesis predicted in the 1990s that large cities would become polarised as both high-wage professional and low-wage service jobs expanded at the expense of middle-wage workers. We revisit this thesis by analysing change in the occupational class structure of the ten largest cities in Germany and the UK, 1991-2021. Using UK census and German social security data (SIAB), we find for all cities strong job growth at the top - among professionals and managers -, moderate growth at the bottom - among service and sales workers - and a sharp decline in the middle - among office clerks and production workers. The result is occupational class upgrading with a polarised twist. Polarised upgrading was particularly strong in London, but also evident in Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester or Newcastle. German cities experienced similar levels of occupational upgrading, but less polarisation. Notably in Berlin, Munich and Stuttgart, job growth was heavily concentrated among professionals and managers. While second-tier cities such as Dortmund, Essen or Leipzig also created many professional jobs, they experienced almost as much growth in low-end jobs. We find no evidence that job polarisation is specific to the largest cities or that strong job growth among professionals is limited to a few winner-take-all cities such as London and Berlin.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两极分化升级:1991-2021年德国和英国大城市职业结构变化。
上世纪90年代,一篇颇具影响力的论文预测,随着高薪专业岗位和低薪服务岗位的扩张,大城市将出现两极分化,而牺牲的是中等工资的工人。我们通过分析1991-2021年德国和英国十大城市职业阶层结构的变化来重新审视这一论点。利用英国人口普查和德国社会保障数据(SIAB),我们发现,在所有城市中,高层(专业人士和管理人员)的就业岗位增长强劲,底层(服务和销售人员)的就业岗位增长温和,中层(办公室文员和生产工人)的就业岗位急剧下降。其结果是职业等级的升级伴随着两极分化的扭曲。两极分化升级在伦敦尤为明显,但在伯明翰、利物浦、曼彻斯特或纽卡斯尔也很明显。德国城市经历了类似的职业升级水平,但两极分化程度较低。尤其是在柏林、慕尼黑和斯图加特,就业增长主要集中在专业人士和管理人员身上。虽然多特蒙德(Dortmund)、埃森(Essen)或莱比锡(Leipzig)等二线城市也创造了许多专业岗位,但它们在低端岗位上的增长幅度几乎相同。我们发现,没有证据表明,就业两极分化只存在于大城市,也没有证据表明,专业人士的强劲就业增长仅限于伦敦和柏林等少数赢者通吃的城市。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Labour Market Research
Journal for Labour Market Research INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Labour Market Research is a journal in the interdisciplinary field of labour market research. As of 2016 the Journal publishes Open Access. The journal follows international research standards and strives for international visibility. With its empirical and multidisciplinary orientation, the journal publishes papers in English language concerning the labour market, employment, education / training and careers. Papers dealing with country-specific labour market aspects are suitable if they adopt an innovative approach and address a topic of interest to a wider international audience. The journal is distinct from most others in the field, as it provides a platform for contributions from a broad range of academic disciplines. The editors encourage replication studies, as well as studies based on international comparisons. Accordingly, authors are expected to make their empirical data available to readers who might wish to replicate a published work on request. Submitted papers, who have passed a prescreening process by the editors, are generally reviewed by two peer reviewers, who remain anonymous for the author. In addition to the regular issues, special issues covering selected topics are published at least once a year. As of April 2015 the Journal for Labour Market Research has a "No Revisions" option for submissions (see ‘Instructions for Authors’).
期刊最新文献
Reconceptualising labour utilisation and underutilisation with new 'full-time equivalent' employment and unemployment rates. Polarised upgrading: the changing occupational structure of large cities in Germany and the UK, 1991-2021. Literature review of comparative school-to-work research: how institutional settings shape individual labour market outcomes The COVID-19 pandemic: a threat to higher education? Evidence from a large university in Northern Italy The response of labour demand to different COVID-19 containment measures: evidence from online job postings in Austria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1