Workplace wellbeing for the general practice workforce across England: mapping current services.

IF 2.4 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2026-08-25 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0169
Lorna Hardy, Daniele Carrieri, Alex Aylward, Karen Mattick, Geoff Wong, Jane R Smith
{"title":"Workplace wellbeing for the general practice workforce across England: mapping current services.","authors":"Lorna Hardy, Daniele Carrieri, Alex Aylward, Karen Mattick, Geoff Wong, Jane R Smith","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rising prevalence of poor workplace wellbeing in healthcare practitioners has been defined as a global crisis, threatening the sustainability of healthcare systems and the quality of care. General practice staff in England are especially impacted, yet it is unclear how support for this workforce is delivered, and where accountability for this sits.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To map the provision of wellbeing strategies and interventions for the general practice workforce in England.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Survey and review of grey literature in contemporary England general practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We sent Freedom of Information (FOI) requests between 28 February 2025 and 12 March 2025 to all integrated care boards (ICBs) in England. We also sought existing information sources via targeted searches (for example, of professional organisation websites) and through engagement with relevant stakeholders, who also guided our methods, analysis, and dissemination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 42 ICBs in existence at the time responded to the FOI request. Responders' roles and responses varied widely, including the extent to which general practice staff wellbeing was seen as the responsibility of the ICB and whether or what wellbeing services were offered. We identified 139 wellbeing services available to general practice staff via the FOI and 53 via the targeted searches. In total, 79 of the services were reported as being primary care staff-specific. Most services appeared to be reactive and aimed at the individual level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study mapping workplace wellbeing services for the general practice workforce across England. Our results suggest there is an interest in staff wellbeing. More preventive approaches addressing systemic workplace wellbeing factors are now needed. Future research should evaluate the impacts of wellbeing support for the general practice workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2025.0169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The rising prevalence of poor workplace wellbeing in healthcare practitioners has been defined as a global crisis, threatening the sustainability of healthcare systems and the quality of care. General practice staff in England are especially impacted, yet it is unclear how support for this workforce is delivered, and where accountability for this sits.

Aim: To map the provision of wellbeing strategies and interventions for the general practice workforce in England.

Design & setting: Survey and review of grey literature in contemporary England general practice.

Method: We sent Freedom of Information (FOI) requests between 28 February 2025 and 12 March 2025 to all integrated care boards (ICBs) in England. We also sought existing information sources via targeted searches (for example, of professional organisation websites) and through engagement with relevant stakeholders, who also guided our methods, analysis, and dissemination.

Results: All 42 ICBs in existence at the time responded to the FOI request. Responders' roles and responses varied widely, including the extent to which general practice staff wellbeing was seen as the responsibility of the ICB and whether or what wellbeing services were offered. We identified 139 wellbeing services available to general practice staff via the FOI and 53 via the targeted searches. In total, 79 of the services were reported as being primary care staff-specific. Most services appeared to be reactive and aimed at the individual level.

Conclusion: This is the first study mapping workplace wellbeing services for the general practice workforce across England. Our results suggest there is an interest in staff wellbeing. More preventive approaches addressing systemic workplace wellbeing factors are now needed. Future research should evaluate the impacts of wellbeing support for the general practice workforce.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国全科医生的工作场所福利:绘制当前服务。
背景:卫生保健从业人员工作场所健康状况不佳的普遍现象已被定义为全球危机,威胁到卫生保健系统的可持续性和护理质量。英国的全科医生受到的影响尤其严重,但目前尚不清楚如何为这些员工提供支持,以及对此的责任在哪里。目的:为英格兰的全科医生提供健康策略和干预措施。设计与设置:当代英国全科医学灰色文献的调查与回顾。方法:我们在2025年2月28日至3月12日期间向英国所有综合护理委员会(icb)发送了信息自由(FOI)请求。我们还通过有针对性的搜索(如专业组织网站)和与相关利益相关者的接触来寻找现有的信息来源,他们也指导我们的方法、分析和传播。结果:当时存在的所有42个ICBs都响应了FOI请求。受访者的角色和回应差异很大,包括全科医生的福利在多大程度上被视为ICB的责任,以及是否/提供什么福利服务。我们通过《信息自由法》确定了139项全科医生可获得的福利服务,53项通过目标搜索确定。大多数服务似乎是被动的,针对的是个人层面。结论:这是第一项针对英国全科医生的工作场所健康服务的研究。我们的研究结果表明,人们对员工的福祉很感兴趣。现在需要更多的预防措施来解决系统性的工作场所健康因素。未来的研究应该评估福祉支持对全科医生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
GPs' perspectives on assessing vaping among adolescents without prior smoking history: a qualitative study within primary care. Workplace wellbeing for the general practice workforce across England: mapping current services. Factors affecting the likelihood of documented medication concerns in patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study in primary care. HATCHing plans: a qualitative study of how discharge communication can support expert generalist management. Co-locating frailty intervention activities and general practice: a qualitative study exploring experiences and perceptions of participants and delivery partners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1