Real-world relevance of multicriteria decision analysis applied to environmental problems: A critical review of operational research literature

IF 2.1 Q3 MANAGEMENT EURO Journal on Decision Processes Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ejdp.2026.100069
Judit Lienert
{"title":"Real-world relevance of multicriteria decision analysis applied to environmental problems: A critical review of operational research literature","authors":"Judit Lienert","doi":"10.1016/j.ejdp.2026.100069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This critical review analyzed 118 articles applying multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to environmental problems that were published in operational research (OR) journals. Main aim was to evaluate whether OR research is adequately treating real-world decision processes. Research questions emerged from analyzing 34 review articles covering mainly environmental literature. In contrast to this applied literature, results indicate that the field of OR is strong in uncertainty treatment. However, advanced modelling and analysis of temporal or spatial aspects was rare. Documentation of MCDA processes was often sketchy. Stakeholder engagement throughout decision-making processes was low. Main steps of MCDA were neglected, ranging from problem structuring, over preference elicitation, to discussing results with stakeholders. Future OR research could contribute substantially to solving todays’ pressing environmental problems by (i) improving applications to real-world decision processes; (ii) developing methods of stakeholder engagement and integrating soft-OR methods; (iii) applying behavioral OR for analyzing decision processes; (iv) supporting real-world implementation after MCDA; and (v) linking efforts across disciplines for proper documentation of practice interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44104,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Decision Processes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2193943826000026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This critical review analyzed 118 articles applying multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to environmental problems that were published in operational research (OR) journals. Main aim was to evaluate whether OR research is adequately treating real-world decision processes. Research questions emerged from analyzing 34 review articles covering mainly environmental literature. In contrast to this applied literature, results indicate that the field of OR is strong in uncertainty treatment. However, advanced modelling and analysis of temporal or spatial aspects was rare. Documentation of MCDA processes was often sketchy. Stakeholder engagement throughout decision-making processes was low. Main steps of MCDA were neglected, ranging from problem structuring, over preference elicitation, to discussing results with stakeholders. Future OR research could contribute substantially to solving todays’ pressing environmental problems by (i) improving applications to real-world decision processes; (ii) developing methods of stakeholder engagement and integrating soft-OR methods; (iii) applying behavioral OR for analyzing decision processes; (iv) supporting real-world implementation after MCDA; and (v) linking efforts across disciplines for proper documentation of practice interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用于环境问题的多标准决策分析的现实世界相关性:运筹学文献的批判性回顾
本文分析了发表在运筹学(OR)期刊上的118篇应用多标准决策分析(MCDA)研究环境问题的文章。主要目的是评估OR研究是否充分地处理了现实世界的决策过程。通过分析34篇主要涉及环境文献的综述文章,出现了研究问题。与这些应用文献相反,结果表明OR领域在不确定度处理方面很强。然而,对时间或空间方面的先进建模和分析是罕见的。MCDA过程的文档通常是粗略的。利益相关者在整个决策过程中的参与度很低。MCDA的主要步骤被忽略了,从问题结构,偏好的引出,到与利益相关者讨论结果。未来的OR研究可以通过以下方式为解决当今紧迫的环境问题做出重大贡献:(1)改进对现实世界决策过程的应用;(ii)开发利益相关者参与的方法并整合软or方法;(iii)运用行为OR分析决策过程;(iv)支持MCDA后的实际实施;(v)将跨学科的努力联系起来,以便对实践干预进行适当的记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
A stage-gate decision process for guiding the development of AI solutions for preventive maintenance Projecting decisions. Unfolding architectural design practice in decision-making processes Preferential knowledge for multi-criteria decision making: Stability and consistency of decision rules and weights Real-world relevance of multicriteria decision analysis applied to environmental problems: A critical review of operational research literature Electric vehicle purchase decision: A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1