Functional Understanding of Quantum Technologies is Essential to the Ethical Debate About Their Impact.

IF 2.4 4区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Nanoethics Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s11569-026-00501-7
Eline de Jong
{"title":"Functional Understanding of Quantum Technologies is Essential to the Ethical Debate About Their Impact.","authors":"Eline de Jong","doi":"10.1007/s11569-026-00501-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the innovative potential of quantum technologies comes into focus, so too does the urgent need to address their ethical implications. While many voices highlight the importance of ethical engagement, less attention has been paid to the conditions that make such engagement possible. In this article, I argue that one key condition is <i>technological understanding</i>: the cognitive skill to recognise how a technology can be used to realise an aim. More specifically, I claim that meaningful ethical discussion depends, first and foremost, on understanding a technology's functional capabilities: what it can do and what it can be used for. Presenting such 'functional understanding' as an epistemic requirement helps guide efforts to improve understanding of quantum technologies in support of ethical engagement. Such efforts often focus on explaining, in broad strokes, the underlying <i>physics</i> and technical details. While technical insights may indeed support ethical analysis, they are neither sufficient nor always necessary for grasping the broader societal and ethical implications of a technology. What is indispensable for such discussions is an understanding of its (potential) <i>functions.</i> To foster ethical engagement with quantum technologies, I therefore advocate a functions-oriented approach to promoting understanding of these technologies. At first glance, presenting technological understanding as an epistemic requirement for meaningful ethical engagement may seem to raise the bar for participation. However, by decoupling functional understanding from technical expertise, this condition becomes attainable for a broader group, contributing not only to a well-informed but also to a more inclusive ethical debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":18802,"journal":{"name":"Nanoethics","volume":"20 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13046613/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanoethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-026-00501-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the innovative potential of quantum technologies comes into focus, so too does the urgent need to address their ethical implications. While many voices highlight the importance of ethical engagement, less attention has been paid to the conditions that make such engagement possible. In this article, I argue that one key condition is technological understanding: the cognitive skill to recognise how a technology can be used to realise an aim. More specifically, I claim that meaningful ethical discussion depends, first and foremost, on understanding a technology's functional capabilities: what it can do and what it can be used for. Presenting such 'functional understanding' as an epistemic requirement helps guide efforts to improve understanding of quantum technologies in support of ethical engagement. Such efforts often focus on explaining, in broad strokes, the underlying physics and technical details. While technical insights may indeed support ethical analysis, they are neither sufficient nor always necessary for grasping the broader societal and ethical implications of a technology. What is indispensable for such discussions is an understanding of its (potential) functions. To foster ethical engagement with quantum technologies, I therefore advocate a functions-oriented approach to promoting understanding of these technologies. At first glance, presenting technological understanding as an epistemic requirement for meaningful ethical engagement may seem to raise the bar for participation. However, by decoupling functional understanding from technical expertise, this condition becomes attainable for a broader group, contributing not only to a well-informed but also to a more inclusive ethical debate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对量子技术的功能理解对其影响的伦理辩论至关重要。
随着量子技术的创新潜力成为人们关注的焦点,解决其伦理问题的紧迫性也越来越大。虽然许多声音强调道德参与的重要性,但很少有人关注使这种参与成为可能的条件。在本文中,我认为一个关键条件是技术理解:认识到如何使用技术来实现目标的认知技能。更具体地说,我认为有意义的伦理讨论首先取决于对技术功能的理解:它能做什么,它能被用来做什么。将这种“功能性理解”作为一种认识论要求,有助于指导人们努力提高对量子技术的理解,以支持伦理参与。这类努力通常侧重于概括地解释潜在的物理和技术细节。虽然技术见解可能确实支持伦理分析,但对于掌握一项技术的更广泛的社会和伦理影响,它们既不充分,也不总是必要的。这种讨论必不可少的是对其(潜在)功能的理解。因此,为了促进对量子技术的道德参与,我提倡以功能为导向的方法来促进对这些技术的理解。乍一看,将技术理解作为有意义的伦理参与的认识论要求,似乎提高了参与的门槛。然而,通过将功能理解与技术专长分离,这一条件可以为更广泛的群体实现,不仅有助于信息灵通,而且有助于更包容的伦理辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nanoethics
Nanoethics HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: NanoEthics: Ethics for Technologies that Converge at the Nanoscale will focus on the philosophically and scientifically rigorous examination of the ethical and societal considerations and the public and policy concerns inherent in nanotechnology research and development. These issues include both individual and societal problems, and include individual health, wellbeing and human enhancement, human integrity and autonomy, distribution of the costs and benefits, threats to culture and tradition and to political and economic stability. Additionally there are meta-issues including the neutrality or otherwise of technology, designing technology in a value-sensitive way, and the control of scientific research.
期刊最新文献
Bridging Integrative Medicine and AI: A Zhuangzian Perspective. Functional Understanding of Quantum Technologies is Essential to the Ethical Debate About Their Impact. Perception and reaction of undergraduate critical disability studies students to six short films depicting neuro-advancements. Normative Challenges of Risk Regulation of Artificial Intelligence An Integrated Embodiment Concept Combines Neuroethics and AI Ethics – Relational Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence, Emerging Neurotechnologies and the Future of Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1