首页 > 最新文献

Energy Research & Social Science最新文献

英文 中文
Rethinking the gender-energy nexus beyond the productive–reproductive binary: A mixed-methods study from rural Madagascar 重新思考超越生产-生殖二元关系的性别能量关系:一项来自马达加斯加农村的混合方法研究
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104609
Katharina Oemmelen , Ben Page , Tinasoa Rasoarimalala , Priti Parikh
It is well established that there is a gendered dimension to accessing, using and understanding renewable energies. Yet, few studies move beyond a ‘women-only’ focus to examine how rural electrification intersects with intra-household dynamics and socio-cultural norms in Sub-Saharan Africa. This paper applies an analytical gender lens (Peterson, 2005) to two rural Malagasy communities, drawing on 487 household surveys and six months of qualitative fieldwork. We investigate how access to electric light, appliances, and clean cooking technologies affects men's and women's time use, well-being, and household dynamics. Using a feminist approach that centres the voices of ordinary community members, we critically interrogate conventional gender-energy narratives that frame electrification as a straightforward pathway to reducing women's domestic burden. We argue that the productive-reproductive binary underpinning this rationale fails to capture the interwoven ways in which electricity is used in rural Malagasy households. Our findings show that higher-tier electricity access was associated with increased time spent on both paid and unpaid work – often undertaken in parallel and extending into the night - yet female respondents valued these changes for the greater practicality, autonomy, and agency they afforded. By moving beyond binary framings, this study advances novel insights into the gender-energy nexus and deepens our understanding of the interlinkages between SDG 5 and SDG 7.
众所周知,在获取、使用和理解可再生能源方面存在着性别层面。然而,很少有研究超越了“仅限女性”的重点,考察了撒哈拉以南非洲农村电气化如何与家庭内部动态和社会文化规范交叉。本文将分析性性别视角(Peterson, 2005)应用于马达加斯加的两个农村社区,利用487个家庭调查和六个月的定性实地调查。我们调查了电灯、电器和清洁烹饪技术的使用如何影响男性和女性的时间使用、幸福感和家庭动态。我们采用女权主义的方法,以普通社区成员的声音为中心,批判性地质疑传统的性别能量叙事,这些叙事将电气化视为减轻女性家庭负担的直接途径。我们认为,支撑这一理论的生产性和再生性二元概念未能捕捉到马达加斯加农村家庭用电的相互交织的方式。我们的研究结果表明,更高层次的电力供应与有偿和无偿工作花费的时间增加有关——通常是并行进行的,并延伸到晚上——然而女性受访者看重这些变化,因为它们提供了更大的实用性、自主性和能动性。通过超越二元框架,本研究对性别能量关系提出了新的见解,并加深了我们对可持续发展目标5和可持续发展目标7之间相互联系的理解。
{"title":"Rethinking the gender-energy nexus beyond the productive–reproductive binary: A mixed-methods study from rural Madagascar","authors":"Katharina Oemmelen ,&nbsp;Ben Page ,&nbsp;Tinasoa Rasoarimalala ,&nbsp;Priti Parikh","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104609","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104609","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is well established that there is a gendered dimension to accessing, using and understanding renewable energies. Yet, few studies move beyond a ‘women-only’ focus to examine how rural electrification intersects with intra-household dynamics and socio-cultural norms in Sub-Saharan Africa. This paper applies an <em>analytical gender lens</em> (Peterson, 2005) to two rural Malagasy communities, drawing on 487 household surveys and six months of qualitative fieldwork. We investigate how access to electric light, appliances, and clean cooking technologies affects men's and women's time use, well-being, and household dynamics. Using a feminist approach that centres the voices of ordinary community members, we critically interrogate conventional gender-energy narratives that frame electrification as a straightforward pathway to reducing women's domestic burden. We argue that the productive-reproductive binary underpinning this rationale fails to capture the interwoven ways in which electricity is used in rural Malagasy households. Our findings show that higher-tier electricity access was associated with increased time spent on both paid and unpaid work – often undertaken in parallel and extending into the night - yet female respondents valued these changes for the greater practicality, autonomy, and agency they afforded. By moving beyond binary framings, this study advances novel insights into the gender-energy nexus and deepens our understanding of the interlinkages between SDG 5 and SDG 7.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104609"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147401632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Glocalisation of hydrogen sociotechnical imaginaries in Poland - local technocratic scenarios to align with global transitions 波兰氢社会技术想象的全球化-与全球转型保持一致的当地技术官僚方案
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104607
Joanna Grudowska , Katarzyna Iwińska
Although Poland is the third-largest hydrogen producer in the European Union, it struggles to limit the carbon emissions in the process of its production and transform into low-carbon (green) hydrogen. Our investigation examines the dominant sociotechnical imaginaries of hydrogen technologies implementation in Poland and integrates them with the framework of glocalisation to reveal how hydrogen STIs operate outside core green hydrogen hubs. Through semi-structured expert interviews and the Delphi method, this study analyses how coexisting sociotechnical imaginaries shape Poland's emerging hydrogen green economy. The Delphi method is utilised to frame experts' perspectives on opportunities, risks, and implementation requirements as well as expected probabilities of the future developments. The research reveals three primary coexisting imaginaries that guide Poland's hydrogen development trajectory. Firstly, the technonationalist scenario prioritizes the development of domestic hydrogen technologies. Secondly, the State/Industry-Led scenario positions hydrogen as a transformative force for comprehensive economic modernisation while simultaneously strengthening Poland's technological competencies and thirdly, a mixed Bottom-Up and Top-Down perspective encompasses two governance approaches, balancing large-scale national initiatives with localised “hydrogen valleys” projects. The three scenarios explain the divergence and incoherence in implementing new technologies and might help diagnose conflicting priorities at the policy and governance levels. Poland's hydrogen sociotechnical imaginaries are fundamentally technocratic and technonationalist, framing hydrogen as a direct fuel substitute within existing centralised infrastructures and privileging institutional success metrics over social justice or grassroots participation. The global-local hydrogen energy transition is discussed in a peripheral context of Poland in the world and the technocratic–reformist hopes for technological-sovereignty in Europe.
虽然波兰是欧盟第三大氢气生产国,但它在生产过程中努力限制碳排放,向低碳(绿色)氢气转型。我们的调查考察了波兰氢技术实施的主要社会技术想象,并将其与全球化框架相结合,以揭示氢sti如何在核心绿色氢中心之外运作。通过半结构化的专家访谈和德尔菲法,本研究分析了共存的社会技术想象如何塑造波兰新兴的氢绿色经济。德尔菲法用于构建专家对机会、风险、实施要求以及未来发展的预期概率的观点。该研究揭示了指导波兰氢发展轨迹的三个主要共存的想象。首先,技术民族主义情景优先考虑国内氢技术的发展。其次,国家/行业主导的方案将氢定位为全面经济现代化的变革力量,同时加强波兰的技术能力。第三,自下而上和自上而下的混合视角包括两种治理方法,平衡大规模的国家倡议和本地化的“氢谷”项目。这三种情景解释了在实施新技术方面的分歧和不一致,并可能有助于诊断政策和治理级别上相互冲突的优先事项。波兰的氢社会技术想象从根本上来说是技术官僚和技术民族主义者,将氢作为现有集中式基础设施的直接燃料替代品,并将制度成功指标置于社会正义或基层参与之上。全球-地方氢能转型是在波兰的外围背景下讨论的,也是技术官僚-改革主义者对欧洲技术主权的希望。
{"title":"Glocalisation of hydrogen sociotechnical imaginaries in Poland - local technocratic scenarios to align with global transitions","authors":"Joanna Grudowska ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Iwińska","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104607","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104607","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although Poland is the third-largest hydrogen producer in the European Union, it struggles to limit the carbon emissions in the process of its production and transform into low-carbon (green) hydrogen. Our investigation examines the dominant sociotechnical imaginaries of hydrogen technologies implementation in Poland and integrates them with the framework of glocalisation to reveal how hydrogen STIs operate outside core green hydrogen hubs. Through semi-structured expert interviews and the Delphi method, this study analyses how coexisting sociotechnical imaginaries shape Poland's emerging hydrogen green economy. The Delphi method is utilised to frame experts' perspectives on opportunities, risks, and implementation requirements as well as expected probabilities of the future developments. The research reveals three primary coexisting imaginaries that guide Poland's hydrogen development trajectory. Firstly, the technonationalist scenario prioritizes the development of domestic hydrogen technologies. Secondly, the State/Industry-Led scenario positions hydrogen as a transformative force for comprehensive economic modernisation while simultaneously strengthening Poland's technological competencies and thirdly, a mixed Bottom-Up and Top-Down perspective encompasses two governance approaches, balancing large-scale national initiatives with localised “hydrogen valleys” projects. The three scenarios explain the divergence and incoherence in implementing new technologies and might help diagnose conflicting priorities at the policy and governance levels. Poland's hydrogen sociotechnical imaginaries are fundamentally technocratic and technonationalist, framing hydrogen as a direct fuel substitute within existing centralised infrastructures and privileging institutional success metrics over social justice or grassroots participation. The global-local hydrogen energy transition is discussed in a peripheral context of Poland in the world and the technocratic–reformist hopes for technological-sovereignty in Europe.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104607"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147401633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Beyond ownership structures: Oil company climate discourses in authoritarian Russia and Kazakhstan 超越所有权结构:专制的俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦的石油公司气候话语
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-05 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104582
Ellie Martus , Marianna Poberezhskaya , Marat Karatayev , Elena Novikova
Oil companies play a central role in global climate politics, yet existing research provides a limited understanding of how corporate climate strategies vary across ownership structures and political systems. This article addresses this gap though a comparative study of private and state-owned oil companies in Russia and Kazakhstan. Both are authoritarian states, major global oil producers, significant greenhouse gas emitters, and are highly dependent on fossil fuel exports. Using a most-similar system design, the analysis draws on an extensive range of publicly available corporate documents in English, Russian and Kazakh, to examine how oil companies (private and state-owned) have responded to climate change, and how these discourses interact with national climate agendas. Comparing discursive framings on climate change across countries and ownership types, the findings show that authoritarian state priorities strongly shape climate discourses, overshadowing differences generated by both private and state-owned companies. Unlike their Western counterparts that are driven primarily by financial and reputational interests, in Russia and Kazakhstan, both private and state-owned companies largely align their climate narratives with national political goals, limiting the scope for independent or market-driven climate positioning. Broadly, this article advances understanding of how political context shapes corporate climate behaviour. It demonstrates that in authoritarian fossil fuel states, national politics takes centre stage in structuring corporate engagement with climate change, with important implications for global climate governance.
石油公司在全球气候政治中发挥着核心作用,然而现有的研究对企业气候战略在不同所有权结构和政治制度下的变化提供了有限的理解。本文通过对俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦的私营和国有石油公司的比较研究来解决这一差距。两国都是专制国家,全球主要石油生产国,温室气体排放大国,高度依赖化石燃料出口。使用最相似的系统设计,该分析利用了广泛的公开公司文件,包括英语、俄语和哈萨克语,以研究石油公司(私营和国有)如何应对气候变化,以及这些话语如何与国家气候议程相互作用。通过比较不同国家和所有制类型的气候变化话语框架,研究结果表明,威权国家的优先事项强烈地影响了气候话语,掩盖了私营和国有企业产生的差异。与主要受金融和声誉利益驱动的西方同行不同,俄罗斯和哈萨克斯坦的私营和国有企业在很大程度上都将其气候叙事与国家政治目标相一致,限制了独立或市场驱动的气候定位的范围。从广义上讲,本文促进了对政治背景如何影响企业气候行为的理解。它表明,在专制的化石燃料国家,国家政治在组织企业参与气候变化方面处于中心地位,这对全球气候治理具有重要意义。
{"title":"Beyond ownership structures: Oil company climate discourses in authoritarian Russia and Kazakhstan","authors":"Ellie Martus ,&nbsp;Marianna Poberezhskaya ,&nbsp;Marat Karatayev ,&nbsp;Elena Novikova","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104582","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104582","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oil companies play a central role in global climate politics, yet existing research provides a limited understanding of how corporate climate strategies vary across ownership structures and political systems. This article addresses this gap though a comparative study of private and state-owned oil companies in Russia and Kazakhstan. Both are authoritarian states, major global oil producers, significant greenhouse gas emitters, and are highly dependent on fossil fuel exports. Using a most-similar system design, the analysis draws on an extensive range of publicly available corporate documents in English, Russian and Kazakh, to examine how oil companies (private and state-owned) have responded to climate change, and how these discourses interact with national climate agendas. Comparing discursive framings on climate change across countries and ownership types, the findings show that authoritarian state priorities strongly shape climate discourses, overshadowing differences generated by both private and state-owned companies. Unlike their Western counterparts that are driven primarily by financial and reputational interests, in Russia and Kazakhstan, both private and state-owned companies largely align their climate narratives with national political goals, limiting the scope for independent or market-driven climate positioning. Broadly, this article advances understanding of how political context shapes corporate climate behaviour. It demonstrates that in authoritarian fossil fuel states, national politics takes centre stage in structuring corporate engagement with climate change, with important implications for global climate governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104582"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146175079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
State versus private ownership: Local government preferences in wind power permitting in China 国有制与私有制:中国地方政府对风电许可的偏好
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104597
Zhipeng Ye , Mengye Zhu
State-owned enterprises (SOEs) have played a significant role in China's wind power development, dominating the majority of investment in the sector. Conventional wisdom suggests that SOEs receive preferential treatment from the government, crowding out private investment and hinder fair competition and economic efficiency. However, our study finds that the picture is more complicated. We focused on wind power permitting decisions made by local governments from 2011 to 2018 — a period historically significant for addressing our research questions —and employed a qualitative and quantitative mixed-methods approach. Our analysis highlights how local governments exercise discretion in ownership selection under China's state capitalism. This study reveals that local governments' preferences for SOEs or private investors are shaped by two empirically grounded factors: corruption risks and fiscal pressures. Specifically, under the institutional configuration of this period, corruption risks increase the likelihood that local governments select SOEs when the approval of private developers is more likely to trigger corruption allegations, while fiscal pressures increase the likelihood of choosing private investors as a means of alleviating fiscal constraints. These findings contribute to the political economy of renewable energy development by showing how ownership preferences are contingent rather than fixed, and by elucidating the role of local governments in mediating state–market relations through permitting decisions.
国有企业在中国风电发展中发挥了重要作用,主导了该行业的大部分投资。传统观点认为,国有企业受到政府的优惠待遇,排挤了私人投资,阻碍了公平竞争和经济效率。然而,我们的研究发现情况要复杂得多。我们将重点放在2011年至2018年地方政府做出的风电许可决定上,这一时期对解决我们的研究问题具有历史意义,并采用了定性和定量混合方法。我们的分析强调了在中国国家资本主义制度下,地方政府如何在所有权选择上行使自由裁量权。该研究表明,地方政府对国有企业或私人投资者的偏好受到两个实证因素的影响:腐败风险和财政压力。具体而言,在这一时期的制度配置下,腐败风险增加了地方政府选择国有企业的可能性,而批准私人开发商更容易引发腐败指控,而财政压力增加了地方政府选择私人投资者作为缓解财政约束手段的可能性。这些发现有助于可再生能源发展的政治经济学,表明所有权偏好是偶然的,而不是固定的,并阐明了地方政府在通过许可决定调解国家-市场关系中的作用。
{"title":"State versus private ownership: Local government preferences in wind power permitting in China","authors":"Zhipeng Ye ,&nbsp;Mengye Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104597","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104597","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>State-owned enterprises (SOEs) have played a significant role in China's wind power development, dominating the majority of investment in the sector. Conventional wisdom suggests that SOEs receive preferential treatment from the government, crowding out private investment and hinder fair competition and economic efficiency. However, our study finds that the picture is more complicated. We focused on wind power permitting decisions made by local governments from 2011 to 2018 — a period historically significant for addressing our research questions —and employed a qualitative and quantitative mixed-methods approach. Our analysis highlights how local governments exercise discretion in ownership selection under China's state capitalism. This study reveals that local governments' preferences for SOEs or private investors are shaped by two empirically grounded factors: corruption risks and fiscal pressures. Specifically, under the institutional configuration of this period, corruption risks increase the likelihood that local governments select SOEs when the approval of private developers is more likely to trigger corruption allegations, while fiscal pressures increase the likelihood of choosing private investors as a means of alleviating fiscal constraints. These findings contribute to the political economy of renewable energy development by showing how ownership preferences are contingent rather than fixed, and by elucidating the role of local governments in mediating state–market relations through permitting decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104597"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146174630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An inevitable future? The debate over mining for critical raw materials on Indigenous Sámi lands—A critical discourse analysis of Swedish news media 不可避免的未来?关于在Sámi原住民土地上开采关键原材料的争论——瑞典新闻媒体的批评性话语分析
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104574
Leslie Spitz-Edson
Some global north countries, including Sweden, are pursuing plans to onshore critical raw material (CRM) mining for the energy transition. However, in northern Sweden, where CRM deposits are found, their extraction threatens Indigenous Sámi land rights and livelihoods including reindeer husbandry. Under the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Sweden is bound to protect Sámi land and livelihoods. Swedish society debates this conflict in part through the news media.
Globally, extraction of minerals often occurs on or near Indigenous territories. Focusing on Indigenous people in Sweden, this study enriches understanding of issues relating to Indigenous peoples in the global north.
This study uses critical discourse analysis to examine Swedish newspaper reporting on specific CRM mining projects from 2013 to 2023. Informed by scholarship on representations of Indigenous peoples, extractive industry, and the energy transition, this study examines how journalists represent the Sámi people in relation to the mining industry, the state and society, and the energy transition, and considers how these representations might relate to public debate about climate solutions.
The analysis finds that the Sámi people are often depicted as opposed to the interests of Swedish society, including the extraction of CRMs deemed to be national and geopolitical necessities. Embedded discourses, including the assumption that the Sámi have a responsibility to allow extractive development and the narrative that Sámi lands are empty and underused, support the establishment of mines. Finally, an ambivalence regarding Sámi cultural distinctiveness may endanger their rights claims and impoverish Swedish society's deliberation of possible futures.
包括瑞典在内的一些全球北方国家正在推行陆上关键原材料(CRM)开采计划,以实现能源转型。然而,在瑞典北部发现的稀土矿床,其开采威胁到土著Sámi土地权利和包括驯鹿饲养在内的生计。根据《联合国土著人民权利宣言》,瑞典有义务保护Sámi土地和生计。瑞典社会在某种程度上通过新闻媒体讨论这一冲突。在全球范围内,矿物的开采通常发生在土著领土上或附近。本研究以瑞典土著人民为重点,丰富了对全球北方土著人民相关问题的理解。本研究使用批判性话语分析来研究瑞典报纸从2013年到2023年对特定CRM采矿项目的报道。通过对土著人民、采掘业和能源转型的研究,本研究考察了记者如何在采矿业、国家和社会以及能源转型方面代表Sámi人民,并考虑了这些代表如何与关于气候解决方案的公共辩论联系起来。分析发现Sámi人经常被描绘成反对瑞典社会的利益,包括提取被认为是国家和地缘政治必需品的crm。根深蒂固的话语,包括Sámi有责任允许采掘发展的假设和Sámi土地是空的和未充分利用的叙述,支持建立矿山。最后,关于Sámi文化独特性的矛盾心理可能危及他们的权利主张,并使瑞典社会对可能的未来的审议变得贫瘠。
{"title":"An inevitable future? The debate over mining for critical raw materials on Indigenous Sámi lands—A critical discourse analysis of Swedish news media","authors":"Leslie Spitz-Edson","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104574","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104574","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Some global north countries, including Sweden, are pursuing plans to onshore critical raw material (CRM) mining for the energy transition. However, in northern Sweden, where CRM deposits are found, their extraction threatens Indigenous Sámi land rights and livelihoods including reindeer husbandry. Under the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Sweden is bound to protect Sámi land and livelihoods. Swedish society debates this conflict in part through the news media.</div><div>Globally, extraction of minerals often occurs on or near Indigenous territories. Focusing on Indigenous people in Sweden, this study enriches understanding of issues relating to Indigenous peoples in the global north.</div><div>This study uses critical discourse analysis to examine Swedish newspaper reporting on specific CRM mining projects from 2013 to 2023. Informed by scholarship on representations of Indigenous peoples, extractive industry, and the energy transition, this study examines how journalists represent the Sámi people in relation to the mining industry, the state and society, and the energy transition, and considers how these representations might relate to public debate about climate solutions.</div><div>The analysis finds that the Sámi people are often depicted as opposed to the interests of Swedish society, including the extraction of CRMs deemed to be national and geopolitical necessities. Embedded discourses, including the assumption that the Sámi have a responsibility to allow extractive development and the narrative that Sámi lands are empty and underused, support the establishment of mines. Finally, an ambivalence regarding Sámi cultural distinctiveness may endanger their rights claims and impoverish Swedish society's deliberation of possible futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104574"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146174638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deliberate destabilization on trial: Fair-process lessons from the Czech Coal Commission 审判中的蓄意破坏稳定:捷克煤炭委员会的公平程序教训
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104573
Filip Černoch, Michaela Hronová, Lukáš Lehotský
Expert commissions have become pivotal in coal-phase-out governance, yet their capacity to unsettle incumbent coal regimes remains contested: do they genuinely shift entrenched power relations or merely create an illusion of participatory legitimacy? Drawing on energy-justice and transition studies, this article approaches the issue from the perspective of procedural justice and assumes this tenet of justice is crucial in shaping the outcome of an institutionally induced destabilization. We develop a four-part framework of procedural justice – member selection, stakeholder balance, deliberative conditions, and public transparency – and apply this framework to the Czech Coal Commission (2019–2021), which was established as an expert body tasked with establishing the coal phase-out schedule. Our results show that the Czech Coal Commission was blatantly procedurally unjust. Discretionary appointments, industry-leaning membership, and compressed timelines that circumscribed substantive deliberation ultimately enabled coal incumbents to retain power over the outcome. This case underscores that rigorous procedural design is a necessary precondition for commissions to function as effective agents of destabilization within fossil-fuel regimes, and that design choices must be addressed if similar bodies are to support credible and socially legitimate coal exits.
专家委员会已成为淘汰煤炭治理的关键,但它们扰乱现有煤炭政权的能力仍存在争议:它们是真的改变了根深蒂固的权力关系,还是仅仅创造了一种参与性合法性的幻觉?利用能源正义和过渡研究,本文从程序正义的角度探讨了这一问题,并假设这一正义原则在形成由制度引起的不稳定的结果方面至关重要。我们制定了一个由四部分组成的程序正义框架——成员选择、利益相关者平衡、审议条件和公共透明度——并将该框架应用于捷克煤炭委员会(2019-2021),该委员会是一个负责制定煤炭淘汰时间表的专家机构。我们的结果表明,捷克煤炭委员会在程序上明显不公正。自由裁量任命、倾向于行业的成员以及限制实质性审议的压缩时间表,最终使煤炭企业保留了对结果的控制权。这个案例强调,严格的程序设计是委员会在化石燃料制度中发挥破坏稳定的有效作用的必要先决条件,如果类似的机构要支持可信和社会上合法的煤炭退出,就必须解决设计选择问题。
{"title":"Deliberate destabilization on trial: Fair-process lessons from the Czech Coal Commission","authors":"Filip Černoch,&nbsp;Michaela Hronová,&nbsp;Lukáš Lehotský","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104573","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104573","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Expert commissions have become pivotal in coal-phase-out governance, yet their capacity to unsettle incumbent coal regimes remains contested: do they genuinely shift entrenched power relations or merely create an illusion of participatory legitimacy? Drawing on energy-justice and transition studies, this article approaches the issue from the perspective of procedural justice and assumes this tenet of justice is crucial in shaping the outcome of an institutionally induced destabilization. We develop a four-part framework of procedural justice – member selection, stakeholder balance, deliberative conditions, and public transparency – and apply this framework to the Czech Coal Commission (2019–2021), which was established as an expert body tasked with establishing the coal phase-out schedule. Our results show that the Czech Coal Commission was blatantly procedurally unjust. Discretionary appointments, industry-leaning membership, and compressed timelines that circumscribed substantive deliberation ultimately enabled coal incumbents to retain power over the outcome. This case underscores that rigorous procedural design is a necessary precondition for commissions to function as effective agents of destabilization within fossil-fuel regimes, and that design choices must be addressed if similar bodies are to support credible and socially legitimate coal exits.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104573"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146175093","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Energy poverty and unpaid work: Evidence from rural China 能源贫困和无偿工作:来自中国农村的证据
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104596
Yiyi Zhao , Sonia Akter , Jane Golley
This study is the first to investigate the impact of energy poverty on unpaid labour in rural China, utilising a five-year panel dataset spanning from 2014 to 2022. The analysis demonstrates that energy poverty contributes an additional 4.3 to 6.1 min of daily household work for rural adults in China before the COVID-19 pandemic. Households affected by energy poverty bear a greater burden of unpaid household work compared to energy-affluent households, particularly affecting women in households that rely heavily on self-produced agricultural goods for subsistence and mothers with preschool-aged children. Factors such as a lack of household appliances, limited access to agricultural machinery and poor health status are strongly linked to increased household work burdens for these households. Additional analysis indicates that, following COVID-19 disruptions in 2022, rural individuals facing energy constraints experienced a greater increase in daily household work compared to previous years.
These findings highlight disparities in unpaid labour across agricultural and non-agricultural households, between households using solid versus clean cooking fuels, and by gender. The study underscores the intersection of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 5 (gender equality and women's empowerment) and 7 (affordable and clean energy) and emphasises the critical need to address energy poverty in agriculture-reliant rural areas to improve women's welfare by reducing unpaid work.
这项研究首次调查了能源贫困对中国农村无偿劳动力的影响,利用了从2014年到2022年的五年面板数据集。分析表明,在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前,能源贫困为中国农村成年人每天额外贡献了4.3至6.1分钟的家务劳动。与能源富裕的家庭相比,受能源贫穷影响的家庭承担了更大的无偿家务劳动负担,特别是严重依赖自产农产品的家庭中的妇女和有学龄前儿童的母亲。缺乏家用电器、获得农业机械的机会有限以及健康状况不佳等因素与这些家庭家务负担的增加密切相关。其他分析表明,在2022年2019冠状病毒病中断之后,面临能源限制的农村个人的日常家务劳动比前几年增加了很多。这些调查结果突出了农业和非农业家庭、使用固体燃料和清洁烹饪燃料的家庭以及性别之间在无偿劳动方面的差异。该研究强调了可持续发展目标(sdg) 5(性别平等和妇女赋权)和7(负担得起的清洁能源)的交集,并强调迫切需要解决依赖农业的农村地区的能源贫困问题,通过减少无偿工作来改善妇女的福利。
{"title":"Energy poverty and unpaid work: Evidence from rural China","authors":"Yiyi Zhao ,&nbsp;Sonia Akter ,&nbsp;Jane Golley","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104596","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104596","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study is the first to investigate the impact of energy poverty on unpaid labour in rural China, utilising a five-year panel dataset spanning from 2014 to 2022. The analysis demonstrates that energy poverty contributes an additional 4.3 to 6.1 min of daily household work for rural adults in China before the COVID-19 pandemic. Households affected by energy poverty bear a greater burden of unpaid household work compared to energy-affluent households, particularly affecting women in households that rely heavily on self-produced agricultural goods for subsistence and mothers with preschool-aged children. Factors such as a lack of household appliances, limited access to agricultural machinery and poor health status are strongly linked to increased household work burdens for these households. Additional analysis indicates that, following COVID-19 disruptions in 2022, rural individuals facing energy constraints experienced a greater increase in daily household work compared to previous years.</div><div>These findings highlight disparities in unpaid labour across agricultural and non-agricultural households, between households using solid versus clean cooking fuels, and by gender. The study underscores the intersection of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 5 (gender equality and women's empowerment) and 7 (affordable and clean energy) and emphasises the critical need to address energy poverty in agriculture-reliant rural areas to improve women's welfare by reducing unpaid work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104596"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147401660","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A critical meta-survey of the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of hydrogen energy systems 氢能源系统生命周期温室气体排放的关键元调查
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-14 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104461
Benjamin K. Sovacool , Steve Griffiths , Kyle Herman , Marfuga Iskandarova
Hydrogen energy systems are central to decarbonization strategies, yet their full climatic footprint remains contested. Lifecycle assessments reveal significant variability influenced by feedstock choices, energy inputs, and production processes. This paper conducts a meta-survey to examine assumptions behind varying estimations and identify improvement areas. We analyzed 653 academic studies, applying rigorous exclusion criteria to extract 906 estimations across ten lifecycle stages from 109 peer-reviewed studies covering 90 % of global hydrogen production over 2000–2024. We calculated emissions intensities based on grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt-hour (gCO2e/kWh) and kilograms per kilogram of hydrogen produced (kgCO2e/kgH2), disaggregating estimates by hydrogen “colors” (turquoise, blue, green, etc.) based on different energy inputs. Results indicate median carbon footprints for production alone of 164.3 gCO2e/kWh or 5.5 kgCO2e/kgH2. Full lifecycle accounting—including upstream sourcing, conversion, storage, distribution, end-use, and decommissioning—increases total median footprints to 435.4 gCO2e/kWh or 15.2 kgCO2e/kgH2. Mean values are significantly higher (1038.4 gCO2e/kWh and 34.5 kgCO2e/kgH2), highlighting extreme outliers' impact. Key variability sources include process type, energy inputs, sectoral application, geographic location, leakage rates, and system capacity. We identify gaps in lifecycle methodologies, particularly system boundary definitions, reporting standards, and end-of-life infrastructure treatment. The findings challenge generic assumptions about hydrogen's climate benefits and emphasize the need for granular, pathway-specific analysis in policy, investment, and modeling decisions.
氢能系统是脱碳战略的核心,但其全部气候足迹仍存在争议。生命周期评估揭示了受原料选择、能源投入和生产过程影响的显著变异性。本文进行了一项元调查,以检查不同估计背后的假设,并确定改进的领域。我们分析了653项学术研究,采用严格的排除标准,从109项同行评审的研究中提取了906项横跨10个生命周期阶段的估计,这些研究涵盖了2000年至2024年全球90%的氢气产量。我们根据每千瓦时二氧化碳当量的克数(gCO2e/kWh)和每千克氢气产生的千克数(kgCO2e/kgH2)计算排放强度,并根据不同的能量输入按氢气的“颜色”(绿松石色、蓝色、绿色等)进行分类估算。结果表明,仅生产的中位数碳足迹为164.3 gCO2e/kWh或5.5 kgCO2e/kgH2。全生命周期核算——包括上游采购、转换、储存、分销、最终使用和退役——将总碳足迹中位数增加到435.4 gCO2e/kWh或15.2 kgCO2e/kgH2。平均值明显更高(1038.4 gCO2e/kWh和34.5 kgCO2e/kgH2),突出了极端异常值的影响。关键的可变性来源包括工艺类型、能源输入、部门应用、地理位置、泄漏率和系统容量。我们确定生命周期方法中的差距,特别是系统边界定义、报告标准和生命周期结束的基础设施处理。这些发现挑战了关于氢的气候效益的一般假设,并强调在政策、投资和建模决策中需要进行细致的、具体途径的分析。
{"title":"A critical meta-survey of the lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of hydrogen energy systems","authors":"Benjamin K. Sovacool ,&nbsp;Steve Griffiths ,&nbsp;Kyle Herman ,&nbsp;Marfuga Iskandarova","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104461","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104461","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Hydrogen energy systems are central to decarbonization strategies, yet their full climatic footprint remains contested. Lifecycle assessments reveal significant variability influenced by feedstock choices, energy inputs, and production processes. This paper conducts a meta-survey to examine assumptions behind varying estimations and identify improvement areas. We analyzed 653 academic studies, applying rigorous exclusion criteria to extract 906 estimations across ten lifecycle stages from 109 peer-reviewed studies covering 90 % of global hydrogen production over 2000–2024. We calculated emissions intensities based on grams of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatt-hour (gCO<sub>2</sub>e/kWh) and kilograms per kilogram of hydrogen produced (kgCO<sub>2</sub>e/kgH<sub>2</sub>), disaggregating estimates by hydrogen “colors” (turquoise, blue, green, etc.) based on different energy inputs. Results indicate median carbon footprints for production alone of 164.3 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/kWh or 5.5 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e/kgH<sub>2</sub>. Full lifecycle accounting—including upstream sourcing, conversion, storage, distribution, end-use, and decommissioning—increases total median footprints to 435.4 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/kWh or 15.2 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e/kgH<sub>2</sub>. Mean values are significantly higher (1038.4 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/kWh and 34.5 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e/kgH<sub>2</sub>), highlighting extreme outliers' impact. Key variability sources include process type, energy inputs, sectoral application, geographic location, leakage rates, and system capacity. We identify gaps in lifecycle methodologies, particularly system boundary definitions, reporting standards, and end-of-life infrastructure treatment. The findings challenge generic assumptions about hydrogen's climate benefits and emphasize the need for granular, pathway-specific analysis in policy, investment, and modeling decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104461"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147702952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Critical mapping of the energy-gender nexus: From “sex disaggregation” to “doing gender equality” 能量-性别关系的关键映射:从“性别分解”到“实现性别平等”
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104615
Harshavardhan Jatkar , Sarah Bradshaw , Karla Cedano , Rebeca Cruz , Harry Kennard , Manuel Martinez , Karla Ricalde , Harriet Thomson , Julia Tomei , Ian Hamilton
Existing energy research is frequently criticised for its lack of gender sensitivity and for reproducing masculine biases. While literature exploring energy and gender is growing, there remains a significant gap in understanding how these fields precisely interact. Exploring this intersection is important to advance the agenda for gender equality in energy research, policy and practice. This article presents a systematic review of papers published on the topic from 1991 to 2021, employing a novel two-stage interdisciplinary approach: a quantitative bibliometric mapping of literature, concepts, and methods, followed by a qualitative analysis of selected studies through a critical gender lens.
The results reveal that while publications are increasing, the field is dominated by quantitative methods and often treats gender as synonymous with biological sex, failing to engage with critical gender theories. Importantly, the review highlights that energy–gender research is often conducted by scholars with limited engagement with gender theory, leading to research that frequently reinforces, rather than challenges, gender stereotypes. A small number of studies adopting feminist or queer perspectives illustrate how alternative theories of gender can enrich energy research. Considering these limitations, we argue for the advancement of a transformative energy agenda by shifting from analyzing sex-disaggregated data to “doing gender equality”. We conclude with eight procedural and thematic recommendations, including the necessity of interdisciplinary teams that include gender scholars, the adoption of qualitative methods to capture lived experiences, and a commitment to challenging gender stereotypes and incorporating alternative gender theories within energy research.
现有的能源研究经常因缺乏性别敏感性和再现男性偏见而受到批评。虽然探索能量和性别的文献越来越多,但在理解这些领域如何精确地相互作用方面仍然存在重大差距。探索这一交叉点对于推进能源研究、政策和实践中的性别平等议程非常重要。本文系统回顾了1991年至2021年期间发表的有关该主题的论文,采用了一种新的两阶段跨学科方法:对文献、概念和方法进行定量文献计量测绘,然后通过关键的性别视角对选定的研究进行定性分析。结果表明,虽然出版物在增加,但该领域仍以定量方法为主,往往将性别视为生物性别的同义词,未能参与批判性的性别理论。重要的是,这篇综述强调,能源性别研究通常是由对性别理论接触有限的学者进行的,这导致研究经常强化而不是挑战性别刻板印象。少数采用女权主义或酷儿观点的研究说明了另类性别理论如何丰富能源研究。考虑到这些限制,我们主张通过从分析按性别分类的数据转向“实现性别平等”来推进变革性能源议程。最后,我们提出了八项程序性和专题性建议,包括建立包括性别学者在内的跨学科团队的必要性,采用定性方法捕捉生活经验,以及致力于挑战性别刻板印象并将替代性别理论纳入能源研究。
{"title":"Critical mapping of the energy-gender nexus: From “sex disaggregation” to “doing gender equality”","authors":"Harshavardhan Jatkar ,&nbsp;Sarah Bradshaw ,&nbsp;Karla Cedano ,&nbsp;Rebeca Cruz ,&nbsp;Harry Kennard ,&nbsp;Manuel Martinez ,&nbsp;Karla Ricalde ,&nbsp;Harriet Thomson ,&nbsp;Julia Tomei ,&nbsp;Ian Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104615","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104615","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing energy research is frequently criticised for its lack of gender sensitivity and for reproducing masculine biases. While literature exploring energy and gender is growing, there remains a significant gap in understanding how these fields precisely interact. Exploring this intersection is important to advance the agenda for gender equality in energy research, policy and practice. This article presents a systematic review of papers published on the topic from 1991 to 2021, employing a novel two-stage interdisciplinary approach: a quantitative bibliometric mapping of literature, concepts, and methods, followed by a qualitative analysis of selected studies through a critical gender lens.</div><div>The results reveal that while publications are increasing, the field is dominated by quantitative methods and often treats gender as synonymous with biological sex, failing to engage with critical gender theories. Importantly, the review highlights that energy–gender research is often conducted by scholars with limited engagement with gender theory, leading to research that frequently reinforces, rather than challenges, gender stereotypes. A small number of studies adopting feminist or queer perspectives illustrate how alternative theories of gender can enrich energy research. Considering these limitations, we argue for the advancement of a transformative energy agenda by shifting from analyzing sex-disaggregated data to “doing gender equality”. We conclude with eight procedural and thematic recommendations, including the necessity of interdisciplinary teams that include gender scholars, the adoption of qualitative methods to capture lived experiences, and a commitment to challenging gender stereotypes and incorporating alternative gender theories within energy research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104615"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147401699","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Responsibilized and powerless? Unpacking the individualization of climate mitigation 有责任却无能为力?解析气候减缓的个体化
IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2026.104585
Gulnaz Anjum , Mudassar Aziz
Over recent decades, climate mitigation discourse in Western democracies has increasingly emphasized individual lifestyle choices alongside continued structural reforms. This trend is commonly described as the “individualization of responsibility.” This perspective paper offers a critical interdisciplinary synthesis examining how this discursive shift operates, whom it serves, and what it obscures. We critically examine the rise of individual-focused climate strategies, such as carbon footprint tracking, behavioral nudges, and voluntary consumption shifts, and synthesize evidence on their documented efficacy. Drawing from climate psychology, political science, sociology, and environmental justice perspectives, we analyze how neoliberal governance has recast citizens as climate-conscious consumers while diffusing accountability from state and corporate actors. We argue that “responsibilization” can activate certain forms of individual agency while constraining others. When detached from structural transformation, it risks reinforcing social inequalities and weakening collective political engagement. The article advances an integrated, justice-informed conceptual framework, the Responsibility-Power-Justice (RPJ) nexus, that repositions individual action within systems of structural accountability. We emphasize that equitable and effective climate action requires coupling behavioral insights with ambitious, justice-oriented policy reform. Aligning responsibility with power and capacity is essential to avoid responsibilization without empowerment and to achieve the scale of transformation the climate crisis demands.
近几十年来,在西方民主国家,缓解气候变化的论述越来越强调个人生活方式的选择以及持续的结构性改革。这种趋势通常被描述为“责任的个体化”。这篇观点论文提供了一个批判性的跨学科综合研究这种话语转移是如何运作的,它为谁服务,以及它掩盖了什么。我们批判性地研究了以个人为中心的气候策略的兴起,如碳足迹跟踪、行为推动和自愿消费转变,并综合了其记录有效性的证据。从气候心理学、政治学、社会学和环境正义的角度出发,我们分析了新自由主义治理如何将公民重塑为具有气候意识的消费者,同时分散了国家和企业行动者的问责制。我们认为,“责任”可以激活某些形式的个人代理,同时约束其他形式的个人代理。如果脱离结构转型,它就有可能加剧社会不平等,削弱集体政治参与。本文提出了一个综合的、公正的概念框架,即责任-权力-正义(RPJ)关系,它在结构问责制中重新定位个人行为。我们强调,公平和有效的气候行动需要将行为洞察力与雄心勃勃、以正义为导向的政策改革相结合。将责任与权力和能力结合起来,对于避免没有授权的责任和实现气候危机所要求的大规模转型至关重要。
{"title":"Responsibilized and powerless? Unpacking the individualization of climate mitigation","authors":"Gulnaz Anjum ,&nbsp;Mudassar Aziz","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104585","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.erss.2026.104585","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over recent decades, climate mitigation discourse in Western democracies has increasingly emphasized individual lifestyle choices alongside continued structural reforms. This trend is commonly described as the “individualization of responsibility.” This perspective paper offers a critical interdisciplinary synthesis examining how this discursive shift operates, whom it serves, and what it obscures. We critically examine the rise of individual-focused climate strategies, such as carbon footprint tracking, behavioral nudges, and voluntary consumption shifts, and synthesize evidence on their documented efficacy. Drawing from climate psychology, political science, sociology, and environmental justice perspectives, we analyze how neoliberal governance has recast citizens as climate-conscious consumers while diffusing accountability from state and corporate actors. We argue that “responsibilization” can activate certain forms of individual agency while constraining others. When detached from structural transformation, it risks reinforcing social inequalities and weakening collective political engagement. The article advances an integrated, justice-informed conceptual framework, the Responsibility-Power-Justice (RPJ) nexus, that repositions individual action within systems of structural accountability. We emphasize that equitable and effective climate action requires coupling behavioral insights with ambitious, justice-oriented policy reform. Aligning responsibility with power and capacity is essential to avoid responsibilization without empowerment and to achieve the scale of transformation the climate crisis demands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104585"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146174682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1