首页 > 最新文献

The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology最新文献

英文 中文
Type 2 diabetes management: weekly combination therapy comes of age? 2型糖尿病管理:每周联合治疗是否成熟?
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-13 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00165-8
Srikanth Bellary, Muhammad Ali Karamat, Anthony H Barnett
{"title":"Type 2 diabetes management: weekly combination therapy comes of age?","authors":"Srikanth Bellary, Muhammad Ali Karamat, Anthony H Barnett","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00165-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00165-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148764029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Once-weekly IcoSema versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes management (COMBINE 4): an open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, randomised, phase 3b trial. 每周一次IcoSema与每日一次甘精胰岛素U100治疗2型糖尿病(COMBINE 4):一项开放标签、多中心、治疗到靶点、随机、3b期试验。
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-13 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00136-1
Linong Ji, Malik Benamar, Viswanathan Mohan, Laura Pletsch-Borba, Francesca Porcellati, Ni Wang, Hirotaka Watada, Rosangela R Rea
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stepwise treatment intensification is recommended for managing type 2 diabetes, including insulin initiation when non-insulin glucose-lowering medications are insufficient. Guidelines recommend combining a GLP-1 receptor agonist with basal insulin to improve glycaemic efficacy while reducing weight gain and hypoglycaemia risk. COMBINE 4 evaluated the efficacy and safety of IcoSema, a once-weekly combination therapy of basal insulin icodec and semaglutide (a GLP-1-receptor agonist) versus insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100) in people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>COMBINE 4 was a 40-week, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target, phase 3b trial conducted across 97 sites in nine countries. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes (HbA<sub>1c</sub> ≥8·0%) receiving oral glucose-lowering medications were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio without stratification to IcoSema or once-daily glargine U100. The titration target was 3·9-5·0 mmol/L (70-90 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> and the secondary confirmatory endpoint was change in bodyweight, both from baseline to week 40, evaluated in all randomly allocated participants. Adverse events were recorded during weeks 0-45. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06269107) and is complete.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of 653 individuals screened between Feb 15 and Aug 6, 2024, 151 did not meet screening criteria and 17 withdrew before initiating treatment; 243 were randomised to IcoSema and 242 to glargine U100. Of the 485 randomly allocated participants, 286 (59%) were male and 199 (41%) were female, and median age was 58 years (range 26-82). For HbA<sub>1c</sub>, from baseline (9·57% for IcoSema and 9·50% for glargine U100), mean change to week 40 was greater with IcoSema versus glargine U100 (-3·32 vs -2·44 percentage points; estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0·88 percentage points [95% CI -1·12 to -0·63]), confirming superiority of IcoSema (p<0·001). From baseline to week 40, mean bodyweight decreased with IcoSema and increased with glargine U100 (-0·79 vs 3·81 kg; ETD -4·61 kg [95% CI -5·46 to -3·75]), confirming superiority of IcoSema (p<0·001). Rate of combined clinically significant (blood glucose <3·0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL], confirmed with a blood glucose meter) or severe hypoglycaemia (severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery) was statistically significantly lower with IcoSema versus glargine U100 (0·29 vs 0·59 episodes per person-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 0·56 [95% CI 0·32 to 0·97]; p=0·04). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported adverse events with IcoSema.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Once-weekly IcoSema demonstrated superior HbA<sub>1c</sub> reduction and bodyweight change, with lower rates of clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia, versus glargine U100, suggesting that I
背景:建议对2型糖尿病进行逐步强化治疗,包括在非胰岛素降糖药物不足时开始使用胰岛素。指南推荐GLP-1受体激动剂与基础胰岛素联合使用,以改善降糖疗效,同时减少体重增加和低血糖风险。COMBINE 4评估了IcoSema的有效性和安全性,IcoSema是一种每周一次的基础胰岛素icodec和semaglutide(一种glp -1受体激动剂)与甘精胰岛素U100(甘精胰岛素U100)联合治疗口服降糖药物的2型糖尿病患者。方法:COMBINE 4是一项为期40周、随机、开放标签、治疗到靶点的3b期试验,在9个国家的97个地点进行。接受口服降糖药物治疗的2型糖尿病(HbA1c≥8.0%)成人(年龄≥18岁)按1:1的比例随机分配至IcoSema组或每日一次甘精U100组,无分层。滴定目标为3.9 ~ 5.0 mmol/L (70 ~ 90 mg/dL)。主要终点是HbA1c的变化,次要验证终点是体重的变化,从基线到第40周,对所有随机分配的参与者进行评估。0-45周记录不良事件。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT06269107)并已完成。研究结果:在2024年2月15日至8月6日期间筛查的653例患者中,151例不符合筛查标准,17例在开始治疗前退出;243例随机分配到IcoSema组,242例随机分配到甘精U100组。在485名随机分配的参与者中,286名(59%)为男性,199名(41%)为女性,中位年龄为58岁(范围26-82岁)。对于HbA1c,从基线(IcoSema为9.57%,甘精U100为9.50%)到第40周,IcoSema与甘精U100的平均变化更大(- 3.32 vs - 2.44个百分点;估计治疗差异[ETD] - 0.88个百分点[95% CI - 1.12至- 0.63]),证实了IcoSema的优越性(解释:与甘精U100相比,每周一次的IcoSema显示出更好的HbA1c降低和体重变化,临床显著或严重低血糖发生率更低,这表明IcoSema可能是口服降糖药物控制不足的胰岛素初治2型糖尿病患者的有效治疗选择。融资:诺和诺德。
{"title":"Once-weekly IcoSema versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes management (COMBINE 4): an open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, randomised, phase 3b trial.","authors":"Linong Ji, Malik Benamar, Viswanathan Mohan, Laura Pletsch-Borba, Francesca Porcellati, Ni Wang, Hirotaka Watada, Rosangela R Rea","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00136-1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00136-1","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Stepwise treatment intensification is recommended for managing type 2 diabetes, including insulin initiation when non-insulin glucose-lowering medications are insufficient. Guidelines recommend combining a GLP-1 receptor agonist with basal insulin to improve glycaemic efficacy while reducing weight gain and hypoglycaemia risk. COMBINE 4 evaluated the efficacy and safety of IcoSema, a once-weekly combination therapy of basal insulin icodec and semaglutide (a GLP-1-receptor agonist) versus insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100) in people with type 2 diabetes on oral glucose-lowering medications.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;COMBINE 4 was a 40-week, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target, phase 3b trial conducted across 97 sites in nine countries. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes (HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; ≥8·0%) receiving oral glucose-lowering medications were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio without stratification to IcoSema or once-daily glargine U100. The titration target was 3·9-5·0 mmol/L (70-90 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was change in HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; and the secondary confirmatory endpoint was change in bodyweight, both from baseline to week 40, evaluated in all randomly allocated participants. Adverse events were recorded during weeks 0-45. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06269107) and is complete.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;Of 653 individuals screened between Feb 15 and Aug 6, 2024, 151 did not meet screening criteria and 17 withdrew before initiating treatment; 243 were randomised to IcoSema and 242 to glargine U100. Of the 485 randomly allocated participants, 286 (59%) were male and 199 (41%) were female, and median age was 58 years (range 26-82). For HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt;, from baseline (9·57% for IcoSema and 9·50% for glargine U100), mean change to week 40 was greater with IcoSema versus glargine U100 (-3·32 vs -2·44 percentage points; estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0·88 percentage points [95% CI -1·12 to -0·63]), confirming superiority of IcoSema (p&lt;0·001). From baseline to week 40, mean bodyweight decreased with IcoSema and increased with glargine U100 (-0·79 vs 3·81 kg; ETD -4·61 kg [95% CI -5·46 to -3·75]), confirming superiority of IcoSema (p&lt;0·001). Rate of combined clinically significant (blood glucose &lt;3·0 mmol/L [&lt;54 mg/dL], confirmed with a blood glucose meter) or severe hypoglycaemia (severe cognitive impairment requiring external assistance for recovery) was statistically significantly lower with IcoSema versus glargine U100 (0·29 vs 0·59 episodes per person-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 0·56 [95% CI 0·32 to 0·97]; p=0·04). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequently reported adverse events with IcoSema.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation: &lt;/strong&gt;Once-weekly IcoSema demonstrated superior HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; reduction and bodyweight change, with lower rates of clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia, versus glargine U100, suggesting that I","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148761456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Redrawing the lines for the management of obesity in Asia. 重塑亚洲肥胖管理的路线。
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-10 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00155-5
Bernard Khoo
{"title":"Redrawing the lines for the management of obesity in Asia.","authors":"Bernard Khoo","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00155-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00155-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148707762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2·4 mg in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity (STEP 12): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3b trial. 每周一次的semaglutide 2.4 mg在中国超重或肥胖成年人中的疗效和安全性(step12):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、3b期试验。
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-10 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00133-6
Lixin Guo, Xiaolei Bao, Kuo-Chin Huang, Kristoffer Jensen Kolnes, Christian Laugesen, Yibing Lu, Bifen Luo, Guoyue Yuan, Robert F Kushner

Background: Semaglutide 2·4 mg is a GLP-1 receptor agonist that reduces bodyweight, and provides other cardiometabolic benefits, among people with a BMI at least 30 kg/m2 or at least 27 kg/m2 and with weight-related comorbidities. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of semaglutide 2·4 mg in adults from mainland China and Taiwan with overweight or obesity according to locally defined, BMI thresholds.

Methods: This completed randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group, phase 3b trial (STEP 12) was conducted at 19 sites across mainland China and Taiwan. Adults with a BMI of 24-<28 kg/m2 and at least one weight-related comorbidity, or a BMI of 28-<30 kg/m2, with or without type 2 diabetes, were randomly assigned (2:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg or placebo, plus lifestyle intervention, for 44 weeks. Randomisation was performed by the study sponsor using the Randomisation Trial Supplies Management System. Coprimary endpoints were percentage change in bodyweight and the proportion of participants achieving at least 5% bodyweight reduction. Safety was analysed descriptively in all participants who received the trial intervention. Missing data at week 44 were imputed with washout multiple imputation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06041217, and is completed.

Findings: Between Sept 15, 2023, and May 7, 2025, of 254 screened participants, 161 (66·5%) of 242 participants were randomly assigned to semaglutide 2·4 mg and 81 (33·5%) to placebo; 121 (50·0%) participants were female, and 47 (19·4%) participants had type 2 diabetes. Bodyweight reduction was greater with semaglutide versus placebo (-12·1% [SE 0·6] vs -2·2% [0·8]; estimated treatment difference -9·9 percentage points [95% CI -11·8 to -8·0]; p<0·0001), with a greater proportion of participants achieving at least 5% bodyweight reduction (80·5% vs 24·4%; odds ratio [OR] 14·8 [95% CI 7·4 to 29·6]; p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 141 (87·6%) of 161 participants in the semaglutide 2·4 mg group and 61 (75·3%) of 81 participants in the placebo group, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common.

Interpretation: Semaglutide 2·4 mg provided a superior reduction in bodyweight versus placebo in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity. The safety profile was consistent with the known profile of semaglutide.

Funding: Novo Nordisk A/S.

Translation: For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

背景:Semaglutide 2.4 mg是一种GLP-1受体激动剂,对于BMI≥30kg /m2或≥27kg /m2且伴有体重相关合并症的人群,可减轻体重,并提供其他心脏代谢益处。本试验旨在根据当地定义的BMI阈值,评估semaglutide 2.4 mg在中国大陆和台湾超重或肥胖成人中的疗效、耐受性和安全性。方法:这项完成的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心、双臂、平行组、3b期试验(step12)在中国大陆和台湾的19个地点进行。BMI为24-2且至少有一种体重相关合并症,或BMI为28-2,伴有或不伴有2型糖尿病的成年人随机分配(2:1)至每周一次皮下注射塞马鲁肽2.4 mg或安慰剂组,外加生活方式干预,持续44周。随机化由研究发起人使用随机化试验用品管理系统进行。主要终点是体重变化的百分比和体重减轻至少5%的参与者比例。对所有接受试验干预的参与者的安全性进行描述性分析。第44周的缺失数据用冲洗多重输入法进行输入。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT06041217,并已完成。研究结果:在2023年9月15日至2025年5月7日期间,254名筛选的参与者中,242名参与者中有161名(66.5%)被随机分配到semaglutide 2.4 mg组,81名(33.5%)被随机分配到安慰剂组;121名(50.0%)参与者为女性,47名(19.4%)参与者患有2型糖尿病。西马鲁肽与安慰剂相比,体重减轻更大(- 12.1% [SE 0.6] vs - 2.2%[0.8];估计治疗差异- 9.9个百分点[95% CI - 11.8至- 8.0];解释:在超重或肥胖的中国成年人中,西马鲁肽2.4 mg提供了比安慰剂更好的体重减轻。安全性与已知的西马鲁肽的安全性一致。融资:诺和诺德A/S。翻译:摘要的中文翻译见补充资料部分。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 2·4 mg in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity (STEP 12): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3b trial.","authors":"Lixin Guo, Xiaolei Bao, Kuo-Chin Huang, Kristoffer Jensen Kolnes, Christian Laugesen, Yibing Lu, Bifen Luo, Guoyue Yuan, Robert F Kushner","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00133-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00133-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Semaglutide 2·4 mg is a GLP-1 receptor agonist that reduces bodyweight, and provides other cardiometabolic benefits, among people with a BMI at least 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup> or at least 27 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and with weight-related comorbidities. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of semaglutide 2·4 mg in adults from mainland China and Taiwan with overweight or obesity according to locally defined, BMI thresholds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This completed randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, two-armed, parallel-group, phase 3b trial (STEP 12) was conducted at 19 sites across mainland China and Taiwan. Adults with a BMI of 24-<28 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and at least one weight-related comorbidity, or a BMI of 28-<30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, with or without type 2 diabetes, were randomly assigned (2:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg or placebo, plus lifestyle intervention, for 44 weeks. Randomisation was performed by the study sponsor using the Randomisation Trial Supplies Management System. Coprimary endpoints were percentage change in bodyweight and the proportion of participants achieving at least 5% bodyweight reduction. Safety was analysed descriptively in all participants who received the trial intervention. Missing data at week 44 were imputed with washout multiple imputation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06041217, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Sept 15, 2023, and May 7, 2025, of 254 screened participants, 161 (66·5%) of 242 participants were randomly assigned to semaglutide 2·4 mg and 81 (33·5%) to placebo; 121 (50·0%) participants were female, and 47 (19·4%) participants had type 2 diabetes. Bodyweight reduction was greater with semaglutide versus placebo (-12·1% [SE 0·6] vs -2·2% [0·8]; estimated treatment difference -9·9 percentage points [95% CI -11·8 to -8·0]; p<0·0001), with a greater proportion of participants achieving at least 5% bodyweight reduction (80·5% vs 24·4%; odds ratio [OR] 14·8 [95% CI 7·4 to 29·6]; p<0·0001). Adverse events were reported in 141 (87·6%) of 161 participants in the semaglutide 2·4 mg group and 61 (75·3%) of 81 participants in the placebo group, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Semaglutide 2·4 mg provided a superior reduction in bodyweight versus placebo in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity. The safety profile was consistent with the known profile of semaglutide.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Novo Nordisk A/S.</p><p><strong>Translation: </strong>For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148708293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of semaglutide on kidney outcomes in the SELECT, FLOW, and SOUL trials: a prespecified pooled analysis. 在SELECT、FLOW和SOUL试验中,西马鲁肽对肾脏预后的影响:一项预先指定的汇总分析。
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-07 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00134-8
Johannes F E Mann, Sunil V Badve, Florian M M Baeres, Nicolas Belmar, Kirstine Brown-Frandsen, John B Buse, Helen M Colhoun, John E Deanfield, Mads D M Engelmann, G Kees Hovingh, Thomas Idorn, A Michael Lincoff, Ildiko Lingvay, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Darren K McGuire, Richard E Pratley, Søren Rasmussen, Peter Rossing, Naveed Sattar, Katherine R Tuttle, Vlado Perkovic
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide reduces clinically important kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to assess the pooled effects of semaglutide on kidney outcomes in prespecified analyses of participant-level data from the diverse populations of the SELECT, FLOW, and SOUL randomised placebo-controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with CKD (FLOW) or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (SELECT and SOUL) were randomly assigned semaglutide (once-weekly subcutaneous 1·0 mg [FLOW], once-weekly subcutaneous 2·4 mg [SELECT], or once-daily oral 14 mg [SOUL]) or matching placebo, added to standard of care. The primary outcome in this pooled analysis was time to first occurrence of a kidney composite, defined as onset of persistent 50% or greater reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), kidney failure (persistent eGFR <15 mL/min per 1·73 m<sup>2</sup>, or initiation of kidney replacement therapy), kidney-related death, or cardiovascular-related death. Safety was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The pooled participants from the trials (N=30 787) had a mean follow-up of 39·5-47·5 months. Among participants assigned to semaglutide, 973 first events of the primary kidney composite occurred compared with 1134 first events for placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·84 [95% CI 0·77-0·91]). First events of a narrower secondary kidney composite (excluding cardiovascular-related death from the primary outcome) were also reduced with semaglutide versus placebo (347 and 416, respectively; 0·80 [0·69-0·92]). Safety outcomes were overall similar between groups, and in line with other GLP-1 receptor agonist trials. Serious adverse events were numberically lower with semaglutide than with placebo.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Data pooled from three large phase 3 trials suggest that semaglutide reduces the risk of major kidney outcomes in a broad population with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease while having a favourable risk-benefit profile. In people with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease, with and without diabetes, semaglutide (oral or injected) prevents kidney-related and cardiovascular complications and induces adverse events in line with GLP-1 receptor agonist studies, regardless of baseline characteristics within the cardio-kidney-metabolic spectrum. This was a participant-level analysis conducted in a large database of three randomised controlled trials of similar design and examining the same treatment, but there were some differences in participants' baseline characteristics, and in the dose and route of administration of treatment. This pooled analysis adds evidence for the benefit of GLP-1 receptor agonists in general, and semaglutide in particular, in a broad population of people with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease, suggesting that the benefit of semaglutide might not be explained only by its glycaemic effects, weight
背景:GLP-1受体激动剂semaglutide可降低2型糖尿病和慢性肾病(CKD)患者临床上重要的肾脏预后。我们的目的是通过对SELECT、FLOW和SOUL随机安慰剂对照试验的不同人群的参与者水平数据的预先分析,评估西马鲁肽对肾脏结局的综合影响。方法:CKD (FLOW)或动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(SELECT和SOUL)的参与者随机分配西马鲁肽(每周一次皮下1.0 mg [FLOW],每周一次皮下2.4 mg [SELECT],或每天一次口服14 mg [SOUL])或匹配的安慰剂,加入标准护理。本合并分析的主要终点是首次发生肾脏并发症的时间,定义为肾小球滤过率(eGFR)持续下降50%或以上,肾衰竭(持续eGFR 2,或开始肾脏替代治疗),肾脏相关死亡或心血管相关死亡。安全性也进行了评估。结果:来自试验的合并参与者(N= 30787)的平均随访时间为39.5 - 47.5个月。在接受西马鲁肽治疗的受试者中,发生了973例原发性肾脏并发症的首次事件,而安慰剂组发生了1134例首次事件(风险比[HR] 0.84 [95% CI 0.77 - 0.91])。西马鲁肽与安慰剂相比也减少了继发性肾脏并发症的首次事件(主要结局中不包括心血管相关死亡)(分别为347例和416例;0.80例[0.69 - 0.92])。安全性结果在两组之间总体相似,并且与其他GLP-1受体激动剂试验一致。西马鲁肽组的严重不良事件数量低于安慰剂组。解释:来自三个大型iii期试验的汇总数据表明,在广泛的心肾代谢性疾病人群中,西马鲁肽降低了主要肾脏结局的风险,同时具有良好的风险-收益概况。在伴有或不伴有糖尿病的心肾代谢性疾病患者中,与GLP-1受体激动剂研究结果一致,西马鲁肽(口服或注射)可预防肾脏相关和心血管并发症,并诱发不良事件,而不管心肾代谢性谱的基线特征如何。这是在一个大型数据库中进行的一项参与者水平的分析,该数据库包含三个设计相似、检查相同治疗的随机对照试验,但参与者的基线特征、剂量和给药途径存在一些差异。这一综合分析为GLP-1受体激动剂,特别是semaglutide在广泛的心肾代谢疾病人群中的益处提供了证据,表明semaglutide的益处可能不仅仅是通过其降糖作用、体重管理作用或两者兼有来解释。融资:诺和诺德。
{"title":"Effect of semaglutide on kidney outcomes in the SELECT, FLOW, and SOUL trials: a prespecified pooled analysis.","authors":"Johannes F E Mann, Sunil V Badve, Florian M M Baeres, Nicolas Belmar, Kirstine Brown-Frandsen, John B Buse, Helen M Colhoun, John E Deanfield, Mads D M Engelmann, G Kees Hovingh, Thomas Idorn, A Michael Lincoff, Ildiko Lingvay, Kenneth W Mahaffey, Darren K McGuire, Richard E Pratley, Søren Rasmussen, Peter Rossing, Naveed Sattar, Katherine R Tuttle, Vlado Perkovic","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00134-8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00134-8","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;The GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide reduces clinically important kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We aimed to assess the pooled effects of semaglutide on kidney outcomes in prespecified analyses of participant-level data from the diverse populations of the SELECT, FLOW, and SOUL randomised placebo-controlled trials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Participants with CKD (FLOW) or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (SELECT and SOUL) were randomly assigned semaglutide (once-weekly subcutaneous 1·0 mg [FLOW], once-weekly subcutaneous 2·4 mg [SELECT], or once-daily oral 14 mg [SOUL]) or matching placebo, added to standard of care. The primary outcome in this pooled analysis was time to first occurrence of a kidney composite, defined as onset of persistent 50% or greater reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), kidney failure (persistent eGFR &lt;15 mL/min per 1·73 m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;, or initiation of kidney replacement therapy), kidney-related death, or cardiovascular-related death. Safety was also assessed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;The pooled participants from the trials (N=30 787) had a mean follow-up of 39·5-47·5 months. Among participants assigned to semaglutide, 973 first events of the primary kidney composite occurred compared with 1134 first events for placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·84 [95% CI 0·77-0·91]). First events of a narrower secondary kidney composite (excluding cardiovascular-related death from the primary outcome) were also reduced with semaglutide versus placebo (347 and 416, respectively; 0·80 [0·69-0·92]). Safety outcomes were overall similar between groups, and in line with other GLP-1 receptor agonist trials. Serious adverse events were numberically lower with semaglutide than with placebo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Interpretation: &lt;/strong&gt;Data pooled from three large phase 3 trials suggest that semaglutide reduces the risk of major kidney outcomes in a broad population with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease while having a favourable risk-benefit profile. In people with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease, with and without diabetes, semaglutide (oral or injected) prevents kidney-related and cardiovascular complications and induces adverse events in line with GLP-1 receptor agonist studies, regardless of baseline characteristics within the cardio-kidney-metabolic spectrum. This was a participant-level analysis conducted in a large database of three randomised controlled trials of similar design and examining the same treatment, but there were some differences in participants' baseline characteristics, and in the dose and route of administration of treatment. This pooled analysis adds evidence for the benefit of GLP-1 receptor agonists in general, and semaglutide in particular, in a broad population of people with cardio-kidney-metabolic disease, suggesting that the benefit of semaglutide might not be explained only by its glycaemic effects, weight","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148690220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Less can be more: the 2026 Endocrine Society Guideline for precision care in central precocious puberty. 少即是多:《2026年内分泌学会中枢性性早熟精准护理指南》。
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-03 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00193-2
Sasha R Howard
{"title":"Less can be more: the 2026 Endocrine Society Guideline for precision care in central precocious puberty.","authors":"Sasha R Howard","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00193-2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00193-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148671120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A quarter-century of progress: innovations in lipid medicine that transformed cardiovascular prevention. 四分之一世纪的进步:脂质医学的创新改变了心血管预防。
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-08 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00102-6
Lluís Masana, Josep Ribalta, Daiana Ibarretxe

This TimeCapsule reviews the major transformations in lipid metabolism and cardiovascular disease prevention during the first quarter of the 21st century and their impact on clinical practice. From late 20th century paradigms to current state-of-the-art strategies, the field has consolidated statins as foundational therapy while establishing the clinical benefit of non-statin agents and introducing biological therapies into cardiovascular disease prevention. These developments support the paradigm that lowering LDL-cholesterol levels earlier and sustaining this over time translates to greater reductions in cardiovascular risk. More recently, RNA-targeted and DNA-targeted approaches have enabled the modulation of proteins, such as PCSK9, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein C-III, and ANGPTL3. The traditional concept of HDL-cholesterol being considered a good cholesterol has been challenged, whereas the causal relevance of lipoprotein(a) has gained recognition. New metrics-including non-HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglyceride-rich remnants, or remnant cholesterol-are increasingly integrated into residual risk assessment. A growing sex-specific perspective has refined cardiovascular research and care. Despite robust evidence, the proportion of patients meeting their recommended targets remains unacceptably low. Implementation science seeks to address this persistent evidence-practice gap. In parallel, artificial intelligence is reshaping scientific methodologies and is poised to transform the understanding and management of lipid-related cardiometabolic disease.

这篇时间胶囊回顾了21世纪前25年脂质代谢和心血管疾病预防的主要转变及其对临床实践的影响。从20世纪末的范例到目前最先进的策略,该领域已经巩固了他汀类药物作为基础治疗的地位,同时确立了非他汀类药物的临床益处,并将生物疗法引入心血管疾病预防。这些发展支持了早期降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平并长期维持这种水平可以更大程度地降低心血管风险的范式。最近,rna靶向和dna靶向方法已经能够调节蛋白质,如PCSK9、脂蛋白(a)、载脂蛋白C-III和ANGPTL3。高密度脂蛋白胆固醇被认为是一种好胆固醇的传统观念受到了挑战,而脂蛋白(a)的因果关系得到了认可。新的指标——包括非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、载脂蛋白B、富含甘油三酯的残留物或残留胆固醇——越来越多地被纳入残留风险评估。越来越多的性别特异性观点改进了心血管研究和护理。尽管有强有力的证据,但达到推荐目标的患者比例仍然低得令人无法接受。实施科学力求解决这一长期存在的证据与实践之间的差距。与此同时,人工智能正在重塑科学方法,并准备改变对脂质相关心脏代谢疾病的理解和管理。
{"title":"A quarter-century of progress: innovations in lipid medicine that transformed cardiovascular prevention.","authors":"Lluís Masana, Josep Ribalta, Daiana Ibarretxe","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00102-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00102-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This TimeCapsule reviews the major transformations in lipid metabolism and cardiovascular disease prevention during the first quarter of the 21st century and their impact on clinical practice. From late 20<sup>th</sup> century paradigms to current state-of-the-art strategies, the field has consolidated statins as foundational therapy while establishing the clinical benefit of non-statin agents and introducing biological therapies into cardiovascular disease prevention. These developments support the paradigm that lowering LDL-cholesterol levels earlier and sustaining this over time translates to greater reductions in cardiovascular risk. More recently, RNA-targeted and DNA-targeted approaches have enabled the modulation of proteins, such as PCSK9, lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein C-III, and ANGPTL3. The traditional concept of HDL-cholesterol being considered a good cholesterol has been challenged, whereas the causal relevance of lipoprotein(a) has gained recognition. New metrics-including non-HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, triglyceride-rich remnants, or remnant cholesterol-are increasingly integrated into residual risk assessment. A growing sex-specific perspective has refined cardiovascular research and care. Despite robust evidence, the proportion of patients meeting their recommended targets remains unacceptably low. Implementation science seeks to address this persistent evidence-practice gap. In parallel, artificial intelligence is reshaping scientific methodologies and is poised to transform the understanding and management of lipid-related cardiometabolic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":"693-702"},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148206567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Obesity medications versus metabolic bariatric surgery: the debate goes on. 肥胖药物与代谢减肥手术:争论仍在继续。
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-17 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00124-5
Tricia M M Tan
{"title":"Obesity medications versus metabolic bariatric surgery: the debate goes on.","authors":"Tricia M M Tan","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00124-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00124-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":"619-621"},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148273473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Out of touch medical care. 脱离现实的医疗保健。
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-01 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00164-6
The Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology
{"title":"Out of touch medical care.","authors":"The Lancet Diabetes Endocrinology","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00164-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00164-6","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":"617"},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148370428","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
1-year outcomes of semaglutide, tirzepatide, and sleeve gastrectomy in obesity in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. 西马鲁肽、替西帕肽和袖式胃切除术治疗2型糖尿病肥胖患者的1年预后:一项回顾性队列研究
IF 36.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-17 DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00030-6
Daniel B Leslie, Brian T Steffen, Eric Wise, Lyn M Steffen, Kristi Kopacz, Darin Ruanpeng, David R Jacobs, Sayeed Ikramuddin
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes and obesity are prevalent, inter-related conditions for which treatment options have expanded substantially, yet direct real-world comparisons of modern pharmacological and surgical interventions remain scarce. We aimed to compare 1-year weight loss, glycaemic outcomes, and selected safety outcomes associated with semaglutide, tirzepatide, and sleeve gastrectomy among adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes in real-world clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Epic Cosmos, a de-identified electronic health record dataset from 1633 hospitals and 37 900 clinics across 280 health systems in the USA. Adults with a BMI of at least 35 kg/m<sup>2</sup> and HbA<sub>1c</sub> above 6·4% who initiated at least 12 months of therapy with semaglutide or tirzepatide and attaining maintenance doses, or who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was attainment of at least 20% bodyweight loss and HbA<sub>1c</sub> below 5·7% at 1 year after the index date. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted probabilities and relative risks, adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline HbA<sub>1c</sub>, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI 2020), and baseline medication burden for diabetes, lipids, and hypertension. Prespecified safety outcomes included emergency department visits and new prescriptions for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or nausea within 1 year of the index date. The primary composite outcome was analysed among patients with both follow-up weight and HbA<sub>1c</sub> available in the 9-month to 15-month window. Emergency department visits were analysed in the final analysis cohort (ie, patients meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria and with available baseline and 9-month to 15-month weight and HbA<sub>1c</sub> measurements) and medication-based safety outcomes were analysed descriptively using outcome-specific available data denominators without imputation.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 468 712 patients with at least 365 consecutive days of semaglutide or tirzepatide prescriptions and 238 028 patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy were identified in Epic Cosmos. After applying prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria, 45 649 patients met inclusion criteria; after exclusion of 556 patients with missing Charlson Comorbidity Index data, 45 093 were included in the primary outcome analysis: 33 482 (74·3%) treated with semaglutide, 4178 (9·3%) treated with tirzepatide, and 7433 (16·5%) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy. The adjusted probability of attaining the primary composite outcome of at least 20% bodyweight loss and HbA<sub>1c</sub> below 5·7% at 1 year was 3·0% (95% CI 2·8-3·2) for semaglutide, 13·2% (12·2-14·3) for tirzepatide, and 24·0% (22·9-25·1) for sleeve gastrectomy. Emergency department visits within 1 year were more frequent after sleeve gastrec
背景:2型糖尿病和肥胖是普遍存在的相互关联的疾病,其治疗选择已经大大扩大,但现代药物和手术干预的直接现实世界比较仍然很少。我们的目的是在现实世界的临床实践中比较成人肥胖和2型糖尿病患者与西马鲁肽、替西帕肽和袖式胃切除术相关的1年体重减轻、血糖结局和选定的安全性结局。方法:我们使用Epic Cosmos进行了一项回顾性队列研究,Epic Cosmos是来自美国280个卫生系统中1633家医院和37900家诊所的去识别电子健康记录数据集。BMI至少为35 kg/m2, HbA1c高于6.4%且开始使用西马鲁肽或替西帕肽治疗至少12个月并达到维持剂量,或接受袖式胃切除术的成年人符合纳入条件。主要结局是在指标日期后1年达到至少20%的体重减轻和低于5.7%的HbA1c。多变量logistic回归估计了调整概率和相对风险,调整了年龄、性别、种族、基线HbA1c、BMI、Charlson合并症指数、社会脆弱性指数(SVI 2020)以及糖尿病、血脂和高血压的基线药物负担。预先指定的安全结果包括在索引日期后1年内急诊就诊和胃食管反流疾病或恶心的新处方。对9个月至15个月随访体重和HbA1c的患者进行主要综合结局分析。在最终分析队列中分析急诊科就诊情况(即,符合所有纳入和排除标准的患者,具有可用的基线和9个月至15个月的体重和糖化血红蛋白测量值),并使用结果特异性的可用数据分母对基于药物的安全性结果进行描述性分析,而不进行代入。结果:在Epic Cosmos中共发现了468712例连续至少365天服用西马鲁肽或替西帕肽的患者和238 028例接受袖式胃切除术的患者。应用预先设定的纳入和排除标准,45 649例患者符合纳入标准;在排除556例缺少Charlson合并症指数数据的患者后,45093例患者被纳入主要结果分析:33 482例(74.3%)接受西马鲁肽治疗,4178例(9.3%)接受替西帕肽治疗,7433例(16.5%)接受袖式胃切除术。在一年内达到体重减轻至少20%和HbA1c低于5.7%的主要综合结果的调整概率,西马鲁肽为3.0% (95% CI 2.8 - 3.2),替西帕肽为13.2%(12.2 - 14.3),袖式胃切除术为24.0%(22.9 - 25.1)。套筒胃切除术后1年内急诊科就诊频率高于使用西马鲁肽或替西帕肽的患者。胃食管反流疾病和恶心的新处方出现在所有治疗组,但频率不同,袖胃切除术后观察到的绝对发生率更高。解释:在指标日期后1年,套筒胃切除术达到体重和血糖综合目标的可能性最高,其次是替西帕肽和西马鲁肽。解释应考虑基线差异,包括袖胃切除术组较高的BMI、较年轻的年龄和较低的基线HbA1c,以及残留的混杂因素和有限的安全性评估范围。资金:没有。
{"title":"1-year outcomes of semaglutide, tirzepatide, and sleeve gastrectomy in obesity in type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Daniel B Leslie, Brian T Steffen, Eric Wise, Lyn M Steffen, Kristi Kopacz, Darin Ruanpeng, David R Jacobs, Sayeed Ikramuddin","doi":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00030-6","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S2213-8587(26)00030-6","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Type 2 diabetes and obesity are prevalent, inter-related conditions for which treatment options have expanded substantially, yet direct real-world comparisons of modern pharmacological and surgical interventions remain scarce. We aimed to compare 1-year weight loss, glycaemic outcomes, and selected safety outcomes associated with semaglutide, tirzepatide, and sleeve gastrectomy among adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes in real-world clinical practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Epic Cosmos, a de-identified electronic health record dataset from 1633 hospitals and 37 900 clinics across 280 health systems in the USA. Adults with a BMI of at least 35 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; and HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; above 6·4% who initiated at least 12 months of therapy with semaglutide or tirzepatide and attaining maintenance doses, or who underwent sleeve gastrectomy, were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was attainment of at least 20% bodyweight loss and HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; below 5·7% at 1 year after the index date. Multivariable logistic regression estimated adjusted probabilities and relative risks, adjusting for age, sex, race, baseline HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt;, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI 2020), and baseline medication burden for diabetes, lipids, and hypertension. Prespecified safety outcomes included emergency department visits and new prescriptions for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or nausea within 1 year of the index date. The primary composite outcome was analysed among patients with both follow-up weight and HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; available in the 9-month to 15-month window. Emergency department visits were analysed in the final analysis cohort (ie, patients meeting all inclusion and exclusion criteria and with available baseline and 9-month to 15-month weight and HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; measurements) and medication-based safety outcomes were analysed descriptively using outcome-specific available data denominators without imputation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Findings: &lt;/strong&gt;A total of 468 712 patients with at least 365 consecutive days of semaglutide or tirzepatide prescriptions and 238 028 patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy were identified in Epic Cosmos. After applying prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria, 45 649 patients met inclusion criteria; after exclusion of 556 patients with missing Charlson Comorbidity Index data, 45 093 were included in the primary outcome analysis: 33 482 (74·3%) treated with semaglutide, 4178 (9·3%) treated with tirzepatide, and 7433 (16·5%) who underwent sleeve gastrectomy. The adjusted probability of attaining the primary composite outcome of at least 20% bodyweight loss and HbA&lt;sub&gt;1c&lt;/sub&gt; below 5·7% at 1 year was 3·0% (95% CI 2·8-3·2) for semaglutide, 13·2% (12·2-14·3) for tirzepatide, and 24·0% (22·9-25·1) for sleeve gastrectomy. Emergency department visits within 1 year were more frequent after sleeve gastrec","PeriodicalId":48790,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":"638-648"},"PeriodicalIF":36.3,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148273426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1