Judith Dineley, Noah Stanton, Aadam Aziz, Matteo Catanzano, Hissah Al Abdulsalam, Huajie Jin, Nicholas Cummins, Salim Jakhra, Solomon Wong, Johnny Downs
Documentation comprises a large proportion of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) clinicians/practitioners' work burden and is often completed outside contracted working hours, either requiring overtime pay and/or contributing to burnout. Ambient voice technology (AVT) combines AI-driven automated transcription and reporting and is a promising tool to mitigate these challenges. Multiple commercial products have been deployed in clinical settings internationally, including mental health services. Guidance on safe and effective use is yet to be established, and specific regulation of AI-based health technology is still in its infancy or does not exist in many countries. Further, to date, evidence on safety, acceptability, system-level efficiency gains, performance and economic value is sparse. As a cross-disciplinary group with direct implementation experience, we provide a broad overview of the clinical, technical, ethical, regulatory and economic aspects of introducing AVT to CAMHS and neurodevelopmental clinical settings to guide decision-makers and highlight evidence gaps.
{"title":"Technology Matters: Ambient voice technology in mental health and neurodevelopmental settings - considerations for responsible implementation and evidence gaps.","authors":"Judith Dineley, Noah Stanton, Aadam Aziz, Matteo Catanzano, Hissah Al Abdulsalam, Huajie Jin, Nicholas Cummins, Salim Jakhra, Solomon Wong, Johnny Downs","doi":"10.1111/camh.70092","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70092","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Documentation comprises a large proportion of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS) clinicians/practitioners' work burden and is often completed outside contracted working hours, either requiring overtime pay and/or contributing to burnout. Ambient voice technology (AVT) combines AI-driven automated transcription and reporting and is a promising tool to mitigate these challenges. Multiple commercial products have been deployed in clinical settings internationally, including mental health services. Guidance on safe and effective use is yet to be established, and specific regulation of AI-based health technology is still in its infancy or does not exist in many countries. Further, to date, evidence on safety, acceptability, system-level efficiency gains, performance and economic value is sparse. As a cross-disciplinary group with direct implementation experience, we provide a broad overview of the clinical, technical, ethical, regulatory and economic aspects of introducing AVT to CAMHS and neurodevelopmental clinical settings to guide decision-makers and highlight evidence gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147516030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding the mental health impact of climate change is of paramount importance to promoting youth resilience and pro-environmental engagement. Here, we reflect on the study of Park et al. (Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2026) on the prevalence and mental health correlates of climate worry in young adolescents. We propose that terminological clarity and abstinence from evaluative judgments on the adaptiveness of climate worry are necessary to unravel its role and function in young people's mental health and lives. We also provide suggestions for future research and practice that aim to deepen on three key implications of the study: (a) that climate worry has multiple unique links to a host of mental health problems in young adolescents; (b) that gender differences in climate worry are present already from a young age; and (c) that adults should promote both resilience and pro-environmental engagement in youth, in a developmentally appropriate manner.
{"title":"Commentary: Should we worry about climate worry? Understanding and promoting youth resilience and pro-environmental engagement: a commentary on Park et al. (2026).","authors":"Stathis Grapsas, Atheer Massarwe","doi":"10.1111/camh.70091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the mental health impact of climate change is of paramount importance to promoting youth resilience and pro-environmental engagement. Here, we reflect on the study of Park et al. (Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 2026) on the prevalence and mental health correlates of climate worry in young adolescents. We propose that terminological clarity and abstinence from evaluative judgments on the adaptiveness of climate worry are necessary to unravel its role and function in young people's mental health and lives. We also provide suggestions for future research and practice that aim to deepen on three key implications of the study: (a) that climate worry has multiple unique links to a host of mental health problems in young adolescents; (b) that gender differences in climate worry are present already from a young age; and (c) that adults should promote both resilience and pro-environmental engagement in youth, in a developmentally appropriate manner.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147515996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Emma Sullivan, Rob Dallison, Pete Montgomery, Lisa Henderson
Background: Smartphones/social media have been hailed as offering educational benefits, but widespread concerns highlight multiple negative effects, including for learning and well-being. Some countries enforce school phone bans, whereas others (e.g., England) have guidance promoting 'phone-free environments' but no legal mandate at present. There is limited evidence on the benefits of such policies, including whether they promote safeguarding.
Methods: We used freedom of information (FOI) requests to investigate the relationship between mobile phone policies and digital safeguarding incidents in 114 schools in England (>90,000 pupils). We examined the prevalence and content of policies during the 2023/2024 academic year and digital incident reporting.
Results: Sixty of 114 (52.63%) schools had a mobile phone policy. Policy type and content varied significantly, with inconsistent use of 'ban' terminology. Digital safeguarding incidents made up only 4.9% (4183/85,540) of all incidents but varied substantially (>10% in 36/114 schools; >25% in 9), suggesting inconsistent reporting. Schools with policies, regardless of restrictiveness, reported more digital incidents. Schools with restrictive policies were more likely to refer incidents and reported more school-based incidents, although most still occurred outside school.
Conclusion: Safeguarding incidents involving smartphones or social media are occurring in schools throughout England. Schools with mobile phone policies were more likely to report digital safeguarding incidents, suggesting an association between policy presence and reporting. Vast variation in policy content and inconsistent 'ban' rhetoric undermine the potential for effective safeguarding. These findings underscore the need for standardised definitions of digital risks and consistent policy approaches.
背景:智能手机/社交媒体被认为能带来教育上的好处,但广泛的担忧凸显了其多重负面影响,包括对学习和幸福感的影响。一些国家强制禁止在学校使用手机,而另一些国家(如英国)有促进“无手机环境”的指导方针,但目前没有法律规定。关于这些政策的好处,包括它们是否促进了保护的证据有限。方法:采用信息自由法(freedom of information, FOI)对英国114所学校(约90000名学生)的手机政策与数字安全事件之间的关系进行调查。我们研究了2023/2024学年和数字事件报告期间政策的流行程度和内容。结果:114所学校中有60所(52.63%)有手机政策。政策类型和内容差异很大,“禁令”术语的使用不一致。数字安全事件仅占所有事件的4.9%(4183/85,540),但差异很大(36/114所学校的数字安全事件占10%,9所学校的数字安全事件占25%),这表明报告不一致。有相关政策的学校,不管是否有限制,都报告了更多的数字事件。实行限制性政策的学校更有可能将事件转述给他人,并报告了更多的校内事件,尽管大多数事件仍然发生在校外。结论:涉及智能手机或社交媒体的安全事件正在英国各地的学校发生。有手机政策的学校更有可能报告数字安全事件,这表明政策存在与报告之间存在关联。政策内容的巨大差异和不一致的“禁止”言论破坏了有效保护的潜力。这些发现强调了对数字风险进行标准化定义和采取一致的政策方法的必要性。
{"title":"Digital safeguarding incidents in schools with and without smartphone policies: a cross-sectional study in England.","authors":"Emma Sullivan, Rob Dallison, Pete Montgomery, Lisa Henderson","doi":"10.1111/camh.70079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.70079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smartphones/social media have been hailed as offering educational benefits, but widespread concerns highlight multiple negative effects, including for learning and well-being. Some countries enforce school phone bans, whereas others (e.g., England) have guidance promoting 'phone-free environments' but no legal mandate at present. There is limited evidence on the benefits of such policies, including whether they promote safeguarding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used freedom of information (FOI) requests to investigate the relationship between mobile phone policies and digital safeguarding incidents in 114 schools in England (>90,000 pupils). We examined the prevalence and content of policies during the 2023/2024 academic year and digital incident reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty of 114 (52.63%) schools had a mobile phone policy. Policy type and content varied significantly, with inconsistent use of 'ban' terminology. Digital safeguarding incidents made up only 4.9% (4183/85,540) of all incidents but varied substantially (>10% in 36/114 schools; >25% in 9), suggesting inconsistent reporting. Schools with policies, regardless of restrictiveness, reported more digital incidents. Schools with restrictive policies were more likely to refer incidents and reported more school-based incidents, although most still occurred outside school.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Safeguarding incidents involving smartphones or social media are occurring in schools throughout England. Schools with mobile phone policies were more likely to report digital safeguarding incidents, suggesting an association between policy presence and reporting. Vast variation in policy content and inconsistent 'ban' rhetoric undermine the potential for effective safeguarding. These findings underscore the need for standardised definitions of digital risks and consistent policy approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":49291,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147437071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}