Talha Munir,Sean Girvan,David A Cairns,Adrian Bloor,David Allsup,Abraham M Varghese,Satyen Gohil,Shankara Paneesha,Andrew Pettitt,Toby Eyre,Christopher P Fox,Francesco Forconi,Constantine Balotis,Nicholas Pemberton,Oonagh Sheehy,John Gribben,Nagah Elmusharaf,Simona Gatto,Gavin Preston,Anna Schuh,Renata Walewska,Lelia Duley,Nichola Webster,Surita Dalal,Andrew Rawstron,Dena Howard,Anna Hockaday,Sharon Jackson,Natasha Greatorex,Sue Bell,David Stones,Julia M Brown,Piers E M Patten,Peter Hillmen,
BACKGROUNDAn interim analysis of progression-free survival in this trial showed that ibrutinib-venetoclax was superior to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Whether ibrutinib-venetoclax is more effective than ibrutinib alone is unclear.METHODSIn this phase 3, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with CLL to receive ibrutinib-venetoclax, ibrutinib alone, or FCR. The primary end points were undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow within 2 years in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group and progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the FCR group. A powered secondary end point was progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group. Other secondary end points included overall survival.RESULTSA total of 172 of the 260 participants (66.2%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group had undetectable MRD in bone marrow within 2 years, as compared with none of the 263 participants in the ibrutinib-alone group (P<0.001) and 127 of the 263 participants (48.3%) in the FCR group. With a median follow-up of 62.2 months, disease progression or death occurred in 18 participants (6.9%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, as compared with 59 (22.4%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.49; P<0.001) and 112 (42.6%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.21; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 93.9% with ibrutinib-venetoclax, 79.0% with ibrutinib alone, and 58.1% with FCR. Death occurred in 11 participants (4.2%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, as compared with 26 (9.9%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83) and 39 (14.8%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50). Sudden death occurred in 3, 8, and 4 participants in the ibrutinib-venetoclax, ibrutinib-alone, and FCR groups, respectively.CONCLUSIONSWith extended follow-up and increased enrollment, our trial showed that undetectable MRD and extended progression-free survival were more common with ibrutinib-venetoclax than with ibrutinib alone or FCR. The results for overall survival were also consistent with a benefit of ibrutinib-venetoclax. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; FLAIR ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN01844152; EudraCT number, 2013-001944-76.).
{"title":"Measurable Residual Disease-Guided Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.","authors":"Talha Munir,Sean Girvan,David A Cairns,Adrian Bloor,David Allsup,Abraham M Varghese,Satyen Gohil,Shankara Paneesha,Andrew Pettitt,Toby Eyre,Christopher P Fox,Francesco Forconi,Constantine Balotis,Nicholas Pemberton,Oonagh Sheehy,John Gribben,Nagah Elmusharaf,Simona Gatto,Gavin Preston,Anna Schuh,Renata Walewska,Lelia Duley,Nichola Webster,Surita Dalal,Andrew Rawstron,Dena Howard,Anna Hockaday,Sharon Jackson,Natasha Greatorex,Sue Bell,David Stones,Julia M Brown,Piers E M Patten,Peter Hillmen,","doi":"10.1056/nejmoa2504341","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2504341","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDAn interim analysis of progression-free survival in this trial showed that ibrutinib-venetoclax was superior to fludarabine-cyclophosphamide-rituximab (FCR) among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Whether ibrutinib-venetoclax is more effective than ibrutinib alone is unclear.METHODSIn this phase 3, multicenter, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients with CLL to receive ibrutinib-venetoclax, ibrutinib alone, or FCR. The primary end points were undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow within 2 years in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group and progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the FCR group. A powered secondary end point was progression-free survival in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group as compared with the ibrutinib-alone group. Other secondary end points included overall survival.RESULTSA total of 172 of the 260 participants (66.2%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group had undetectable MRD in bone marrow within 2 years, as compared with none of the 263 participants in the ibrutinib-alone group (P<0.001) and 127 of the 263 participants (48.3%) in the FCR group. With a median follow-up of 62.2 months, disease progression or death occurred in 18 participants (6.9%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, as compared with 59 (22.4%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.49; P<0.001) and 112 (42.6%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.21; P<0.001). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 93.9% with ibrutinib-venetoclax, 79.0% with ibrutinib alone, and 58.1% with FCR. Death occurred in 11 participants (4.2%) in the ibrutinib-venetoclax group, as compared with 26 (9.9%) in the ibrutinib-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.83) and 39 (14.8%) in the FCR group (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.50). Sudden death occurred in 3, 8, and 4 participants in the ibrutinib-venetoclax, ibrutinib-alone, and FCR groups, respectively.CONCLUSIONSWith extended follow-up and increased enrollment, our trial showed that undetectable MRD and extended progression-free survival were more common with ibrutinib-venetoclax than with ibrutinib alone or FCR. The results for overall survival were also consistent with a benefit of ibrutinib-venetoclax. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; FLAIR ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN01844152; EudraCT number, 2013-001944-76.).","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"269 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":158.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144295748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Medical AI and Clinician Surveillance - The Risk of Becoming Quantified Workers.","authors":"I Glenn Cohen,Ifeoma Ajunwa,Ravi B Parikh","doi":"10.1056/nejmp2502448","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp2502448","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"228 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":158.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144295749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Deborah E Powell,L Maximilian Buja,Richard Conran,Avrum Gotlieb,Vinay Kumar
{"title":"Pathobiology - Can We Do Without It?","authors":"Deborah E Powell,L Maximilian Buja,Richard Conran,Avrum Gotlieb,Vinay Kumar","doi":"10.1056/nejmp2414384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp2414384","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":158.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144295753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Tongue Atrophy and Fasciculations in Advanced Motor Neuron Disease.","authors":"Harikrishnan Premdeep,Manish Bhartiya","doi":"10.1056/nejmicm2416155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmicm2416155","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":158.5,"publicationDate":"2025-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144295751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
David J Curtis, Sushrut S Patil, John Reynolds, Duncan Purtill, Clinton Lewis, David S Ritchie, David J Gottlieb, David T Yeung, Eric Wong, Siok-Keen Tey, Travis Perera, John Moore, Rachel M Koldej, Richard De Abreu Lourenco, John Stubbs, C Orla Morrissey, Nadia Munsef, Andrea Arenas, Geoffrey R Hill
Background: Allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (SCT) from a matched related donor after myeloablative conditioning is the preferred curative treatment for patients with high-risk blood cancers. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and an antimetabolite remains standard care for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in these patients. Data from two randomized trials have suggested that post-transplantation cyclophosphamide can reduce the risk of GVHD after SCT from a matched donor when it is added to or replaces the antimetabolite. However, the effects of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide specifically after SCT from a matched related donor remain uncertain, and effects in the context of myeloablative conditioning are unclear.
Methods: We randomly assigned adults who were undergoing SCT from a matched related donor after myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning to receive either post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-cyclosporin (experimental prophylaxis) or cyclosporin-methotrexate (standard prophylaxis). The primary end point was GVHD-free, relapse-free survival.
Results: Among 134 patients who underwent randomization, 66 were assigned to receive experimental prophylaxis and 68 to receive standard prophylaxis. GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was significantly longer with experimental prophylaxis (median, 26.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1 to not reached) than with standard prophylaxis (median, 6.4 months; 95% CI, 5.6 to 8.3; P<0.001 by a log-rank test). GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 3 years was 49% (95% CI, 36 to 61) with experimental prophylaxis and 14% (95% CI, 6 to 25) with standard prophylaxis (hazard ratio for GVHD, relapse, or death, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66). The cumulative incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD at 3 months was 3% (95% CI, 1 to 10) in the experimental-prophylaxis group and 10% (95% CI, 4 to 19) in the standard-prophylaxis group. At 2 years, overall survival was 83% and 71%, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.19). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups in the first 100 days after SCT.
Conclusions: The combination of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and a calcineurin inhibitor led to longer GVHD-free, relapse-free survival than standard prophylaxis after transplantation from a matched related donor with either reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning in patients with blood cancers. (Funded by the Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund and others; ALLG BM12 CAST Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618000505202.).
{"title":"Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Cyclophosphamide and Cyclosporin.","authors":"David J Curtis, Sushrut S Patil, John Reynolds, Duncan Purtill, Clinton Lewis, David S Ritchie, David J Gottlieb, David T Yeung, Eric Wong, Siok-Keen Tey, Travis Perera, John Moore, Rachel M Koldej, Richard De Abreu Lourenco, John Stubbs, C Orla Morrissey, Nadia Munsef, Andrea Arenas, Geoffrey R Hill","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2503189","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2503189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allogeneic peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation (SCT) from a matched related donor after myeloablative conditioning is the preferred curative treatment for patients with high-risk blood cancers. The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor and an antimetabolite remains standard care for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in these patients. Data from two randomized trials have suggested that post-transplantation cyclophosphamide can reduce the risk of GVHD after SCT from a matched donor when it is added to or replaces the antimetabolite. However, the effects of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide specifically after SCT from a matched related donor remain uncertain, and effects in the context of myeloablative conditioning are unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly assigned adults who were undergoing SCT from a matched related donor after myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning to receive either post-transplantation cyclophosphamide-cyclosporin (experimental prophylaxis) or cyclosporin-methotrexate (standard prophylaxis). The primary end point was GVHD-free, relapse-free survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 134 patients who underwent randomization, 66 were assigned to receive experimental prophylaxis and 68 to receive standard prophylaxis. GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was significantly longer with experimental prophylaxis (median, 26.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1 to not reached) than with standard prophylaxis (median, 6.4 months; 95% CI, 5.6 to 8.3; P<0.001 by a log-rank test). GVHD-free, relapse-free survival at 3 years was 49% (95% CI, 36 to 61) with experimental prophylaxis and 14% (95% CI, 6 to 25) with standard prophylaxis (hazard ratio for GVHD, relapse, or death, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66). The cumulative incidence of grade III to IV acute GVHD at 3 months was 3% (95% CI, 1 to 10) in the experimental-prophylaxis group and 10% (95% CI, 4 to 19) in the standard-prophylaxis group. At 2 years, overall survival was 83% and 71%, respectively (hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.19). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups in the first 100 days after SCT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and a calcineurin inhibitor led to longer GVHD-free, relapse-free survival than standard prophylaxis after transplantation from a matched related donor with either reduced-intensity or myeloablative conditioning in patients with blood cancers. (Funded by the Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund and others; ALLG BM12 CAST Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12618000505202.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144289760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kathryn Maitland, San Maurice Ouattara, Hadiza Sainna, Abdullahi Chara, Oluwakemi F Ogundipe, Temmy Sunyoto, M Hamaluba, Peter Olupot-Olupot, Florence Alaroker, Roisin Connon, Amadou Saidou Maguina, William Okiror, Denis Amorut, Eric Mwajombo, Emmanuel Oguda, Christabel Mogaka, Céline Langendorf, Juan Emmanuel Dewez, Iza Ciglenecki, Diana M Gibb, Matthew E Coldiron, Roberta Petrucci, Elizabeth C George
Background: International recommendations advise against the use of intravenous rehydration therapy in children with severe acute malnutrition because of the concern about fluid overload, but evidence to support this concern is lacking. Given the high mortality associated with the current recommendations, the adoption of intravenous rehydration strategies might improve outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a factorial, open-label superiority trial in four countries in Africa. Children 6 months to 12 years of age with severe acute malnutrition with gastroenteritis and dehydration underwent randomization in a 2:1:1 ratio to one of three rehydration strategies: oral rehydration, plus intravenous boluses for shock; a rapid intravenous strategy that consisted of lactated Ringer's solution (100 ml per kilogram of body weight) administered over a period of 3 to 6 hours, with boluses for shock; or a slow intravenous strategy that consisted of the same solution administered over a period of 8 hours, with no boluses. The primary end point was death at 96 hours.
Results: A total of 272 children underwent randomization; 138 were assigned to the oral strategy, 67 to the rapid intravenous strategy, and 67 to the slow intravenous strategy. Participants were followed for 28 days. A nasogastric tube was used for oral rehydration in 126 of 135 participants (93%) in the oral group and in 82 of 126 (65%) in the intravenous groups. Intravenous boluses were administered at admission in 12 participants (9%) in the oral group, 7 (10%) in the rapid intravenous group, and none in the slow intravenous group. At 96 hours, 11 participants (8%) in the oral group and 9 (7%) in the intravenous groups (5 in the rapid group and 4 in the slow group) had died (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 2.52; P = 0.69). At 28 days, 17 participants (12%) in the oral group and 14 (10%) in the intravenous groups had died (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.78). Serious adverse events occurred in 32 participants (23%) in the oral group, 14 (21%) in the rapid intravenous group, and 10 (15%) in the slow intravenous group. No evidence of pulmonary edema, heart failure, or fluid overload was noted.
Conclusions: Among children with severe acute malnutrition and gastroenteritis, no evidence of a difference in mortality at 96 hours was noted between oral and intravenous rehydration strategies. (Funded by the Joint Global Health Trials scheme and others; GASTROSAM Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN76149273.).
{"title":"Intravenous Rehydration for Severe Acute Malnutrition with Gastroenteritis.","authors":"Kathryn Maitland, San Maurice Ouattara, Hadiza Sainna, Abdullahi Chara, Oluwakemi F Ogundipe, Temmy Sunyoto, M Hamaluba, Peter Olupot-Olupot, Florence Alaroker, Roisin Connon, Amadou Saidou Maguina, William Okiror, Denis Amorut, Eric Mwajombo, Emmanuel Oguda, Christabel Mogaka, Céline Langendorf, Juan Emmanuel Dewez, Iza Ciglenecki, Diana M Gibb, Matthew E Coldiron, Roberta Petrucci, Elizabeth C George","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2505752","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2505752","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International recommendations advise against the use of intravenous rehydration therapy in children with severe acute malnutrition because of the concern about fluid overload, but evidence to support this concern is lacking. Given the high mortality associated with the current recommendations, the adoption of intravenous rehydration strategies might improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a factorial, open-label superiority trial in four countries in Africa. Children 6 months to 12 years of age with severe acute malnutrition with gastroenteritis and dehydration underwent randomization in a 2:1:1 ratio to one of three rehydration strategies: oral rehydration, plus intravenous boluses for shock; a rapid intravenous strategy that consisted of lactated Ringer's solution (100 ml per kilogram of body weight) administered over a period of 3 to 6 hours, with boluses for shock; or a slow intravenous strategy that consisted of the same solution administered over a period of 8 hours, with no boluses. The primary end point was death at 96 hours.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 272 children underwent randomization; 138 were assigned to the oral strategy, 67 to the rapid intravenous strategy, and 67 to the slow intravenous strategy. Participants were followed for 28 days. A nasogastric tube was used for oral rehydration in 126 of 135 participants (93%) in the oral group and in 82 of 126 (65%) in the intravenous groups. Intravenous boluses were administered at admission in 12 participants (9%) in the oral group, 7 (10%) in the rapid intravenous group, and none in the slow intravenous group. At 96 hours, 11 participants (8%) in the oral group and 9 (7%) in the intravenous groups (5 in the rapid group and 4 in the slow group) had died (risk ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 2.52; P = 0.69). At 28 days, 17 participants (12%) in the oral group and 14 (10%) in the intravenous groups had died (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.78). Serious adverse events occurred in 32 participants (23%) in the oral group, 14 (21%) in the rapid intravenous group, and 10 (15%) in the slow intravenous group. No evidence of pulmonary edema, heart failure, or fluid overload was noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among children with severe acute malnutrition and gastroenteritis, no evidence of a difference in mortality at 96 hours was noted between oral and intravenous rehydration strategies. (Funded by the Joint Global Health Trials scheme and others; GASTROSAM Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN76149273.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144289761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Karen J Bosma, Karen E A Burns, Claudio M Martin, Yoanna Skrobik, Jordi Mancebo Cortés, Sorcha Mulligan, Myriam Lafreniere-Roula, Kevin E Thorpe, Juan Carlos Suárez Montero, Indalecio Morán Chorro, Núria Rodríguez-Farré, Ron Butler, Tracey Bentall, Gaëtan Beduneau, Pauline Enguerrand, Marlene Santos, Thomas Piraino, Savino Spadaro, Federica Montanaro, John Basmaji, Eileen Campbell, Alain Mercat, François M Beloncle, Guillaume Carteaux, Tommaso Maraffi, Emmanuel Charbonney, Marie Lecronier, Martin Dres, Yaseen M Arabi, Andre Carlos Kb Amaral, Nicole Marinoff, Neill K J Adhikari, Anna Geagea, Phil Shin, Katerina Vaporidi, Eumorfia Kondili, Jason Shahin, Josie Campisi, Pablo O Rodriguez, Mariano Setten, Ewan C Goligher, Niall D Ferguson, Vito Fanelli, Gabriela Ferreyra, Francois Lellouche, Stephanie Sibley, Laurent Brochard
Background: In critically ill patients, acceleration of liberation from mechanical ventilation is important in order to reduce the risk of complications and to improve long-term outcomes. Whether the use of proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV+) results in a shorter time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation than pressure-support ventilation (PSV) is unclear.
Methods: In this international clinical trial, we randomly assigned adult patients who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours and were able to undergo partial ventilatory support with PSV but were not yet ready for liberation from ventilation to undergo PAV+ (which targeted normal work of breathing) or PSV (which targeted a normal respiratory rate and tidal volume). The primary outcome was the time from randomization to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation.
Results: Across 23 centers in seven countries, 722 patients were enrolled, and 573 underwent randomization and were included in the analysis. The median time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation was 7.3 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 to 9.7) in the PAV+ group and 6.8 days (95% CI, 5.4 to 8.8) in the PSV group (P = 0.58). The median number of ventilator-free days, the incidence of reintubation and tracheostomy, and the incidence of death by day 90 (29.6% in the PAV+ group and 26.6% in the PSV group), all of which were secondary outcomes, were similar in the two groups. With respect to sedative drugs, the mean (±SD) difference in the midazolam-equivalent dose at day 28 relative to the baseline dose was -1.51±3.28 mg per kilogram of body weight in the PAV+ group and 0.04±0.97 mg per kilogram in the PSV group. Serious adverse events occurred in 31 patients (10.8%) in the PAV+ group and in 28 patients (9.8%) in the PSV group (P = 0.79).
Conclusions: The time to liberation from mechanical ventilation did not differ significantly between the group that underwent PAV+ and the group that underwent PSV. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; PROMIZING ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02447692.).
{"title":"Proportional-Assist Ventilation for Minimizing the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation.","authors":"Karen J Bosma, Karen E A Burns, Claudio M Martin, Yoanna Skrobik, Jordi Mancebo Cortés, Sorcha Mulligan, Myriam Lafreniere-Roula, Kevin E Thorpe, Juan Carlos Suárez Montero, Indalecio Morán Chorro, Núria Rodríguez-Farré, Ron Butler, Tracey Bentall, Gaëtan Beduneau, Pauline Enguerrand, Marlene Santos, Thomas Piraino, Savino Spadaro, Federica Montanaro, John Basmaji, Eileen Campbell, Alain Mercat, François M Beloncle, Guillaume Carteaux, Tommaso Maraffi, Emmanuel Charbonney, Marie Lecronier, Martin Dres, Yaseen M Arabi, Andre Carlos Kb Amaral, Nicole Marinoff, Neill K J Adhikari, Anna Geagea, Phil Shin, Katerina Vaporidi, Eumorfia Kondili, Jason Shahin, Josie Campisi, Pablo O Rodriguez, Mariano Setten, Ewan C Goligher, Niall D Ferguson, Vito Fanelli, Gabriela Ferreyra, Francois Lellouche, Stephanie Sibley, Laurent Brochard","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2505708","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2505708","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In critically ill patients, acceleration of liberation from mechanical ventilation is important in order to reduce the risk of complications and to improve long-term outcomes. Whether the use of proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV+) results in a shorter time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation than pressure-support ventilation (PSV) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this international clinical trial, we randomly assigned adult patients who had been receiving mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours and were able to undergo partial ventilatory support with PSV but were not yet ready for liberation from ventilation to undergo PAV+ (which targeted normal work of breathing) or PSV (which targeted a normal respiratory rate and tidal volume). The primary outcome was the time from randomization to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 23 centers in seven countries, 722 patients were enrolled, and 573 underwent randomization and were included in the analysis. The median time to successful liberation from mechanical ventilation was 7.3 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.2 to 9.7) in the PAV+ group and 6.8 days (95% CI, 5.4 to 8.8) in the PSV group (P = 0.58). The median number of ventilator-free days, the incidence of reintubation and tracheostomy, and the incidence of death by day 90 (29.6% in the PAV+ group and 26.6% in the PSV group), all of which were secondary outcomes, were similar in the two groups. With respect to sedative drugs, the mean (±SD) difference in the midazolam-equivalent dose at day 28 relative to the baseline dose was -1.51±3.28 mg per kilogram of body weight in the PAV+ group and 0.04±0.97 mg per kilogram in the PSV group. Serious adverse events occurred in 31 patients (10.8%) in the PAV+ group and in 28 patients (9.8%) in the PSV group (P = 0.79).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The time to liberation from mechanical ventilation did not differ significantly between the group that underwent PAV+ and the group that underwent PSV. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; PROMIZING ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02447692.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144289762","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fabrizio Monaco, Chong Lei, Matteo Aldo Bonizzoni, Sergey Efremov, Federica Morselli, Fabio Guarracino, Giuseppe Giardina, Cristina Arangino, Domenico Pontillo, Michelangelo Vitiello, Alessandro Belletti, Valentina Ajello, Margherita Licheri, Caetano Nigro Neto, Gaia Barucco, Nazar A Bukamal, Carolina Faustini, Lorenzo Filippo Mantovani, Alessandro Oriani, Cristina Santonocito, Marta Mucchetti, Francesco Federici, Chiara Gerli, Sabrina Porta, Anna Mara Scandroglio, Hui Zhang, Marina Pieri, Roman Osinsky, Stefano Lazzari, Elizaveta Leonova, Maria Grazia Calabrò, Daniele Amitrano, Stefano Turi, Paolo Prati, Stefano Fresilli, Filippo D'Amico, Jacopo D'Andria Ursoleo, Rosa Labanca, Marilena Marmiere, Alessandro Pruna, Tommaso Scquizzato, Kaan Kırali, Giacomo Monti, Maria José Carvalho Carmona, Kenichi Tanaka, Valery Likhvantsev, Lian Kah Ti, Tiziana Bove, Gianluca Paternoster, Karen Singh, Mustafa Emre Gürcü, Vladimir Lomivorotov, Giovanni Landoni, Rinaldo Bellomo, Alberto Zangrillo
Background: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery often receive red-cell transfusions, along with the associated risks and costs. Early intraoperative normovolemic hemodilution (i.e., acute normovolemic hemodilution [ANH]) is a blood-conservation technique that entails autologous blood collection before initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass and reinfusion of the collected blood after bypass weaning. More data are needed on whether ANH reduces the number of patients receiving allogeneic red-cell transfusion.
Methods: In a multinational, single-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults from 32 centers and 11 countries who were undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass to receive ANH (withdrawal of ≥650 ml of whole blood with crystalloids replacement if needed) or usual care. The primary outcome was the transfusion of at least one unit of allogeneic red cells during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were death from any cause within 30 days after surgery or during the hospitalization for surgery, bleeding complications, ischemic complications, and acute kidney injury.
Results: A total of 2010 patients underwent randomization; 1010 were assigned to ANH and 1000 to usual care. Among patients with available data, 274 of 1005 (27.3%) in the ANH group and 291 of 997 (29.2%) in the usual-care group received at least one allogeneic red-cell transfusion (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.07; P = 0.34). Surgery for postoperative bleeding was performed in 38 of 1004 patients (3.8%) in the ANH group and 26 of 995 patients (2.6%) in the usual-care group. Death within 30 days or during hospitalization occurred in 14 of 1008 patients (1.4%) in the ANH group and 16 of 997 patients (1.6%) in the usual-care group. Safety outcomes were similar in the two groups.
Conclusions: Among adults undergoing cardiac surgery, ANH did not reduce the number of patients receiving allogeneic red-cell transfusion. (Funded by the Italian Ministry of Health; ANH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03913481.).
{"title":"A Randomized Trial of Acute Normovolemic Hemodilution in Cardiac Surgery.","authors":"Fabrizio Monaco, Chong Lei, Matteo Aldo Bonizzoni, Sergey Efremov, Federica Morselli, Fabio Guarracino, Giuseppe Giardina, Cristina Arangino, Domenico Pontillo, Michelangelo Vitiello, Alessandro Belletti, Valentina Ajello, Margherita Licheri, Caetano Nigro Neto, Gaia Barucco, Nazar A Bukamal, Carolina Faustini, Lorenzo Filippo Mantovani, Alessandro Oriani, Cristina Santonocito, Marta Mucchetti, Francesco Federici, Chiara Gerli, Sabrina Porta, Anna Mara Scandroglio, Hui Zhang, Marina Pieri, Roman Osinsky, Stefano Lazzari, Elizaveta Leonova, Maria Grazia Calabrò, Daniele Amitrano, Stefano Turi, Paolo Prati, Stefano Fresilli, Filippo D'Amico, Jacopo D'Andria Ursoleo, Rosa Labanca, Marilena Marmiere, Alessandro Pruna, Tommaso Scquizzato, Kaan Kırali, Giacomo Monti, Maria José Carvalho Carmona, Kenichi Tanaka, Valery Likhvantsev, Lian Kah Ti, Tiziana Bove, Gianluca Paternoster, Karen Singh, Mustafa Emre Gürcü, Vladimir Lomivorotov, Giovanni Landoni, Rinaldo Bellomo, Alberto Zangrillo","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2504948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2504948","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing cardiac surgery often receive red-cell transfusions, along with the associated risks and costs. Early intraoperative normovolemic hemodilution (i.e., acute normovolemic hemodilution [ANH]) is a blood-conservation technique that entails autologous blood collection before initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass and reinfusion of the collected blood after bypass weaning. More data are needed on whether ANH reduces the number of patients receiving allogeneic red-cell transfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multinational, single-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults from 32 centers and 11 countries who were undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass to receive ANH (withdrawal of ≥650 ml of whole blood with crystalloids replacement if needed) or usual care. The primary outcome was the transfusion of at least one unit of allogeneic red cells during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes were death from any cause within 30 days after surgery or during the hospitalization for surgery, bleeding complications, ischemic complications, and acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2010 patients underwent randomization; 1010 were assigned to ANH and 1000 to usual care. Among patients with available data, 274 of 1005 (27.3%) in the ANH group and 291 of 997 (29.2%) in the usual-care group received at least one allogeneic red-cell transfusion (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.07; P = 0.34). Surgery for postoperative bleeding was performed in 38 of 1004 patients (3.8%) in the ANH group and 26 of 995 patients (2.6%) in the usual-care group. Death within 30 days or during hospitalization occurred in 14 of 1008 patients (1.4%) in the ANH group and 16 of 997 patients (1.6%) in the usual-care group. Safety outcomes were similar in the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among adults undergoing cardiac surgery, ANH did not reduce the number of patients receiving allogeneic red-cell transfusion. (Funded by the Italian Ministry of Health; ANH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03913481.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144276725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Regan W Bergmark, Yuh-Shin Chang, Orhan Efe, Soma Jobbagy
{"title":"Case 16-2025: A 34-Year-Old Man with a Nasopharyngeal Mass.","authors":"Regan W Bergmark, Yuh-Shin Chang, Orhan Efe, Soma Jobbagy","doi":"10.1056/NEJMcpc2412524","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcpc2412524","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"392 22","pages":"2257-2265"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144276729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-06-12Epub Date: 2025-05-28DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2503576
Amanda N Kallen, Shannon Whirledge, Kara N Goldman, Joshua Johnson
{"title":"Undermining Women's Health Research - Gambling with the Public's Health.","authors":"Amanda N Kallen, Shannon Whirledge, Kara N Goldman, Joshua Johnson","doi":"10.1056/NEJMp2503576","DOIUrl":"10.1056/NEJMp2503576","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2185-2187"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144174891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}