Pub Date : 2026-09-04DOI: 10.1108/intr-10-2025-1707
Baozhou Lu,Jun Gao,Chengwei Li
Purpose With the emergence of generative AI (GenAI), proactive services that initiate actions on behalf of users without explicit prompts are becoming increasingly prevalent. Although such services can enhance human-AI interaction, emerging evidence suggests that GenAI proactivity may also elicit adverse user reactions. To reconcile these mixed findings, this research examines why and when GenAI's proactive services positively and negatively influence users' usage intention. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on mind perception theory, we develop a dual-pathway model proposing that increased proactivity simultaneously enhances perceived agency and diminishes perceived control. We further propose that task type (hedonic vs. utilitarian) determines the relative dominance of these two pathways. We test these predictions through two scenario-based experiments. Study 1 examines the dual-pathway model in a health assistant context, whereas Study 2 investigates the moderating role of task type in a shopping assistant context. Findings Study 1 demonstrates that high (vs. low) proactivity simultaneously increases perceived agency and reduces perceived control. Study 2 shows that task type moderates these effects: for the hedonic task, the positive pathway through perceived agency dominates, making high proactivity more favorable; for the utilitarian task, the negative pathway through perceived control prevails, making low proactivity more preferred. Originality/value This research advances the literature on GenAI's proactive services by demonstrating that their double-edged effects operate through parallel enabling and constraining pathways. We also extend mind perception theory by revealing the psychological costs of agency attribution. Practically, the findings offer actionable insights for firms seeking to tailor GenAI functionalities to enhance user experience and foster usage across diverse digital business contexts.
{"title":"The double-edged sword of proactive GenAI: how it shapes user usage intention","authors":"Baozhou Lu,Jun Gao,Chengwei Li","doi":"10.1108/intr-10-2025-1707","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-10-2025-1707","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose With the emergence of generative AI (GenAI), proactive services that initiate actions on behalf of users without explicit prompts are becoming increasingly prevalent. Although such services can enhance human-AI interaction, emerging evidence suggests that GenAI proactivity may also elicit adverse user reactions. To reconcile these mixed findings, this research examines why and when GenAI's proactive services positively and negatively influence users' usage intention. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on mind perception theory, we develop a dual-pathway model proposing that increased proactivity simultaneously enhances perceived agency and diminishes perceived control. We further propose that task type (hedonic vs. utilitarian) determines the relative dominance of these two pathways. We test these predictions through two scenario-based experiments. Study 1 examines the dual-pathway model in a health assistant context, whereas Study 2 investigates the moderating role of task type in a shopping assistant context. Findings Study 1 demonstrates that high (vs. low) proactivity simultaneously increases perceived agency and reduces perceived control. Study 2 shows that task type moderates these effects: for the hedonic task, the positive pathway through perceived agency dominates, making high proactivity more favorable; for the utilitarian task, the negative pathway through perceived control prevails, making low proactivity more preferred. Originality/value This research advances the literature on GenAI's proactive services by demonstrating that their double-edged effects operate through parallel enabling and constraining pathways. We also extend mind perception theory by revealing the psychological costs of agency attribution. Practically, the findings offer actionable insights for firms seeking to tailor GenAI functionalities to enhance user experience and foster usage across diverse digital business contexts.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148894842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-09-03DOI: 10.1108/intr-05-2025-0695
Xiaodan Liu,Mengyao Zhao,Chao Su
Purpose Social networking services provide users with effective tools to connect with others and manage increasingly large social networks. However, users often face a “connectivity paradox,” where the advantages of network expansion are offset by the role stress induced by these technologies. To address this paradox, this study employed the holistic technostress model to investigate the dual effects of technostress on users' lurking intention through the lens of perceived post-adoption regret. Design/methodology/approach Survey data were collected from 641 Chinese WeChat users. The model and hypotheses testing were conducted using SmartPLS 4.0. Findings The findings revealed that challenge technostressors (i.e. social interaction) reduce lurking intention by strengthening perceived tie strength, while hindrance technostressors (i.e. role stress) increase lurking intention by intensifying perceived impression management dissatisfaction. Furthermore, perceived impression management dissatisfaction can heighten perceived post-adoption regret, further amplifying lurking intention. Although perceived tie strength can partially alleviate lurking intention, strong perceived tie strength may paradoxically exacerbate them by increasing perceived post-adoption regret. Originality/value Anchored in the holistic technostress model, this study explores the impacts of challenge and hindrance technostress on users' lurking intention and uncovers the dual effects of social networking services (SNS) technological affordances in the post-adoption stage. Drawing on a role-based theoretical lens, this research further elucidates the underexamined “relationship-maintenance paradox” in the SNS context. By integrating the construct of post-adoption regret, the present study reconceptualizes lurking as a maladaptive coping strategy, which challenges the mainstream scholarly view that frames lurking as a normative and benign user behavior. This theoretical reframing offers an in-depth insight into lurking behaviors, clarifying that such behaviors essentially stem from users' negative emotional responses to role-related technostress.
{"title":"The dual impact of technostress on social networking services users' lurking intention: a post-adoption regret perspective","authors":"Xiaodan Liu,Mengyao Zhao,Chao Su","doi":"10.1108/intr-05-2025-0695","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-05-2025-0695","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Social networking services provide users with effective tools to connect with others and manage increasingly large social networks. However, users often face a “connectivity paradox,” where the advantages of network expansion are offset by the role stress induced by these technologies. To address this paradox, this study employed the holistic technostress model to investigate the dual effects of technostress on users' lurking intention through the lens of perceived post-adoption regret. Design/methodology/approach Survey data were collected from 641 Chinese WeChat users. The model and hypotheses testing were conducted using SmartPLS 4.0. Findings The findings revealed that challenge technostressors (i.e. social interaction) reduce lurking intention by strengthening perceived tie strength, while hindrance technostressors (i.e. role stress) increase lurking intention by intensifying perceived impression management dissatisfaction. Furthermore, perceived impression management dissatisfaction can heighten perceived post-adoption regret, further amplifying lurking intention. Although perceived tie strength can partially alleviate lurking intention, strong perceived tie strength may paradoxically exacerbate them by increasing perceived post-adoption regret. Originality/value Anchored in the holistic technostress model, this study explores the impacts of challenge and hindrance technostress on users' lurking intention and uncovers the dual effects of social networking services (SNS) technological affordances in the post-adoption stage. Drawing on a role-based theoretical lens, this research further elucidates the underexamined “relationship-maintenance paradox” in the SNS context. By integrating the construct of post-adoption regret, the present study reconceptualizes lurking as a maladaptive coping strategy, which challenges the mainstream scholarly view that frames lurking as a normative and benign user behavior. This theoretical reframing offers an in-depth insight into lurking behaviors, clarifying that such behaviors essentially stem from users' negative emotional responses to role-related technostress.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"127 1","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148894839","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-08-25DOI: 10.1108/intr-10-2025-1756
Fei Wang,Zhecheng Liu,Fang Wang,Zhen Zhu,Shan Wang
Purpose E-commerce platforms increasingly deploy generative AI (GAI) to summarize large volumes of customer reviews. This study examines sentiment distribution bias in platform-provided GAI review summaries, defined as distortion in the relative representation of positive, neutral and negative sentiment compared with their proportional presence in the associated review corpus. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in information theory, we characterize four sentiment distribution bias patterns and develop an input-output framework linking source review characteristics and summary design features to sentiment bias. We analyzed data from an online travel platform covering 847 Tokyo hotels with GAI review summaries linked to 111,115 customer reviews to assess sentiment bias and conducted a complementary experiment to examine downstream consumer responses. Findings The platform's GAI review summaries exhibited predominant positive bias: positive sentiment was overrepresented, whereas neutral and negative sentiments were underrepresented relative to the review corpora. Lower source review volume, higher rating entropy and lower positive imbalance were associated with greater sentiment bias, whereas longer summaries, greater attribute granularity and lower attribute sentiment diversity were associated with lower bias. An experimental study showed that, relative to a low-bias summary, a GAI review summary with greater positive bias improved consumers' attitude toward the hotel and increased booking intention, despite being perceived as less helpful. Originality/value This research documents sentiment distribution bias in platform-provided GAI review summaries, identifies input and output conditions under which such bias varies and examines its consequences for consumer responses. The findings extend the online review and GAI literatures while informing platform governance and responsible GAI deployment.
{"title":"Sentiment distribution bias in AI-generated review summaries","authors":"Fei Wang,Zhecheng Liu,Fang Wang,Zhen Zhu,Shan Wang","doi":"10.1108/intr-10-2025-1756","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-10-2025-1756","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose E-commerce platforms increasingly deploy generative AI (GAI) to summarize large volumes of customer reviews. This study examines sentiment distribution bias in platform-provided GAI review summaries, defined as distortion in the relative representation of positive, neutral and negative sentiment compared with their proportional presence in the associated review corpus. Design/methodology/approach Grounded in information theory, we characterize four sentiment distribution bias patterns and develop an input-output framework linking source review characteristics and summary design features to sentiment bias. We analyzed data from an online travel platform covering 847 Tokyo hotels with GAI review summaries linked to 111,115 customer reviews to assess sentiment bias and conducted a complementary experiment to examine downstream consumer responses. Findings The platform's GAI review summaries exhibited predominant positive bias: positive sentiment was overrepresented, whereas neutral and negative sentiments were underrepresented relative to the review corpora. Lower source review volume, higher rating entropy and lower positive imbalance were associated with greater sentiment bias, whereas longer summaries, greater attribute granularity and lower attribute sentiment diversity were associated with lower bias. An experimental study showed that, relative to a low-bias summary, a GAI review summary with greater positive bias improved consumers' attitude toward the hotel and increased booking intention, despite being perceived as less helpful. Originality/value This research documents sentiment distribution bias in platform-provided GAI review summaries, identifies input and output conditions under which such bias varies and examines its consequences for consumer responses. The findings extend the online review and GAI literatures while informing platform governance and responsible GAI deployment.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148894892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-08-25DOI: 10.1108/intr-03-2026-0474
Min Tian,Zhenyu Li,Sigen Song
Purpose This study aims to resolve a key paradox in influencer marketing: why brands are increasingly designing virtual influencers with aesthetic imperfections (e.g. freckles), despite conventional wisdom suggesting that perfection is key. It investigates when and why these imperfections enhance consumer engagement, specifically by comparing their effects on virtual versus human influencers. Design/methodology/approach The research employs two main experiments and a supplementary robustness study. Participants were exposed to images of either a virtual or a human influencer, both manipulated to have aesthetic imperfections. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and a moderated mediation model to test the proposed theoretical framework. Findings The two main studies show that aesthetically imperfect virtual influencers elicit higher consumer engagement than aesthetically imperfect human influencers, partly through perceived scarcity. A supplementary study further rules out perceived authenticity and anthropomorphism as alternative mediators and shows that the effect extends to purchase intention, especially under symbolic product appeal framing. Practical implications Brands can enhance virtual influencer engagement by using minor aesthetic imperfections as scarcity cues, especially for consumers seeking uniqueness and symbolic products. Originality/value This study compares consumer responses to aesthetic imperfections in virtual and human influencers. It helps reconcile mixed findings in the literature and advances theory by identifying perceived scarcity as a psychological mechanism that enhances virtual influencer appeal. The study also extends scarcity theory to the digital context and offers practical guidance for designing “perfectly imperfect” virtual personas that engage targeted consumer segments.
{"title":"When are imperfections beneficial? The impact of aesthetic imperfections in virtual and human influencers on consumer engagement","authors":"Min Tian,Zhenyu Li,Sigen Song","doi":"10.1108/intr-03-2026-0474","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-03-2026-0474","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to resolve a key paradox in influencer marketing: why brands are increasingly designing virtual influencers with aesthetic imperfections (e.g. freckles), despite conventional wisdom suggesting that perfection is key. It investigates when and why these imperfections enhance consumer engagement, specifically by comparing their effects on virtual versus human influencers. Design/methodology/approach The research employs two main experiments and a supplementary robustness study. Participants were exposed to images of either a virtual or a human influencer, both manipulated to have aesthetic imperfections. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and a moderated mediation model to test the proposed theoretical framework. Findings The two main studies show that aesthetically imperfect virtual influencers elicit higher consumer engagement than aesthetically imperfect human influencers, partly through perceived scarcity. A supplementary study further rules out perceived authenticity and anthropomorphism as alternative mediators and shows that the effect extends to purchase intention, especially under symbolic product appeal framing. Practical implications Brands can enhance virtual influencer engagement by using minor aesthetic imperfections as scarcity cues, especially for consumers seeking uniqueness and symbolic products. Originality/value This study compares consumer responses to aesthetic imperfections in virtual and human influencers. It helps reconcile mixed findings in the literature and advances theory by identifying perceived scarcity as a psychological mechanism that enhances virtual influencer appeal. The study also extends scarcity theory to the digital context and offers practical guidance for designing “perfectly imperfect” virtual personas that engage targeted consumer segments.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148895955","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-08-24DOI: 10.1108/intr-08-2025-1182
Miklesh Prasad Yadav,Pratiksha Jha,Shakeb Akhtar
Purpose To analyze shock transmission, shock absorption and systemic interconnectedness in decentralized cryptocurrency markets by examining how structural differences across cryptocurrency subcategories (green, energy and Bitcoin Gold) influence contagion dynamics and network resilience. Design/methodology/approach This study employs an R-squared decomposed connectedness approach to investigate contemporaneous and lagged spillovers among eight cryptocurrencies that have been classified as green (Cardano, XRP, Polygon and Stellar), energy-centric (Powerledger, Electrify Asia and Sun Contract) and Bitcoin Gold for the period ranging from December 31, 2019 to July 22, 2024. It evaluates directional shock transmission (“TO”), shock absorption (“FROM”) and net connectedness to identify the role of individual assets as transmitters and receivers within the network. Additionally, hedge ratios and portfolio weights are calculated to offer insights into diversification potential and hedging effectiveness across cryptocurrency subcategories. Findings The findings indicate a high degree of systemic interconnectedness among closely linked decentralized networks. Contemporaneous connectedness is more pronounced than lagged connectedness, indicating rapid information diffusion within cryptocurrency platforms. Network diffusion analysis identifies Stellar and Cardano as net transmitters (sneezers), and Sun Contract and Electrify Asia as net receivers (catchers), exhibiting systemic risk elevation and diversification capabilities, respectively. Originality/value This study contributes to Information Systems research by integrating digital contagion theory and a socio-technical perspective into the empirical analysis of cryptocurrency platforms. It introduces network-based decomposition of connectedness to differentiate between immediate and persistent contagion and offers one of the initial empirical analyses of heterogeneity across cryptocurrency subcategories. This study connects infrastructure design with contagion dynamics and provides innovative perspectives on governance-by-design, network resilience and systemic vulnerabilities in developing a digital ecosystem.
{"title":"Sneezers or catchers of shock among green cryptocurrencies, energy cryptocurrencies and Bitcoin Gold: an R-squared decomposed connectedness","authors":"Miklesh Prasad Yadav,Pratiksha Jha,Shakeb Akhtar","doi":"10.1108/intr-08-2025-1182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2025-1182","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To analyze shock transmission, shock absorption and systemic interconnectedness in decentralized cryptocurrency markets by examining how structural differences across cryptocurrency subcategories (green, energy and Bitcoin Gold) influence contagion dynamics and network resilience. Design/methodology/approach This study employs an R-squared decomposed connectedness approach to investigate contemporaneous and lagged spillovers among eight cryptocurrencies that have been classified as green (Cardano, XRP, Polygon and Stellar), energy-centric (Powerledger, Electrify Asia and Sun Contract) and Bitcoin Gold for the period ranging from December 31, 2019 to July 22, 2024. It evaluates directional shock transmission (“TO”), shock absorption (“FROM”) and net connectedness to identify the role of individual assets as transmitters and receivers within the network. Additionally, hedge ratios and portfolio weights are calculated to offer insights into diversification potential and hedging effectiveness across cryptocurrency subcategories. Findings The findings indicate a high degree of systemic interconnectedness among closely linked decentralized networks. Contemporaneous connectedness is more pronounced than lagged connectedness, indicating rapid information diffusion within cryptocurrency platforms. Network diffusion analysis identifies Stellar and Cardano as net transmitters (sneezers), and Sun Contract and Electrify Asia as net receivers (catchers), exhibiting systemic risk elevation and diversification capabilities, respectively. Originality/value This study contributes to Information Systems research by integrating digital contagion theory and a socio-technical perspective into the empirical analysis of cryptocurrency platforms. It introduces network-based decomposition of connectedness to differentiate between immediate and persistent contagion and offers one of the initial empirical analyses of heterogeneity across cryptocurrency subcategories. This study connects infrastructure design with contagion dynamics and provides innovative perspectives on governance-by-design, network resilience and systemic vulnerabilities in developing a digital ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148894843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-08-24DOI: 10.1108/intr-10-2025-1753
Keyu Cui,Shan Liu,Chenze Wang,Yang Liu,Xiaoxiao Liu
Purpose Generative AI (GAI) is transforming user-generated content (UGC) communities, yet its impact on professional creators remains underexplored. This study examines how the platform-level integration of a GAI illustration tool into an online artist community influences designers' original content contributions and how these effects vary by designer characteristics. Design/methodology/approach We use 12 months of panel data on 43,587 active designers from a leading online creative platform. Leveraging the platform's introduction of a free GAI illustration tool in October 2022 as a natural experiment, we employ a difference-in-differences design to estimate its effect on designers' original work postings. Findings The results indicate that integrating the GAI tool increases original content contributions by 25%. This effect is driven by multiple mechanisms, including competitive pressure, learning-oriented engagement, and copyright concerns. In particular, competitive pressure induces strategic effort reallocation, leading designers to reduce contributions within their primary domains and shift effort toward less-affected creative areas. Moderation analyses further show that this reallocation effect is stronger among newer and lower-reputation designers. Originality/value Amid growing interest in the impact of GAI, this study centers on the creative domain, shifting the focus from GAI's influence on creative processes to its effects on professional content contributions in online communities. It identifies key mechanisms – competitive pressure, learning-oriented engagement, and copyright concerns – arising from platform-level GAI integration. The findings provide theoretical and practical insights for managing creative platforms in the era of GAI integration.
{"title":"When platforms integrate generative AI: the dynamics of professional contribution in artist communities","authors":"Keyu Cui,Shan Liu,Chenze Wang,Yang Liu,Xiaoxiao Liu","doi":"10.1108/intr-10-2025-1753","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-10-2025-1753","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Generative AI (GAI) is transforming user-generated content (UGC) communities, yet its impact on professional creators remains underexplored. This study examines how the platform-level integration of a GAI illustration tool into an online artist community influences designers' original content contributions and how these effects vary by designer characteristics. Design/methodology/approach We use 12 months of panel data on 43,587 active designers from a leading online creative platform. Leveraging the platform's introduction of a free GAI illustration tool in October 2022 as a natural experiment, we employ a difference-in-differences design to estimate its effect on designers' original work postings. Findings The results indicate that integrating the GAI tool increases original content contributions by 25%. This effect is driven by multiple mechanisms, including competitive pressure, learning-oriented engagement, and copyright concerns. In particular, competitive pressure induces strategic effort reallocation, leading designers to reduce contributions within their primary domains and shift effort toward less-affected creative areas. Moderation analyses further show that this reallocation effect is stronger among newer and lower-reputation designers. Originality/value Amid growing interest in the impact of GAI, this study centers on the creative domain, shifting the focus from GAI's influence on creative processes to its effects on professional content contributions in online communities. It identifies key mechanisms – competitive pressure, learning-oriented engagement, and copyright concerns – arising from platform-level GAI integration. The findings provide theoretical and practical insights for managing creative platforms in the era of GAI integration.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148894841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-08-14DOI: 10.1108/intr-12-2025-2032
Chenkai Bao,Jie Wang,Zheng Zhang
Purpose This study explores the paradoxical impact of fraud alert features on user satisfaction in age-friendly applications and examines how the personality traits Openness and Neuroticism moderate this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on 7,516 user reviews of an age-friendly music application collected from April 2021 to November 2024, we employ large language model–based (LLM-based) personality inference to identify users' psychological traits. Ordinary least squares regressions with brand fixed effects are applied to test the direct and moderating effects of fraud alert feature within a self-efficacy theoretical framework. Findings Results indicate that fraud alert features are significantly associated with lower user satisfaction, contradicting the common belief that security innovations are universally beneficial. Users high in Openness experience less dissatisfaction by viewing alerts as learning opportunities, while those high in Neuroticism show stronger dissatisfaction due to anxiety and perceived competence threats. These personality effects are more pronounced in contexts with fewer likes and lower review activity. Originality/value This study is among the first to integrate personality psychology with self-efficacy theory to explain heterogeneous responses to security features in age-friendly software. It introduces a scalable LLM-based personality measurement method and highlights the need for personality-aware, context-sensitive design strategies to balance protection and satisfaction in digital aging solutions.
{"title":"Do fraud alert features improve user satisfaction? Evidence from large language model–based personality traits in online reviews","authors":"Chenkai Bao,Jie Wang,Zheng Zhang","doi":"10.1108/intr-12-2025-2032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-12-2025-2032","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study explores the paradoxical impact of fraud alert features on user satisfaction in age-friendly applications and examines how the personality traits Openness and Neuroticism moderate this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on 7,516 user reviews of an age-friendly music application collected from April 2021 to November 2024, we employ large language model–based (LLM-based) personality inference to identify users' psychological traits. Ordinary least squares regressions with brand fixed effects are applied to test the direct and moderating effects of fraud alert feature within a self-efficacy theoretical framework. Findings Results indicate that fraud alert features are significantly associated with lower user satisfaction, contradicting the common belief that security innovations are universally beneficial. Users high in Openness experience less dissatisfaction by viewing alerts as learning opportunities, while those high in Neuroticism show stronger dissatisfaction due to anxiety and perceived competence threats. These personality effects are more pronounced in contexts with fewer likes and lower review activity. Originality/value This study is among the first to integrate personality psychology with self-efficacy theory to explain heterogeneous responses to security features in age-friendly software. It introduces a scalable LLM-based personality measurement method and highlights the need for personality-aware, context-sensitive design strategies to balance protection and satisfaction in digital aging solutions.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148894570","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose Grounded in signaling theory, this study examines whether traceability information displaces or complements incumbent quality cues and contrasts the relative efficacy of blockchain-enabled traceability technologies with traditional systems. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes 18 months of product-level sales data from a global e-commerce platform using a staggered difference-in-differences design with robustness checks. We apply latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling to consumer reviews and use a synthetic difference-in-differences approach to examine shifts in consumer attention after traceability implementation. Findings Traceability information increases product sales, particularly for lower-reputation brands and diminishes the effect of electronic word-of-mouth, suggesting that diagnostic quality signals matter more than social information signals. Although blockchain-enabled traceability should enhance signal credibility, its observed impact falls short of expectations. Research limitations/implications The sample is limited to the automotive engine oil context in China. Future research should examine other categories and national contexts. Practical implications Platform managers and emerging brands can deploy low-cost traceability labels to boost demand. Blockchain solutions may require consumer education to justify higher implementation costs. Social implications Augmenting supply-chain transparency and product traceability curbs counterfeit and substandard goods, improves consumer welfare, and supports regulatory and sustainability objectives. Originality/value This study systematically assesses the substitutive and complementary roles of traceability signals in a multi-cue setting, tempers optimism about blockchain-enabled traceability and extends research on digital supply-chain transparency and signaling theory.
{"title":"The impact of traceability information on consumer purchase behavior in e-commerce platforms","authors":"Mingqian Li,Rong Du,Andrew Burton-Jones,Jianing Xie","doi":"10.1108/intr-08-2025-1158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-08-2025-1158","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Grounded in signaling theory, this study examines whether traceability information displaces or complements incumbent quality cues and contrasts the relative efficacy of blockchain-enabled traceability technologies with traditional systems. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzes 18 months of product-level sales data from a global e-commerce platform using a staggered difference-in-differences design with robustness checks. We apply latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling to consumer reviews and use a synthetic difference-in-differences approach to examine shifts in consumer attention after traceability implementation. Findings Traceability information increases product sales, particularly for lower-reputation brands and diminishes the effect of electronic word-of-mouth, suggesting that diagnostic quality signals matter more than social information signals. Although blockchain-enabled traceability should enhance signal credibility, its observed impact falls short of expectations. Research limitations/implications The sample is limited to the automotive engine oil context in China. Future research should examine other categories and national contexts. Practical implications Platform managers and emerging brands can deploy low-cost traceability labels to boost demand. Blockchain solutions may require consumer education to justify higher implementation costs. Social implications Augmenting supply-chain transparency and product traceability curbs counterfeit and substandard goods, improves consumer welfare, and supports regulatory and sustainability objectives. Originality/value This study systematically assesses the substitutive and complementary roles of traceability signals in a multi-cue setting, tempers optimism about blockchain-enabled traceability and extends research on digital supply-chain transparency and signaling theory.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148894578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-08-11DOI: 10.1108/intr-03-2025-0424
Liang Ma,Zhihao Qi,Xin Zhang,Feifei Hao
Purpose This paper aims to examine the relationship between employees' use of artificial intelligence (AI) for work and digital-enabled innovative performance (DEIP) from the perspective of employee engagement and trust in AI. Based on these perspectives, this study identifies specific solutions for achieving high levels of DEIP. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on job demands-resources (JD-R) theory and analyzing data from 431 employees, this paper proposes a research model to investigate how employee AI use affects employees' DEIP through partial least squares structural equation modeling and highlights the configurations of causal conditions associated with DEIP through fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Findings The results show that AI use for work exerts the strongest positive impact on employees' behavioral engagement, followed by emotional and cognitive engagement. Employee engagement (three types mention before) play a partial mediating role between work-related AI and DEIP. Furthermore, both human-like and functionality trust in AI positively moderate the relationship between work-related AI and behavioral engagement. Finally, a total of four solutions leads to a high level of DEIP. Practical implications Organizations should enhance employees' engagement and trust in AI through training and supportive implementation strategies. Managers should adopt context-sensitive approaches that align AI use, engagement and trust to improve DEIP. Originality/value Firstly, this study enriches the literature on DEIP and JD-R theory by exploring the AI-performance link via employee engagement. Secondly, this paper supplements work-related AI literature by clarifying AI trust's boundary conditions. Thirdly, this paper contributes to the performance literature by identifying key solutions for DEIP from a configuration perspective.
{"title":"How employees' AI use contributes to digital-enabled innovative performance","authors":"Liang Ma,Zhihao Qi,Xin Zhang,Feifei Hao","doi":"10.1108/intr-03-2025-0424","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-03-2025-0424","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to examine the relationship between employees' use of artificial intelligence (AI) for work and digital-enabled innovative performance (DEIP) from the perspective of employee engagement and trust in AI. Based on these perspectives, this study identifies specific solutions for achieving high levels of DEIP. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on job demands-resources (JD-R) theory and analyzing data from 431 employees, this paper proposes a research model to investigate how employee AI use affects employees' DEIP through partial least squares structural equation modeling and highlights the configurations of causal conditions associated with DEIP through fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). Findings The results show that AI use for work exerts the strongest positive impact on employees' behavioral engagement, followed by emotional and cognitive engagement. Employee engagement (three types mention before) play a partial mediating role between work-related AI and DEIP. Furthermore, both human-like and functionality trust in AI positively moderate the relationship between work-related AI and behavioral engagement. Finally, a total of four solutions leads to a high level of DEIP. Practical implications Organizations should enhance employees' engagement and trust in AI through training and supportive implementation strategies. Managers should adopt context-sensitive approaches that align AI use, engagement and trust to improve DEIP. Originality/value Firstly, this study enriches the literature on DEIP and JD-R theory by exploring the AI-performance link via employee engagement. Secondly, this paper supplements work-related AI literature by clarifying AI trust's boundary conditions. Thirdly, this paper contributes to the performance literature by identifying key solutions for DEIP from a configuration perspective.","PeriodicalId":54925,"journal":{"name":"Internet Research","volume":"147 1","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148894572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}