PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA BY MEMBERS OF THE RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF JEHOVAHS WITNESSES

A. Świątkowski
{"title":"PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA BY MEMBERS OF THE RELIGIOUS COMMUNITY OF JEHOVAHS WITNESSES","authors":"A. Świątkowski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.3228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author presents a dispute in Finland over a decision prohibiting the religious community of Jehovahs Witnesses from collecting and otherwise processing personal data as part of the preaching activity. The public authorities of this country have recognized that the community and its members are controllers of personal data and entities responsible for the processing of such data. According to the community, preaching is an individual religious practice. Data collected solely on the personal initiative of the members of the Jehovahs Witness community do not constitute a dataset, and the community cannot be considered a controller of personal data. In the questions referred for a preliminary ruling, the referring court took the position that such activity is not subject to the exemption provided for in Art. 3 sec.1st indent of Directive 95/46. He was not sure, however, that the preaching activity could be considered a purely personal or domestic activity within the meaning of Art. 3 sec. 2nd indent of Directive 95/46. The Grand Chamber of the CJEU delivered a balanced judgment taking into account, on the one hand, the right to respect for private life and, on the other hand, the equally important right to freedom of religion.","PeriodicalId":158454,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.3228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author presents a dispute in Finland over a decision prohibiting the religious community of Jehovahs Witnesses from collecting and otherwise processing personal data as part of the preaching activity. The public authorities of this country have recognized that the community and its members are controllers of personal data and entities responsible for the processing of such data. According to the community, preaching is an individual religious practice. Data collected solely on the personal initiative of the members of the Jehovahs Witness community do not constitute a dataset, and the community cannot be considered a controller of personal data. In the questions referred for a preliminary ruling, the referring court took the position that such activity is not subject to the exemption provided for in Art. 3 sec.1st indent of Directive 95/46. He was not sure, however, that the preaching activity could be considered a purely personal or domestic activity within the meaning of Art. 3 sec. 2nd indent of Directive 95/46. The Grand Chamber of the CJEU delivered a balanced judgment taking into account, on the one hand, the right to respect for private life and, on the other hand, the equally important right to freedom of religion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耶和华见证人宗教团体成员对个人资料的处理
发件人在芬兰提出了一项关于禁止耶和华见证人宗教团体收集和以其他方式处理个人资料作为传教活动一部分的决定的争议。这个国家的公共当局已经认识到,社区及其成员是个人数据的控制者和负责处理这些数据的实体。根据社区的说法,讲道是一种个人的宗教活动。仅由耶和华见证会社区成员个人主动收集的数据不构成数据集,社区不能被视为个人数据的控制者。在提交初步裁决的问题中,提交法院采取的立场是,这种活动不受95/46号指令第3条第1款所规定的豁免的约束。但是,他不确定讲道活动是否可以被视为95/46号指示第3条第2款所指的纯粹个人或家庭活动。欧洲法院的大分庭作出了平衡的判决,一方面考虑到尊重私人生活的权利,另一方面也考虑到同样重要的宗教自由权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
LEGAL STATUS OF THE ALBANIAN HIGH PROSECUTORIAL COUNCIL IN THE LIGHT OF THE 2016 CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM EFFECTIVENESS OF WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO APPEAL IN GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS WITH MULTIPLE PARTIES GLOSS TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME ADMINISTRATIVE COURT OF 6 NOVEMBER 2020, II OSK 2674/20 THE APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST SOLDIERS IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ACT ON THE DEFENSE OF THE HOMELAND CONCILIATION VERSUS MEDIATION IN INDIVIDUAL LABOR LAW CASES REFLECTIONS ON THE RUSSIAN FEBRUARY REVOLUTION OF 1917. SEVERAL HISTORICAL AND LEGAL REMARKS FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF 2022-2023
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1