{"title":"European environmental research in the social sciences: research into ecological modernization as a ‘boundary object’","authors":"L. Giorgi, M. Redclift","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-0976(200001/02)10:1<12::AID-EET213>3.0.CO;2-#","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the way that environmental policy and environmental research, in European social science, has reflected underlying paradigms of growth and development, to which the term ‘ecological modernization’ is often applied. We argue that what has been termed ‘ecological modernization’ is an essential part of the European project, and that this approach is already observable in much of the research undertaken by European social scientists. It means – inter alia – convergence in the use of materials and energy flows within EU countries, buttressed by regulatory frameworks, in such a way that Europe is placed on a competitive footing with North America and Japan, and indeed, able to seek, through ‘cleaner’ production methods and greener fiscal policies, to take the initiative in the modernization of production itself. This paper explores the ways in which this project has been translated into research, both at the level of the European Commission and within national research programmes, drawing on research undertaken for DGXII of the European Commission (contract ENV4-CT96-0190). On the basis of our research in six countries of the EU – the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Spain, Greece, Finland and Austria – we argue that the concept of ‘ecological modernization’ has served as a flag of convenience for disparate researchers and research systems, facilitating the establishment of research networks, practices and research agendas that span the very different research cultures of the EU. We go on to suggest the use of the concept of ‘boundary object’ from the sociology of knowledge (Star and Griesemer, 1989) as a way of understanding its attraction in academic and policy circles. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment","PeriodicalId":374097,"journal":{"name":"European Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0976(200001/02)10:1<12::AID-EET213>3.0.CO;2-#","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21
社会科学中的欧洲环境研究:作为“边界对象”的生态现代化研究
本文考察了欧洲社会科学中环境政策和环境研究反映增长和发展的基本范式的方式,“生态现代化”一词经常被应用于这些范式。我们认为,所谓的“生态现代化”是欧洲项目的重要组成部分,这种方法已经在欧洲社会科学家进行的许多研究中得到了观察。这意味着——除其他外——在监管框架的支持下,欧盟国家内部材料和能源流动的使用趋同,以这样一种方式,欧洲被置于与北美和日本竞争的基础上,并且能够通过“更清洁”的生产方法和更环保的财政政策,寻求在生产本身的现代化中采取主动。本文利用欧盟委员会DGXII(合同ENV4-CT96-0190)开展的研究,探讨了该项目在欧盟委员会和国家研究计划层面转化为研究的方式。基于我们在欧盟六个国家——荷兰、英国、西班牙、希腊、芬兰和奥地利——的研究,我们认为,“生态现代化”的概念已经成为不同的研究人员和研究系统的便利标志,促进了跨越欧盟非常不同的研究文化的研究网络、实践和研究议程的建立。我们继续建议使用知识社会学(Star and Griesemer, 1989)中的“边界对象”概念,作为理解其在学术和政策圈中的吸引力的一种方式。版权所有©2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd和ERP Environment
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。