{"title":"Introductory Note","authors":"G. Knoops, S. Pedroso","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The International Criminal Court (ICC) has experienced a burgeoning of activity in 2019, including new beginnings, such as the start of pre-trial proceedings against co-accused, Messrs. Alfred Yekatom and Ngaïssona, the commencement of trial in the case against Mr. Al Hassan, and the Pre-trial Chamber’s authorisation that an investigation be launched for the alleged crimes committed against the Rohingya in the Situation in Bangladesh/Myanmar. Two landmark acquittals were pronounced in early 2019 in the case against both Mr. Laurent Gbagbo and Mr. Charles Blé Goudé, culminating from no case to answer proceedings launched by the defence the previous year, and litigation went underway in the context of Mr. Jean-Pierre Bemba’s compensation claim following his acquittal by the Appeals Chamber, raising novel issues relating to the interpretation of Article 85 of the Rome Statute. The Court stirred controversy in unanimously rejecting the Prosecutor’s request to proceed with an investigation into alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes committed on the territory of Afghanistan, extending among others to the conduct of US troops, in the context of renewed pressures from the United States imposing sanctions against ICC staff. Further controversy arose from the Appeals Chamber’s confirmation of the Pre-Trial Chamber’s order in the Comoros case, whereby the Prosecutor was yet again ordered to review its decision to not investigate the situation. Additionally, judges’ independence and impartiality were at the heart of debates in the cases of Mr. Al Hassan and Mr. Ntaganda, whereby the respective defence teams launched recusal requests on the basis of certain judges’ concurrent professional activities and statements.","PeriodicalId":416751,"journal":{"name":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197618721.003.0032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has experienced a burgeoning of activity in 2019, including new beginnings, such as the start of pre-trial proceedings against co-accused, Messrs. Alfred Yekatom and Ngaïssona, the commencement of trial in the case against Mr. Al Hassan, and the Pre-trial Chamber’s authorisation that an investigation be launched for the alleged crimes committed against the Rohingya in the Situation in Bangladesh/Myanmar. Two landmark acquittals were pronounced in early 2019 in the case against both Mr. Laurent Gbagbo and Mr. Charles Blé Goudé, culminating from no case to answer proceedings launched by the defence the previous year, and litigation went underway in the context of Mr. Jean-Pierre Bemba’s compensation claim following his acquittal by the Appeals Chamber, raising novel issues relating to the interpretation of Article 85 of the Rome Statute. The Court stirred controversy in unanimously rejecting the Prosecutor’s request to proceed with an investigation into alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes committed on the territory of Afghanistan, extending among others to the conduct of US troops, in the context of renewed pressures from the United States imposing sanctions against ICC staff. Further controversy arose from the Appeals Chamber’s confirmation of the Pre-Trial Chamber’s order in the Comoros case, whereby the Prosecutor was yet again ordered to review its decision to not investigate the situation. Additionally, judges’ independence and impartiality were at the heart of debates in the cases of Mr. Al Hassan and Mr. Ntaganda, whereby the respective defence teams launched recusal requests on the basis of certain judges’ concurrent professional activities and statements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
介绍性的注意
国际刑事法院(ICC)在2019年经历了一系列活动,包括新的开端,例如开始对共同被告人阿尔弗雷德·叶卡托姆(Alfred Yekatom)先生和Ngaïssona先生提起审前诉讼,开始对哈桑先生的案件进行审判,以及预审分庭授权对据称在孟加拉国/缅甸局势中对罗兴亚人犯下的罪行展开调查。2019年初,针对洛朗·巴博先生和查尔斯·布莱斯·古达尔先生的案件宣布了两起具有里程碑意义的无罪释放,结束了前一年辩方发起的无案件答辩程序。在上诉分庭宣判让-皮埃尔·本巴先生无罪释放后,本巴先生提出了赔偿要求,这引发了与解释《罗马规约》第85条有关的新问题。在美国对国际刑事法院工作人员施加制裁的新压力的背景下,法院一致拒绝了检察官的要求,即对在阿富汗领土上犯下的危害人类罪和战争罪进行调查,其中包括美国军队的行为,这引起了争议。上诉分庭确认预审分庭对科摩罗案件的命令,再次命令检察官审查其不调查情况的决定,这引起了进一步的争议。此外,法官的独立性和公正性是哈桑先生和恩塔甘达先生案件辩论的核心,各自的辩护小组根据某些法官同时进行的专业活动和陈述提出回避请求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
China’s “Belt and Road Initiative”: A Research Study of a Multifaceted Policy From Pandemic to Apocalypse—Nuclear War as Terminal Disease Appendix of the Part—Topics Covered in the Previous Issues (2008–2019) Introductory Note Introductory Note
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1