The end of the roman habitation at Buridava (Stolniceni, Vâlcea county)

Silviu I. Purece
{"title":"The end of the roman habitation at Buridava (Stolniceni, Vâlcea county)","authors":"Silviu I. Purece","doi":"10.55201/hink1677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"# e fi ve archaeological levels identifi ed in the Roman baths complex area at Stolniceni, dated in the period of the existence of Dacia Province, were chronologically dated as following: the 1st level: Trajan- the fi rst part of Antoninus Pius’rule, the 2nd level: the last part of Antoninus Pius’rule up to Commodus’rule, the 3rd level: the Commodus – Caracalla period, the 4th level: the Caracalla – Philippus Arabs period and the 5th level: the Philippus Arabs-Aurelian period. # e end of these fi ve levels mentioned above was brought about by fi re and destruction, the most powerful ones were characteristic to the 3rd and 4th levels. Even if the archaeological information is scarce, we believe that we can rely on the supposition that some phenomena that were identifi ed in the thermae area might have had a great impact on the whole settlement. # e diff erence between accidental destructions and intentional destructions can be established due to a vast array of information obtained not only form the site in question but also from a larger area. # us, we consider that this approach should rely entirely on the historical information obtained as a result of a thorough analysis of the hoards horizon. Every hoards horizons represented in the region are associated with one destruction moment from the Roman baths, with one exception the horizon from the year 260. # is situation determine us to reevaluate the chronological situation and to establish that is very possible to place the end of the Roman Buridava not in the time of Aurelian but at the beginning of Gallienus reign as sole emperor.","PeriodicalId":265051,"journal":{"name":"Analele Banatului XX 2012","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analele Banatului XX 2012","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55201/hink1677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

# e fi ve archaeological levels identifi ed in the Roman baths complex area at Stolniceni, dated in the period of the existence of Dacia Province, were chronologically dated as following: the 1st level: Trajan- the fi rst part of Antoninus Pius’rule, the 2nd level: the last part of Antoninus Pius’rule up to Commodus’rule, the 3rd level: the Commodus – Caracalla period, the 4th level: the Caracalla – Philippus Arabs period and the 5th level: the Philippus Arabs-Aurelian period. # e end of these fi ve levels mentioned above was brought about by fi re and destruction, the most powerful ones were characteristic to the 3rd and 4th levels. Even if the archaeological information is scarce, we believe that we can rely on the supposition that some phenomena that were identifi ed in the thermae area might have had a great impact on the whole settlement. # e diff erence between accidental destructions and intentional destructions can be established due to a vast array of information obtained not only form the site in question but also from a larger area. # us, we consider that this approach should rely entirely on the historical information obtained as a result of a thorough analysis of the hoards horizon. Every hoards horizons represented in the region are associated with one destruction moment from the Roman baths, with one exception the horizon from the year 260. # is situation determine us to reevaluate the chronological situation and to establish that is very possible to place the end of the Roman Buridava not in the time of Aurelian but at the beginning of Gallienus reign as sole emperor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马人在布里达瓦(斯托尔尼塞尼,v勒恰县)居住的终结
# e fi ve考古水平identifi艾德在罗马浴场Stolniceni复杂的领域,过时的达契亚省的存在,日期顺序如下:1级:图拉真- fi rst的一部分安东尼庇护'rule, 2级:安东尼庇护的最后一部分'rule康茂德'rule, 3级:科莫多斯-卡拉卡拉期间,4级:卡拉卡拉- Philippus阿拉伯人期间和5级:在Philippus Arabs-Aurelian时期。这五个层次的最后是火和破坏,最强烈的是第三和第四层次的特征。即使考古资料很少,我们相信我们可以依靠这样的假设,即在热区发现的一些现象可能对整个定居点产生了很大的影响。意外破坏和故意破坏之间的区别可以建立在大量信息的基础上,这些信息不仅来自有问题的地点,而且来自更大的区域。因此,我们认为这种方法应完全依赖于对库存水平进行彻底分析所获得的历史信息。该地区的每一个地平线都与罗马浴场的一个毁灭时刻有关,只有一个例外是260年的地平线。这种情况决定了我们重新评估时间顺序,并确定罗马布里达瓦的结束很可能不是在奥勒良的时代,而是在加利亚努斯作为唯一的皇帝统治的开始。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GIDÓ ATTILA, Holly Case, Between States. The Transylvanian Question and the European Idea during World War II, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2009, 349 p. Parohiile catolice din Banat în epoca lui Sigismund de Luxemburg / The Catholic Parishes of Banat in the Age of Sigismund of Luxembourg A reconsideration of the so called Isis statuette from Porolissum The Activity of Air Vice Marshal Donald F. Stevenson, Head of the British Military Mission in Romania (1944–1945) Artileria cetăţii Timişoara la 1716 / The Guns Of The Fortress Of Timişoara (Temesvar) in 1716
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1