Development of a Scale to Assess University Faculty’s Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Special Education

P. Chao, Yu-Chi Chou, Shin-Tzu Hu, Chiu-Hsia Huang
{"title":"Development of a Scale to Assess University Faculty’s Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in Special Education","authors":"P. Chao, Yu-Chi Chou, Shin-Tzu Hu, Chiu-Hsia Huang","doi":"10.36941/jesr-2024-0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing number of university students with disabilities, university professors play a significant role in teaching and assessment. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a scale to assess university faculty’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices in relation to providing special education services. A total of 210 faculty members recruited from 15 universities in Taiwan participated in this study. The sample included lecturers (n = 51), assistant professors (n = 75), associate professors (n = 66), and professors (n = 18). The proposed Faculty Perspectives on Special Education Scale (FPSES), a 32-item scale, includes three subscales: Special Education Knowledge (SEK), Attitudes Towards Students (ATS), and Provision of Services (POS). Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics, item analysis, correlation analysis, t tests, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results showed that FPSES has satisfactory internal consistency reliability, with Cronbach’s ? ranging from .93 to .96 and test-retest reliabilities, with coefficient ranging from .88 to .96. The FPSES also exhibited favorable content validity. Furthermore, the CFA confirmed a good fit between the proposed second-order model and the sample data, thereby ensuring the construct validity. In summary, FPSES is a favorable assessment tool with good psychometric properties, which provides insights into faculty perspectives, attitudes, and practices in the provision of special education services for university students with disabilities. Recommendations are provided for future research and the Office of Disability Services at the university.  \n  \nReceived: 29 March 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024","PeriodicalId":15617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","volume":"309 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing number of university students with disabilities, university professors play a significant role in teaching and assessment. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a scale to assess university faculty’s knowledge, attitudes, and practices in relation to providing special education services. A total of 210 faculty members recruited from 15 universities in Taiwan participated in this study. The sample included lecturers (n = 51), assistant professors (n = 75), associate professors (n = 66), and professors (n = 18). The proposed Faculty Perspectives on Special Education Scale (FPSES), a 32-item scale, includes three subscales: Special Education Knowledge (SEK), Attitudes Towards Students (ATS), and Provision of Services (POS). Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics, item analysis, correlation analysis, t tests, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results showed that FPSES has satisfactory internal consistency reliability, with Cronbach’s ? ranging from .93 to .96 and test-retest reliabilities, with coefficient ranging from .88 to .96. The FPSES also exhibited favorable content validity. Furthermore, the CFA confirmed a good fit between the proposed second-order model and the sample data, thereby ensuring the construct validity. In summary, FPSES is a favorable assessment tool with good psychometric properties, which provides insights into faculty perspectives, attitudes, and practices in the provision of special education services for university students with disabilities. Recommendations are provided for future research and the Office of Disability Services at the university.    Received: 29 March 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发评估大学教师特殊教育知识、态度和实践的量表
随着残疾大学生人数的不断增加,大学教授在教学和评估中发挥着重要作用。本研究旨在开发并验证一个量表,以评估大学教师在提供特殊教育服务方面的知识、态度和实践。共有 210 名来自台湾 15 所大学的教师参与了本研究。样本包括讲师(51 人)、助理教授(75 人)、副教授(66 人)和教授(18 人)。拟议的教师特殊教育视角量表(FPSES)共有 32 个项目,包括三个分量表:特殊教育知识(SEK)、对学生的态度(ATS)和提供服务(POS)。对收集到的数据进行了描述性统计、项目分析、相关分析、t 检验、探索性因素分析(EFA)和确认性因素分析(CFA)。结果显示,FPSES 具有令人满意的内部一致性信度(Cronbach's ?FPSES 还表现出良好的内容效度。此外,CFA 证实了所提出的二阶模型与样本数据之间的良好拟合,从而确保了建构效度。总之,FPSES 是一个具有良好心理测量学特性的评估工具,它为了解教师在为残疾大学生提供特殊教育服务时的观点、态度和实践提供了深入的信息。本文还为今后的研究和大学残疾服务办公室提供了建议。 收到:2024 年 3 月 29 日 / 已接受:发表日期:2024 年 5 月 5 日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Educational and Social Research
Journal of Educational and Social Research Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊最新文献
Translate the Literary Anthroponyms from Calvino’s Italian Folktales into Albanian Gender Equality at Public Universities in Saudi Arabia: Achievements and Ambitions The Forbidden Literature During the Soviet Union and Communist Albania, its Ethical Role, and Innovative Features: A Comparison of M. Bulgakov and K. Trebeshina Local Content Through Integrated Collaborative Learning: A Survey of Teaching Materials Needs Effects of Motion Infographics on High School Students’ Programming Skills
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1