Juridical Analysis of the Position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as a Cultural Heritage Area Linked to the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA)

M. G. Fernanda, Lego Karjoko, Hari Purwadi
{"title":"Juridical Analysis of the Position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as a Cultural Heritage Area Linked to the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA)","authors":"M. G. Fernanda, Lego Karjoko, Hari Purwadi","doi":"10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the provisions of the Fourth Dictum of the UUPA, regarding the position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as a cultural heritage area, there are still differences of opinion regarding its ownership status. This research aims to examine the position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace after the enactment of the UUPA, as well as to analyze the ownership status of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as a cultural heritage area. The research method is normative juridical. The type of data used is secondary data. Data analysis techniques using deductive reasoning presented descriptively. The results of this research are: first, the position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace after Indonesian Independence, based on: Law Number 10 of 1950 was designated as part of Central Java Province; and based on Law Number 18 of 1965, de jure Swaraja Surakarta was abolished. Then, after the UUPA came into force, the position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace should have shifted to the State. However, in reality, currently the Surakarta Palace Sultanate still has and exercises authority over the lands it owns and owns based on Presidential Decree Number 23 of 1988. Second, the ownership status of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as a cultural heritage area is stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Culture and Tourism Number PM.03/PW.007/MKP/2010 belongs to the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as an indigenous community in accordance with Article 13 of the Cultural Heritage Law. The Surakarta Kasunanan Palace is a traditional community, because the King is the traditional leader who still has the same territorial area and lineage and has authority within and outside his traditional area. If the Kasunanan Surakarta Palace is interpreted as a traditional institution, and ownership of the land of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace becomes a customary right for the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace, then as a consequence the Government in taking over the land of the former Surakarta self-government must also pay attention to the principle of recognizing these customary rights.","PeriodicalId":502776,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research","volume":"146 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i05-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the provisions of the Fourth Dictum of the UUPA, regarding the position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as a cultural heritage area, there are still differences of opinion regarding its ownership status. This research aims to examine the position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace after the enactment of the UUPA, as well as to analyze the ownership status of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as a cultural heritage area. The research method is normative juridical. The type of data used is secondary data. Data analysis techniques using deductive reasoning presented descriptively. The results of this research are: first, the position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace after Indonesian Independence, based on: Law Number 10 of 1950 was designated as part of Central Java Province; and based on Law Number 18 of 1965, de jure Swaraja Surakarta was abolished. Then, after the UUPA came into force, the position of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace should have shifted to the State. However, in reality, currently the Surakarta Palace Sultanate still has and exercises authority over the lands it owns and owns based on Presidential Decree Number 23 of 1988. Second, the ownership status of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as a cultural heritage area is stipulated in the Regulation of the Minister of Culture and Tourism Number PM.03/PW.007/MKP/2010 belongs to the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace as an indigenous community in accordance with Article 13 of the Cultural Heritage Law. The Surakarta Kasunanan Palace is a traditional community, because the King is the traditional leader who still has the same territorial area and lineage and has authority within and outside his traditional area. If the Kasunanan Surakarta Palace is interpreted as a traditional institution, and ownership of the land of the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace becomes a customary right for the Surakarta Kasunanan Palace, then as a consequence the Government in taking over the land of the former Surakarta self-government must also pay attention to the principle of recognizing these customary rights.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苏拉卡尔塔卡苏纳南宫作为文化遗产区的地位与《土地基本法》(UUPA)的法律分析
随着《统一世界文化遗产保护法》第四条关于苏拉卡尔塔-卡苏纳南宫作为文化遗产的地位的规定出台,关于其所有权地位的意见仍然存在分歧。本研究旨在考察苏腊卡尔塔-卡苏纳纳南王宫在《统一法》颁布后的地位,并分析苏腊卡尔塔-卡苏纳纳南王宫作为文化遗产区的所有权地位。研究方法为规范法学。使用的数据类型为二手数据。数据分析技术采用演绎推理的描述性方法。研究结果如下:第一,苏腊卡尔塔卡苏纳南宫在印尼独立后的地位:根据 1950 年第 10 号法律,苏腊卡尔塔被指定为中爪哇省的一部分;根据 1965 年第 18 号法律,苏腊卡尔塔在法律上被废除。因此,在《统一和平协议》生效后,苏腊卡尔塔卡苏纳南宫的地位本应移交给国家。但实际上,根据 1988 年第 23 号总统令,目前苏腊卡尔塔王宫苏丹国仍对其拥有和拥有的土地拥有并行使权力。其次,根据《文化遗产法》第 13 条的规定,文化和旅游部第 PM.03/PW.007/MKP/2010 号条例规定,苏拉卡尔塔卡苏纳南宫作为文化遗产区的所有权属于作为土著社区的苏拉卡尔塔卡苏纳南宫。苏拉卡尔塔卡苏纳南王宫是一个传统社区,因为国王是传统领袖,他仍然拥有相同的领土面积和血统,并在其传统区域内外拥有权力。如果将苏腊卡尔塔卡苏纳纳王宫解释为一个传统机构,苏腊卡尔塔卡苏纳纳王宫的土地所有权成为苏腊卡尔塔卡苏纳纳王宫的一项传统权利,那么政府在接管原苏腊卡尔塔自治政府的土地时也必须注意承认这些传统权利的原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethical Dilemmas of Nurses on Patient Autonomy in End-Of-Life Care in A Selected Tertiary Hospital in Nanyang City, China The Study of Foreign Direct Investment from Taiwan to Thailand Postpartum Lived Experiences of Emerging Adult Mothers: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study Exploring the Levels of Readiness in Assuming Filial Responsibility among Filipino Adults Two-Way Empowerment: The Role of Data Resources in Economic and Human Resource Development
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1