COMPARISON OF PLOT ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR DETERMINING EXCESSIVE WATER PRODUCTION MECHANISMS IN OIL WELLS

O.A. Chasovskikh, E.I. Prokhorov, K.A. Motorova
{"title":"COMPARISON OF PLOT ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR DETERMINING EXCESSIVE WATER PRODUCTION MECHANISMS IN OIL WELLS","authors":"O.A. Chasovskikh, E.I. Prokhorov, K.A. Motorova","doi":"10.17122/ngdelo-2024-2-107-119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Watering of production wells is an important factor leading to a decrease in production profitability and an increase in costs. There are several main mechanisms of excess water inflow. These are a leak in the production casing; a violation of contact between the production casing and the rock; a formation of a bottom water cone; a raising the WOC surface to the perforation interval; a breakthrough through a layer with high permeability. Mechanisms can complement each other, forming a complex integrated system. To identify them, there are three groups of diagnostic methods — geophysical research, hydrodynamic well testing and plot analytical studies. Each of these fundamentally different groups can be supplemented by field research. Specifically in this work, we considered the latter. The analysis is carried out using the example of wells in one of the deposits of an oil field of the Arkhangelsk region. In which the causes of unwanted water production have already been studied by other methods and can be considered known. The studied reservoir is massive, with carbonate hydrophobic rocks and the reserves of the entire field are predominantly concentrated in it (97 %); the oil field (in terms of reserves) is small. There are no injection wells, operation is carried out in a natural elastic water drive mode. In the article, in total, three plot analytical methods are analyzed, which are among the main ones and have different application algorithms. Both the physical principles of their application and their effectiveness in relation to specific oil field are considered. These are the methods of K. Chan; L.I. Merkulova and A.A. Ginzburg; R. Novotny. The first studies the dependence of the water-oil ratio and its derivative on time (WOR and WOR’(t)), is the most widely known and has a large number of modifications (however, here they are not considered in detail). The second is based on the study of the so-called «water-cut characteristics» (representing the dependence of the accumulated oil production vs accumulated liquid production during the water period of operation). It has more restrictions, but is also more comprehensive. The third is based on a comparison of the permeability properties of reservoirs that change during operation.","PeriodicalId":515328,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Engineering","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17122/ngdelo-2024-2-107-119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Watering of production wells is an important factor leading to a decrease in production profitability and an increase in costs. There are several main mechanisms of excess water inflow. These are a leak in the production casing; a violation of contact between the production casing and the rock; a formation of a bottom water cone; a raising the WOC surface to the perforation interval; a breakthrough through a layer with high permeability. Mechanisms can complement each other, forming a complex integrated system. To identify them, there are three groups of diagnostic methods — geophysical research, hydrodynamic well testing and plot analytical studies. Each of these fundamentally different groups can be supplemented by field research. Specifically in this work, we considered the latter. The analysis is carried out using the example of wells in one of the deposits of an oil field of the Arkhangelsk region. In which the causes of unwanted water production have already been studied by other methods and can be considered known. The studied reservoir is massive, with carbonate hydrophobic rocks and the reserves of the entire field are predominantly concentrated in it (97 %); the oil field (in terms of reserves) is small. There are no injection wells, operation is carried out in a natural elastic water drive mode. In the article, in total, three plot analytical methods are analyzed, which are among the main ones and have different application algorithms. Both the physical principles of their application and their effectiveness in relation to specific oil field are considered. These are the methods of K. Chan; L.I. Merkulova and A.A. Ginzburg; R. Novotny. The first studies the dependence of the water-oil ratio and its derivative on time (WOR and WOR’(t)), is the most widely known and has a large number of modifications (however, here they are not considered in detail). The second is based on the study of the so-called «water-cut characteristics» (representing the dependence of the accumulated oil production vs accumulated liquid production during the water period of operation). It has more restrictions, but is also more comprehensive. The third is based on a comparison of the permeability properties of reservoirs that change during operation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定油井过量产水机制的小区分析方法比较
生产井注水是导致生产利润下降和成本增加的一个重要因素。造成过量进水的机制主要有几种。这些机制包括:生产套管漏水;生产套管与岩石接触不良;形成底水锥;WOC 表面上升至射孔间隔;突破高渗透层。这些机制可以相互补充,形成一个复杂的综合系统。为了识别这些机制,有三类诊断方法--地球物理研究、水动力井测试和地层分析研究。这三组方法本质上各不相同,但都可以通过实地研究加以补充。在这项工作中,我们特别考虑了后者。我们以阿尔汉格尔斯克州一个油田的油井为例进行分析。在该油田中,我们已经通过其他方法研究了造成无用产水的原因,并认为这些原因是已知的。所研究的储油层为碳酸盐疏水岩,整个油田的储量主要集中在其中(97%);油田(就储量而言)规模较小。没有注水井,以自然弹性水驱模式运行。文章共分析了三种地块分析方法,它们属于主要方法,具有不同的应用算法。文章考虑了这些方法应用的物理原理以及与特定油田相关的有效性。这些是 K. Chan、L.I. Merkulova 和 A.A. Ginzburg、R. Novotny 的方法。第一种方法研究水油比及其导数对时间的依赖关系(WOR 和 WOR'(t)),是最广为人知的方法,并有大量的修改(但在此不做详细讨论)。第二种方法基于对所谓的 "水切特征 "的研究(表示在含水运行期间累积产油量与累积产液量之间的关系)。它有更多限制,但也更全面。第三种方法基于对运行期间发生变化的油藏渗透率特性的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DEVELOPMENT OF AN ALGORITHM FOR CALCULATING COMPONENT COMPOSITION TO IMPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT OF OFFSHORE OIL FIELDS IN THE NORTH CASPIAN BASIN INVESTIGATION OF STRUCTURAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF TUBING STEELS AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON THE USE OF SEDIMENTATION COMPOSITIONS DURING STEAM INJECTION ASSESSMENT OF STABILITY OF STEEL FRAMES OF INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS TO PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE ECONOMIC, ORGANIZATIONAL AND TECHNICAL PROBLEMS OF OIL AND GAS FIELD ABANDONMENT
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1