Do Investors Perceive Improvements in Fair Value Accounting for Investment Assets After PCAOB Inspections?

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1002/jcaf.22771
Carol Callaway Dee, Katherine Gunny, William R. Strawser
{"title":"Do Investors Perceive Improvements in Fair Value Accounting for Investment Assets After PCAOB Inspections?","authors":"Carol Callaway Dee,&nbsp;Katherine Gunny,&nbsp;William R. Strawser","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.22771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We examine whether fair value (FV) deficiencies highlighted in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspection reports improve perceptions of the reporting quality of FV investment assets. Qualitative studies illustrate that subjective and complex estimates pose unique challenges to audit improvement. Using a market-based measure of financial reporting quality (i.e., implied asset-specific betas), we find a positive association between the intensity of FV-deficient reports and perceived reporting quality of level 2 (but not level 3) FV investment assets and show that the association is stronger when audit office FV expertise is high. Consistent with improvements in disclosures, after a FV-deficient report, we find FV footnotes become relatively more readable and include less cautionary language as level 2 holdings increase. Overall, our evidence suggests investors value PCAOB inspections regarding level 2 FV assets.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":"36 3","pages":"49-69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine whether fair value (FV) deficiencies highlighted in Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspection reports improve perceptions of the reporting quality of FV investment assets. Qualitative studies illustrate that subjective and complex estimates pose unique challenges to audit improvement. Using a market-based measure of financial reporting quality (i.e., implied asset-specific betas), we find a positive association between the intensity of FV-deficient reports and perceived reporting quality of level 2 (but not level 3) FV investment assets and show that the association is stronger when audit office FV expertise is high. Consistent with improvements in disclosures, after a FV-deficient report, we find FV footnotes become relatively more readable and include less cautionary language as level 2 holdings increase. Overall, our evidence suggests investors value PCAOB inspections regarding level 2 FV assets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PCAOB检查后,投资者是否察觉到投资资产公允价值会计的改善?
我们研究了上市公司会计监督委员会(PCAOB)检查报告中突出的公允价值(FV)缺陷是否改善了对FV投资资产报告质量的看法。定性研究表明,主观和复杂的估计对审计改进提出了独特的挑战。使用基于市场的财务报告质量度量(即隐含的资产特定beta),我们发现FV缺陷报告的强度与二级(但不是三级)FV投资资产的感知报告质量之间存在正相关关系,并表明当审计办公室FV专业知识高时,这种关联更强。与披露的改进一致,在FV不足的报告之后,我们发现随着2级持有量的增加,FV脚注变得相对更可读,并且包含的警示性语言更少。总体而言,我们的证据表明投资者重视PCAOB对二级FV资产的检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Managerial Earnings Forecast Commitment, Investment Efficiency, and the Profitable Exercise of Firm Investment Opportunities Actuarial Objectivity: Why Pension Information Should be Carefully Scrutinized ESG in Survival Mode: Strategic Engagement During Recessions Buybacks and Bytes: Share Repurchases and Firm Value in the Software Industry
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1