Book Review: Benz, Arthur. 2024. Rethinking Multilevel Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q3 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada Pub Date : 2025-06-26 DOI:10.1111/capa.70022
Jörg Broschek
{"title":"Book Review: Benz, Arthur. 2024. Rethinking Multilevel Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar","authors":"Jörg Broschek","doi":"10.1111/capa.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Does multilevel governance still have any relevance for understanding our political world today? This question is the starting point that informs Arthur Benz's (<span>2024</span>) latest state-of-the-art monograph. It is an important and remarkable question to ask, considering that multilevel governance as a concept has become a real growth industry in political science since it emerged in the context of European integration in the early 1990s. Today, scholarship spans a broad spectrum of research areas like comparative federalism and regionalism (Benz, <span>2016</span>; Börzel &amp; Risse, <span>2016</span>; Hooghe &amp; Marks, <span>2016</span>), global governance (Zürn, <span>2010</span>, <span>2018</span>), municipal and regional governance (Conteh, <span>2020</span>; Tatham, <span>2021</span>), Indigenous-settler relations (Alcantara &amp; Nelles, <span>2014</span>; Breen &amp; Thomas, <span>2021</span>; Papillon, <span>2012</span>, <span>2015</span>) or European Integration (Hooghe &amp; Marks, <span>2003</span>; Kohler-Koch &amp; Rittberger, <span>2006</span>; Piattoni, <span>2009</span>, <span>2010</span>, for a general overview see Bache &amp; Flinders, <span>2004</span>; Benz et al., <span>2021</span>; Enderlein et al., <span>2010</span>).</p><p>Although these developments appear to point towards an erosion of multilevel governance, Benz argues the opposite, empirically and normatively. Despite significantly changing contextual conditions, multilevel governance has not become irrelevant. On the contrary, we have many reasons to critically reflect on how the concept can be applied in the current context, and how multilevel governance can still facilitate legitimate and effective policy-making. In his latest book, Benz offers convincing conceptual and theoretical innovations as to how scholarship needs to “rethink” multilevel governance after more than 30 years of research.</p>","PeriodicalId":46145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","volume":"68 2","pages":"330-337"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/capa.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Public Administration-Administration Publique Du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/capa.70022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does multilevel governance still have any relevance for understanding our political world today? This question is the starting point that informs Arthur Benz's (2024) latest state-of-the-art monograph. It is an important and remarkable question to ask, considering that multilevel governance as a concept has become a real growth industry in political science since it emerged in the context of European integration in the early 1990s. Today, scholarship spans a broad spectrum of research areas like comparative federalism and regionalism (Benz, 2016; Börzel & Risse, 2016; Hooghe & Marks, 2016), global governance (Zürn, 2010, 2018), municipal and regional governance (Conteh, 2020; Tatham, 2021), Indigenous-settler relations (Alcantara & Nelles, 2014; Breen & Thomas, 2021; Papillon, 2012, 2015) or European Integration (Hooghe & Marks, 2003; Kohler-Koch & Rittberger, 2006; Piattoni, 2009, 2010, for a general overview see Bache & Flinders, 2004; Benz et al., 2021; Enderlein et al., 2010).

Although these developments appear to point towards an erosion of multilevel governance, Benz argues the opposite, empirically and normatively. Despite significantly changing contextual conditions, multilevel governance has not become irrelevant. On the contrary, we have many reasons to critically reflect on how the concept can be applied in the current context, and how multilevel governance can still facilitate legitimate and effective policy-making. In his latest book, Benz offers convincing conceptual and theoretical innovations as to how scholarship needs to “rethink” multilevel governance after more than 30 years of research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:阿瑟·本茨,2024。重新思考多层次治理。切尔滕纳姆:爱德华·埃尔加
多层次治理对于理解当今的政治世界还有意义吗?这个问题是阿瑟·本茨(2024)最新的最先进的专著的出发点。考虑到自20世纪90年代初在欧洲一体化背景下出现以来,多层次治理作为一个概念已经成为政治学中一个真正的增长型产业,这是一个重要而值得注意的问题。今天,学术研究涵盖了广泛的研究领域,如比较联邦制和地区主义(Benz, 2016;Borzel,Risse, 2016;Hooghe,Marks, 2016),全球治理(z, 2010, 2018),城市和区域治理(Conteh, 2020;Tatham, 2021),土著定居者关系(Alcantara &;内尔,2014;布林,托马斯,2021;Papillon, 2012, 2015)或欧洲一体化(Hooghe &;标志,2003;Kohler-Koch,Rittberger, 2006;Piattoni, 2009, 2010,总体概述见Bache &;弗林德斯,2004;Benz et al., 2021;Enderlein et al., 2010)。尽管这些发展似乎指向多层治理的侵蚀,但本茨从经验和规范上提出了相反的观点。尽管上下文条件发生了重大变化,但多级治理并没有变得无关紧要。相反,我们有很多理由批判性地反思这个概念如何在当前背景下应用,以及多层次治理如何仍然可以促进合法和有效的决策。在他的最新著作中,奔驰提出了令人信服的概念和理论创新,即经过30多年的研究,学术界需要如何“重新思考”多层次治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Canadian Public Administration/Administration publique du Canada is the refereed scholarly publication of the Institute of Public Administration of Canada (IPAC). It covers executive, legislative, judicial and quasi-judicial functions at all three levels of Canadian government. Published quarterly, the journal focuses mainly on Canadian issues but also welcomes manuscripts which compare Canadian public sector institutions and practices with those in other countries or examine issues in other countries or international organizations which are of interest to the public administration community in Canada.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Using a “Disagreement Index” to Examine Cabinet Decision-Making Navigating Complex Processes and Relationships: Innovating in Uncertain Times “We've Got to Keep You Where You Are”: Rent Banks as Eviction Prevention Canadian Defence Procurement and the Project Approval Process
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1