Low-dose PD-1 inhibition in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Investigational New Drugs Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-21 DOI:10.1007/s10637-025-01565-0
Mobil Akhmedov, Pervin Zeynalova, Alexander Fedenko, Andrey Kaprin
{"title":"Low-dose PD-1 inhibition in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mobil Akhmedov, Pervin Zeynalova, Alexander Fedenko, Andrey Kaprin","doi":"10.1007/s10637-025-01565-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>No correlation between the dose, adverse events, and efficacy was detected in clinical trials of anti-PD-1 antibodies across a range of solid and hematological malignancies. Given that dose reduction with potentially comparable clinical efficacy may improve access to treatment, particularly in low-income regions, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (r/r) classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Relevant reports were identified through PUBMED, MEDLINE, Cochrane, ScienceDirect databases, and major international conference proceedings, from inception till December 1, 2024. The risk of bias was assessed independently by two authors using the Joanna Briggs's critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05; I<sup>2</sup> statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity. Random effects models (Der-Simonian method) was used to pool results from primary studies in the presence of significant heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening, 13 reports including 148 patients were included in the systematic review. After exclusion of duplicated reports, studies with less than 5 patients, and studies with unextractable data, five studies with a total of 84 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) with low-dose PD-1 inhibition in r/r cHL, as determined by meta-analysis, was 87% (95% CI, 71.9%-100%), with a corresponding complete response (CR) rate of 53.9% (95% CI, 34.7%-73.1%). The ORR with low-dose nivolumab was 83.8% (95% CI, 64.2%-100%), with a CR rate of 43.3% (95% CI, 29.7%-56.9%). The pooled rate of any-grade adverse events after low-dose PD-1 inhibition was 55.7% (95% CI, 36.1%-75.3%), with a grade 3-4 adverse event rate of 7.5% (95% CI, 1.7%-13.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated the high efficacy and acceptable toxicity of low-dose PD-1 inhibition in r/r cHL.</p>","PeriodicalId":14513,"journal":{"name":"Investigational New Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1013-1021"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigational New Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-025-01565-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: No correlation between the dose, adverse events, and efficacy was detected in clinical trials of anti-PD-1 antibodies across a range of solid and hematological malignancies. Given that dose reduction with potentially comparable clinical efficacy may improve access to treatment, particularly in low-income regions, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (r/r) classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).

Materials and methods: Relevant reports were identified through PUBMED, MEDLINE, Cochrane, ScienceDirect databases, and major international conference proceedings, from inception till December 1, 2024. The risk of bias was assessed independently by two authors using the Joanna Briggs's critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test, with statistical significance defined as p < 0.05; I2 statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity. Random effects models (Der-Simonian method) was used to pool results from primary studies in the presence of significant heterogeneity.

Results: After screening, 13 reports including 148 patients were included in the systematic review. After exclusion of duplicated reports, studies with less than 5 patients, and studies with unextractable data, five studies with a total of 84 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) with low-dose PD-1 inhibition in r/r cHL, as determined by meta-analysis, was 87% (95% CI, 71.9%-100%), with a corresponding complete response (CR) rate of 53.9% (95% CI, 34.7%-73.1%). The ORR with low-dose nivolumab was 83.8% (95% CI, 64.2%-100%), with a CR rate of 43.3% (95% CI, 29.7%-56.9%). The pooled rate of any-grade adverse events after low-dose PD-1 inhibition was 55.7% (95% CI, 36.1%-75.3%), with a grade 3-4 adverse event rate of 7.5% (95% CI, 1.7%-13.3%).

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated the high efficacy and acceptable toxicity of low-dose PD-1 inhibition in r/r cHL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低剂量PD-1抑制复发/难治性经典霍奇金淋巴瘤:系统回顾和荟萃分析
在一系列实体和血液系统恶性肿瘤的临床试验中,抗pd -1抗体的剂量、不良事件和疗效之间没有发现相关性。鉴于具有潜在可比临床疗效的剂量减少可能会改善治疗的可及性,特别是在低收入地区,我们进行了一项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估低剂量PD-1抑制剂单药治疗复发/难治性(r/r)经典霍奇金淋巴瘤(cHL)的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:通过PUBMED, MEDLINE, Cochrane, ScienceDirect数据库和主要国际会议记录,从成立到2024年12月1日,确定相关报告。两位作者使用乔安娜·布里格斯(Joanna Briggs)对报告流行数据的研究的关键评估清单,独立评估了偏倚风险。异质性采用Cochran’s Q检验,采用统计学显著性定义为p 2统计量来量化异质性。随机效应模型(Der-Simonian方法)用于汇集存在显著异质性的原始研究的结果。结果:经筛选,13篇报告148例纳入系统评价。在排除重复报告、少于5例患者的研究和数据不可提取的研究后,5项研究共84例患者被纳入meta分析。经荟萃分析确定,低剂量PD-1抑制r/r cHL的综合客观缓解率(ORR)为87% (95% CI, 71.9%-100%),相应的完全缓解率(CR)为53.9% (95% CI, 34.7%-73.1%)。低剂量纳武单抗的ORR为83.8% (95% CI, 64.2%-100%), CR率为43.3% (95% CI, 29.7%-56.9%)。低剂量PD-1抑制后,任何级别不良事件的总发生率为55.7% (95% CI, 36.1%-75.3%), 3-4级不良事件发生率为7.5% (95% CI, 1.7%-13.3%)。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,低剂量PD-1抑制r/r cHL的疗效高,毒性可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The development of new anticancer agents is one of the most rapidly changing aspects of cancer research. Investigational New Drugs provides a forum for the rapid dissemination of information on new anticancer agents. The papers published are of interest to the medical chemist, toxicologist, pharmacist, pharmacologist, biostatistician and clinical oncologist. Investigational New Drugs provides the fastest possible publication of new discoveries and results for the whole community of scientists developing anticancer agents.
期刊最新文献
Comparative efficacy of CLDN18.2-directed regimens in advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis of single-arm trials. Parthenolide enhances imatinib activity in gastrointestinal stromal tumor models through stress-associated apoptosis. First-in-human phase I study of DT-9081, a selective EP4 receptor antagonist, in advanced solid tumors. Influence of LGALS3 polymorphisms on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel: an exploratory biomarker analysis of the GENESECT study. Qishen Yiqi Dripping Pills ameliorate doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity: a study based on bioinformatics and experimental verification.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1