The updated network meta-analysis of the therapeutic efficacies of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Tzu Chi Medical Journal Pub Date : 2025-06-30 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_264_24
Chuan-Hsin Chang, Chih-Cheng Chien, Yue-Cune Chang
{"title":"The updated network meta-analysis of the therapeutic efficacies of lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chuan-Hsin Chang, Chih-Cheng Chien, Yue-Cune Chang","doi":"10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_264_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. We aim to investigate the most effective treatments for advanced/nonadvanced stages of lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched electronic databases to investigate the treatment efficacies of lung cancer. The network meta-analysis was used to identify the top five most effective therapeutic strategies. A total of 157 studies were collected with a cumulative total of 164,678 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that the best top five treatments: (1) for advanced lung cancer in response rate, were Chemo + Chemotherapy + Targeted Therapy, Cell therapy + Immunotherapy, Targeted Therapy + Radiotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy + Immunotherapy, and Chemotherapy + Chemoradiotherapy with cumulative probabilities 50.5, 49.6, 47.7, 46.0, and 45.6%; (2) for advanced lung cancer in progression-free survival (PFS) rate, were Targeted + Radiotherapy, Targeted + Others Therapy, Targeted + Targeted Therapy, Immu + Immu + Chemo Therapy, and Chemoradiotherapy with cumulative probabilities 99.5, 82.8, 44.9, 36.5, and 33.6%; (3) for nonadvanced lung cancer in response rate, were Chemoradiotherapy + Immu, Chemoradiotherapy + Targeted therapy, Chemoradiotherapy + Others, Chemotherapy + Surgery, and Radiotherapy + Others with cumulative probabilities 79.1, 74.9, 66.9, 60.4, and 54.2%; (4) for non-advanced lung cancer in PFS rate, were Chemo + Surgery, Chemoradiotherapy + Targeted, Surgery, Surgery + Radiotherapy, and Chemoradiotherapy + Others with cumulative probabilities 88.3, 86.1, 78.3, 73.1, and 50.8%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present the latest and most effective therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced or nonadvanced stages of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":45873,"journal":{"name":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","volume":"37 3","pages":"339-347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tzu Chi Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_264_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. We aim to investigate the most effective treatments for advanced/nonadvanced stages of lung cancer patients.

Materials and methods: We searched electronic databases to investigate the treatment efficacies of lung cancer. The network meta-analysis was used to identify the top five most effective therapeutic strategies. A total of 157 studies were collected with a cumulative total of 164,678 participants.

Results: The results showed that the best top five treatments: (1) for advanced lung cancer in response rate, were Chemo + Chemotherapy + Targeted Therapy, Cell therapy + Immunotherapy, Targeted Therapy + Radiotherapy, Chemoradiotherapy + Immunotherapy, and Chemotherapy + Chemoradiotherapy with cumulative probabilities 50.5, 49.6, 47.7, 46.0, and 45.6%; (2) for advanced lung cancer in progression-free survival (PFS) rate, were Targeted + Radiotherapy, Targeted + Others Therapy, Targeted + Targeted Therapy, Immu + Immu + Chemo Therapy, and Chemoradiotherapy with cumulative probabilities 99.5, 82.8, 44.9, 36.5, and 33.6%; (3) for nonadvanced lung cancer in response rate, were Chemoradiotherapy + Immu, Chemoradiotherapy + Targeted therapy, Chemoradiotherapy + Others, Chemotherapy + Surgery, and Radiotherapy + Others with cumulative probabilities 79.1, 74.9, 66.9, 60.4, and 54.2%; (4) for non-advanced lung cancer in PFS rate, were Chemo + Surgery, Chemoradiotherapy + Targeted, Surgery, Surgery + Radiotherapy, and Chemoradiotherapy + Others with cumulative probabilities 88.3, 86.1, 78.3, 73.1, and 50.8%.

Conclusion: We present the latest and most effective therapeutic strategies for patients with advanced or nonadvanced stages of lung cancer.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺癌治疗效果的最新网络荟萃分析:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:肺癌是世界上最常见的恶性肿瘤之一。我们旨在探讨晚期/非晚期肺癌患者最有效的治疗方法。材料与方法:检索电子数据库,研究肺癌的治疗效果。网络荟萃分析用于确定前五种最有效的治疗策略。总共收集了157项研究,累计有164,678名参与者。结果:结果显示:(1)晚期肺癌有效率前5位的治疗方案分别为化疗+化疗+靶向治疗、细胞治疗+免疫治疗、靶向治疗+放疗、放化疗+免疫治疗、化疗+放化疗,累计概率分别为50.5、49.6、47.7、46.0、45.6%;(2)对于晚期肺癌的无进展生存(PFS)率,分别为靶向+放疗、靶向+其他治疗、靶向+靶向治疗、免疫+免疫+化疗和放化疗,累积概率分别为99.5%、82.8、44.9%、36.5和33.6%;(3)非晚期肺癌的有效率依次为放化疗+免疫、放化疗+靶向治疗、放化疗+其他、化疗+手术、放疗+其他,累计概率分别为79.1、74.9、66.9、60.4、54.2%;(4)非晚期肺癌的PFS率依次为化疗+手术、放化疗+靶向、手术、手术+放疗、放化疗+其他,累计概率分别为88.3、86.1、78.3、73.1、50.8%。结论:我们为晚期或非晚期肺癌患者提供了最新和最有效的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tzu Chi Medical Journal
Tzu Chi Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Tzu Chi Medical Journal is the peer-reviewed publication of the Buddhist Compassion Relief Tzu Chi Foundation, and includes original research papers on clinical medicine and basic science, case reports, clinical pathological pages, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing self-care implementation and reducing marker detachment rates in cancer radiotherapy patients through diverse nursing care strategies. Cell culture platform fabrication methods and applications. Long noncoding RNA LOC441461 drives cancer growth and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Development of an enhanced sensitivity method for lateral flow immunoassays: An overview of strategies. Predictors of functional ability in autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1