Overview of current limitations and challenges in data and methods for assessing the health effects of sand and dust storms under the climate change scenario

IF 6.6 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.coesh.2025.100651
Aurelio Tobias , Massimo Stafoggia , Masahiro Hashizume , Xavier Querol
{"title":"Overview of current limitations and challenges in data and methods for assessing the health effects of sand and dust storms under the climate change scenario","authors":"Aurelio Tobias ,&nbsp;Massimo Stafoggia ,&nbsp;Masahiro Hashizume ,&nbsp;Xavier Querol","doi":"10.1016/j.coesh.2025.100651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sand and dust storms (SDS) present significant challenges in assessing their health effects, particularly as climate change may exacerbate desertification in some regions, potentially leading to more frequent and intense dust storms. This paper examines the current limitations and methodological issues in evaluating the health impacts of desert dust. While ecological time-series studies have effective in addressing the short-term health effects of air pollution, desert dust exposure introduces unique complexities to conventional methods. Key challenges include dust exposure metrics, exposure assessment methods, desert dust origin, and the type of impacted areas. The potential for increased dust storm activity in some regions, driven by climate change and desertification, underscores the need for more accurate exposure methods to assess the health effects of SDS. Addressing these limitations is essential to improving our understanding of the health risks posed by desert dust, particularly in the current context of a changing climate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52296,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100651"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468584425000601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sand and dust storms (SDS) present significant challenges in assessing their health effects, particularly as climate change may exacerbate desertification in some regions, potentially leading to more frequent and intense dust storms. This paper examines the current limitations and methodological issues in evaluating the health impacts of desert dust. While ecological time-series studies have effective in addressing the short-term health effects of air pollution, desert dust exposure introduces unique complexities to conventional methods. Key challenges include dust exposure metrics, exposure assessment methods, desert dust origin, and the type of impacted areas. The potential for increased dust storm activity in some regions, driven by climate change and desertification, underscores the need for more accurate exposure methods to assess the health effects of SDS. Addressing these limitations is essential to improving our understanding of the health risks posed by desert dust, particularly in the current context of a changing climate.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概述在气候变化情景下评估沙尘暴对健康影响的数据和方法目前的局限性和挑战
沙尘暴在评估其健康影响方面提出了重大挑战,特别是因为气候变化可能加剧某些地区的荒漠化,可能导致更频繁和更强烈的沙尘暴。本文审查了目前评估沙漠沙尘对健康影响的局限性和方法问题。虽然生态时序研究有效地解决了空气污染对健康的短期影响,但沙漠尘埃暴露给传统方法带来了独特的复杂性。主要挑战包括粉尘暴露度量、暴露评估方法、沙漠粉尘来源和受影响地区的类型。在气候变化和荒漠化的推动下,一些区域的沙尘暴活动可能增加,因此需要更准确的接触方法来评估SDS对健康的影响。解决这些限制对于提高我们对沙漠沙尘造成的健康风险的理解至关重要,特别是在当前气候变化的背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health
Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
114 days
期刊最新文献
Constructed wetlands for water reuse in the Mediterranean: Performance in relation to regulations Agrifood living labs as participatory and social innovation hubs: Co-creating sustainability policies and building socio-ecological systems resilience The impact of heat stress on global ruminant livestock production and potential adaptation and mitigation interventions Circular economy policy mixes: A call to combine lifecycle and multisectoral perspectives Life cycle assessment as a decision-support tool for end-of-waste determination in agri-food waste valorization
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1