Effect of Number of Days to Ambulation on Postoperative Daily Activities in Patients with Type A Aortic Dissection.

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10308
Yutaro Ohnishi, Tsubasa Yokote, Kengo Shirado, Shota Okuno, Kenta Kawamitsu, Kazuki Yamauchi, Takatoshi Nishimura, Masaya Tanaka, Takayuki Uchida, Shoji Kawakami
{"title":"Effect of Number of Days to Ambulation on Postoperative Daily Activities in Patients with Type A Aortic Dissection.","authors":"Yutaro Ohnishi, Tsubasa Yokote, Kengo Shirado, Shota Okuno, Kenta Kawamitsu, Kazuki Yamauchi, Takatoshi Nishimura, Masaya Tanaka, Takayuki Uchida, Shoji Kawakami","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of the number of days from surgery to ambulation on activities of daily living (ADL) at discharge in postoperative patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It included patients with a diagnosis of TAAD who were independent in ADL before the onset of symptoms. ADL was assessed using the Katz Index (KI), with a KI score of 6 points at discharge defining independence and less than 6 points classified as dependence. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on independence in ADL at discharge. Logistic regression analysis was performed with independence in ADL at discharge as the object variable and the number of days from surgery to ambulation as the explanatory variable. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to calculate the cutoff value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in the number of days to ambulation between the 2 groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the probability of being independent in ADL at discharge was significantly lower with more days to ambulation (odds ratio: 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.86-0.99, P < 0.035). The cutoff value for the number of days from surgery to ambulation for independence in ADL at discharge was 8 days (area under the curve: 0.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In postoperative patients with TAAD, the longer the postoperative days to start ambulation, the more difficult ADL recovery may be, but the cutoff values need further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"28 2","pages":"106-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effect of the number of days from surgery to ambulation on activities of daily living (ADL) at discharge in postoperative patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD).

Methods: It included patients with a diagnosis of TAAD who were independent in ADL before the onset of symptoms. ADL was assessed using the Katz Index (KI), with a KI score of 6 points at discharge defining independence and less than 6 points classified as dependence. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on independence in ADL at discharge. Logistic regression analysis was performed with independence in ADL at discharge as the object variable and the number of days from surgery to ambulation as the explanatory variable. A receiver operating characteristic curve was constructed to calculate the cutoff value.

Results: A total of 100 patients were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in the number of days to ambulation between the 2 groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the probability of being independent in ADL at discharge was significantly lower with more days to ambulation (odds ratio: 0.93, 95% confidence interval: 0.86-0.99, P < 0.035). The cutoff value for the number of days from surgery to ambulation for independence in ADL at discharge was 8 days (area under the curve: 0.64).

Conclusions: In postoperative patients with TAAD, the longer the postoperative days to start ambulation, the more difficult ADL recovery may be, but the cutoff values need further validation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下床天数对A型主动脉夹层患者术后日常活动的影响。
目的:本研究旨在探讨从手术到下床的天数对A型主动脉夹层(TAAD)术后患者出院时日常生活活动(ADL)的影响。方法:纳入确诊为TAAD且症状出现前ADL独立的患者。使用Katz指数(KI)评估ADL,出院时KI得分为6分为独立,低于6分为依赖。根据患者出院时ADL的独立性分为两组。以出院时ADL独立性为目标变量,手术至下床天数为解释变量,进行Logistic回归分析。构造了接收机工作特性曲线来计算截止值。结果:共纳入100例患者。两组患儿行走天数差异有统计学意义。多元logistic回归分析显示,出院时ADL独立的概率随行走天数的增加而显著降低(优势比:0.93,95%可信区间:0.86 ~ 0.99,P < 0.035)。从手术到ADL出院时独立活动的天数的截止值为8天(曲线下面积:0.64)。结论:TAAD术后患者,术后开始活动时间越长,ADL恢复难度越大,但临界值有待进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Risk Factors for Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Disorders and Proposed Prevention Strategies. Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation on Hemodynamics Compared to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation. Recovery of Physical Function in a Patient with Intensive Care Unit-acquired Weakness after Valvular Surgery: A Case Report. Predictive Sub-items and Cutoff Scores of the Functional Assessment for Control of Trunk (FACT) for Gait Independence in Patients with Acute Stroke. Is There a Difference in Factors Affecting Rest Pain and Pain Intensity during Movement at 1 Year Post-total Knee Arthroplasty?
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1