The Belt and Road Initiative and Emerging US-China Rivalries in Africa: The Case of the Lobito Corridor

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Policy Pub Date : 2025-07-10 DOI:10.1111/1758-5899.70055
Maria Adele Carrai
{"title":"The Belt and Road Initiative and Emerging US-China Rivalries in Africa: The Case of the Lobito Corridor","authors":"Maria Adele Carrai","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Within a geopolitical landscape often framed as a nascent cold war between the United States and China, China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is increasingly pivoting towards the Global South, especially Africa and Latin America. This shift comes amid an increase in new competitive infrastructural initiatives, such as the US-led G7 coalition's Partnership for Global Investments and Infrastructures. This article explores the transformations of the BRI and what was its nascent rival under Biden administration, with a particular focus on the Lobito Corridor, which Trump seems to be supporting too for mineral access. It examines the motivations and strategies of the United States, China, and beneficiary nations, and how dynamics between them may unfold. The study finds that the Lobito Corridor exemplifies how the United States was re-entering African infrastructure markets, challenging China's dominance by targeting critical supply chains. The conclusion posits that this corridor signaled a strategic shift in global infrastructure competition, with the United States leveraging it to reassert influence in Africa, potentially recalibrating China's dominance in critical mineral supply chains.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"16 4","pages":"739-750"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within a geopolitical landscape often framed as a nascent cold war between the United States and China, China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is increasingly pivoting towards the Global South, especially Africa and Latin America. This shift comes amid an increase in new competitive infrastructural initiatives, such as the US-led G7 coalition's Partnership for Global Investments and Infrastructures. This article explores the transformations of the BRI and what was its nascent rival under Biden administration, with a particular focus on the Lobito Corridor, which Trump seems to be supporting too for mineral access. It examines the motivations and strategies of the United States, China, and beneficiary nations, and how dynamics between them may unfold. The study finds that the Lobito Corridor exemplifies how the United States was re-entering African infrastructure markets, challenging China's dominance by targeting critical supply chains. The conclusion posits that this corridor signaled a strategic shift in global infrastructure competition, with the United States leveraging it to reassert influence in Africa, potentially recalibrating China's dominance in critical mineral supply chains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一带一路”倡议与非洲新兴的美中对抗:以洛比托走廊为例
在中美之间的地缘政治格局中,中国的“一带一路”倡议(BRI)越来越多地转向全球南方,特别是非洲和拉丁美洲。这一转变正值新的竞争性基础设施计划增加之际,比如以美国为首的七国集团(G7)联盟的全球投资和基础设施伙伴关系(Partnership for Global Investments and infrastructure)。本文探讨了“一带一路”倡议的转变及其在拜登政府执政期间的新生竞争对手,特别关注洛比托走廊,特朗普似乎也支持该走廊获得矿产资源。它考察了美国、中国和受益国的动机和战略,以及它们之间的动态如何展开。研究发现,洛比托走廊体现了美国如何重新进入非洲基础设施市场,通过瞄准关键供应链挑战中国的主导地位。结论认为,这条走廊标志着全球基础设施竞争的战略转变,美国利用它来重申在非洲的影响力,可能会重新调整中国在关键矿产供应链中的主导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Status Politics: The Changing Meanings and Practices of South Korea's Middle Power Diplomacy Australia and the Path Not Taken: The Declining Independence and Influence of Middle Powers Layered Incoherence in Middle Power Foreign Policy: Indonesia and the U.S.-China Rivalry Norwegian Blues? Rethinking the Idea of Middle Powers in an Era of Fuzzy Bifurcation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1