Alexander Blackrie's proposed comparison of two treatments for the 'gravel and stone' (1763): A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial?

IF 0.3 4区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Journal of Medical Biography Pub Date : 2025-11-06 DOI:10.1177/09677720251392411
Max Cooper, Sarah Cooper
{"title":"Alexander Blackrie's proposed comparison of two treatments for the 'gravel and stone' (1763): A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial?","authors":"Max Cooper, Sarah Cooper","doi":"10.1177/09677720251392411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alexander Blackrie (bap. 1702, d. 1772) was a Scottish Surgeon-Apothecary who attended Aberdeen's grammar school and Marischal College. He served as surgeon-general in India and practised at Bromley, Kent, England. In later life, he suffered from the 'gravel and stone' i.e., urological stones. This triggered an enquiry into the lucrative medication of Dr Chittick of Bath. Blackrie deduced it to be nothing more than soap-lye (Sodium hydroxide) and went on to formulate his own version ('Blackrie's lixivium'). Blackrie undertook comparative experiments on the efficacy of these two products at dissolving equally-sized fragments of the same urinary stone. In 1763, he published his proposal to compare the two products in patients. This called for: selection of patients 'afflicted in the same degree', randomisation by 'dividing them equally by lot', the 'experiment' to be 'repeated' and the number of participations to be 'large'. Although never implemented, Blackrie's proposal is an early model of a randomised controlled trial and may be the first description of a non-inferiority trial. His use of the term 'decisive' experiment and reference to James Jurin FRS may offer a link with Hauksbee the Younger's 1743 proposed 'experimentum crucis'. Blackrie's contribution to the development of fair comparisons of treatments deserves greater recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":16217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Biography","volume":" ","pages":"9677720251392411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Biography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09677720251392411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alexander Blackrie (bap. 1702, d. 1772) was a Scottish Surgeon-Apothecary who attended Aberdeen's grammar school and Marischal College. He served as surgeon-general in India and practised at Bromley, Kent, England. In later life, he suffered from the 'gravel and stone' i.e., urological stones. This triggered an enquiry into the lucrative medication of Dr Chittick of Bath. Blackrie deduced it to be nothing more than soap-lye (Sodium hydroxide) and went on to formulate his own version ('Blackrie's lixivium'). Blackrie undertook comparative experiments on the efficacy of these two products at dissolving equally-sized fragments of the same urinary stone. In 1763, he published his proposal to compare the two products in patients. This called for: selection of patients 'afflicted in the same degree', randomisation by 'dividing them equally by lot', the 'experiment' to be 'repeated' and the number of participations to be 'large'. Although never implemented, Blackrie's proposal is an early model of a randomised controlled trial and may be the first description of a non-inferiority trial. His use of the term 'decisive' experiment and reference to James Jurin FRS may offer a link with Hauksbee the Younger's 1743 proposed 'experimentum crucis'. Blackrie's contribution to the development of fair comparisons of treatments deserves greater recognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚历山大·布莱克里(Alexander Blackrie)提出的“砾石和石头”两种处理方法的比较(1763):一项随机对照非劣效性试验?
亚历山大·布莱克利(bap)1702年(1772年),苏格兰外科医生,曾就读于阿伯丁文法学校和马里斯查尔学院。他曾在印度担任卫生局局长,并在英国肯特郡的布罗姆利执业。在后来的生活中,他遭受了“砾石和石头”,即泌尿结石。这引发了对巴斯的奇蒂克医生利润丰厚的药物的调查。Blackrie推断它只不过是肥皂碱(氢氧化钠),并继续配制他自己的版本(“Blackrie's lixivium”)。Blackrie对这两种产品在溶解相同大小的尿结石碎片方面的功效进行了比较实验。1763年,他发表了比较两种产品在患者中的应用的建议。这要求:选择“受相同程度折磨”的患者,通过“抽签将他们平均划分”进行随机化,“实验”要“重复”,参与的人数要“大”。尽管Blackrie的建议从未付诸实施,但它是随机对照试验的早期模型,可能是对非劣效性试验的首次描述。他对“决定性”实验一词的使用以及对James Jurin FRS的参考可能与Hauksbee the Younger在1743年提出的“experimentum crucis”有联系。Blackrie对公平比较治疗方法的贡献值得更多的认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Biography
Journal of Medical Biography HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: This international quarterly publication focuses on the lives of people in or associated with medicine, those considered legendary as well as the less well known. The journal includes much original research about figures from history and their afflictions, thus providing an interesting, fresh and new perspective which can lead to greater understanding of each subject. Journal of Medical Biography is a fascinating and compelling read, providing an insight into the origins of modern medicine and the characters and personalities that made it what it is today.
期刊最新文献
'For a wager a hundred yards': Sir John Floyer's controlled trial of the effect of cold water upon athleticism (1702). 'The Choice of Places to dwell in': Lord Bacon's controlled experiments on 'putrefaction' and 'the Disposition of the Aire' (pre-1626). 'A Defence of Physick': Thomas Reeve's proposed 'fair experiment' on the benefits of tar-water treatment (1744). The medical education of James McCune Smith (1813-1865). Lorenzo Martini (1785-1844): A versatile scientific personality and his contribution to the history of hygiene.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1