Durjoy D. Dhruba MS , Sawyer Goetz MD , Otavio Ferreira Dalla Pria MD , Thomas Reith MD , Abigail Reutzel MD , Pritish Y. Aher MD , Prashant Nagpal MD , Sarv Priya Dr, MD
{"title":"Deep Learning-Based Cardiac MRI Planning from Localizers to Cine Views Using Landmark Detection","authors":"Durjoy D. Dhruba MS , Sawyer Goetz MD , Otavio Ferreira Dalla Pria MD , Thomas Reith MD , Abigail Reutzel MD , Pritish Y. Aher MD , Prashant Nagpal MD , Sarv Priya Dr, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.11.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>This study evaluates a fully automated deep learning framework to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of cardiac MRI planning.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective study, data from 1023 patients (ages 8–90 years) who underwent cardiac MRI were analyzed, including coronal, sagittal, axial localizers, and short-axis (SAX) and long-axis cine images. Experts manually annotated landmarks, serving as the ground truth for developing deep learning models. The models were assessed using 5-fold cross-validation. Performance metrics included median landmark distances and plane angle differences.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The model achieved robust performance in landmark localization across all cardiac MRI planes. For localizer images, median distances were 5.1 mm (superior) and 7.2 mm (inferior) on coronal views, and 5.6 mm (superior) and 7.5 mm (inferior) on sagittal views. Median distances for axial, 2-chamber, and 4-chamber landmarks were 5.2 mm, 5.2 mm, and 5.6 mm, respectively. In short-axis mid slices, annotations based on the left ventricular center, right ventricular insertion points, and right ventricle obtuse angle had a median error of 5.2 mm, while basal slice valve-based annotations had 4.6 mm error. Angular deviations for SAX planning were 2.0° (2CH) and 1.5° (4CH). For long-axis views, angulation errors were lower using SAX mid slices (3.3° for 2CH, 2.6° for 4CH) compared to SAX base (4.0° and 3.9°, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A deep learning-based automated workflow for cardiac MRI planning is feasible with improved precision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 3","pages":"Pages 924-935"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225010827","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives
This study evaluates a fully automated deep learning framework to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of cardiac MRI planning.
Materials and Methods
In this retrospective study, data from 1023 patients (ages 8–90 years) who underwent cardiac MRI were analyzed, including coronal, sagittal, axial localizers, and short-axis (SAX) and long-axis cine images. Experts manually annotated landmarks, serving as the ground truth for developing deep learning models. The models were assessed using 5-fold cross-validation. Performance metrics included median landmark distances and plane angle differences.
Results
The model achieved robust performance in landmark localization across all cardiac MRI planes. For localizer images, median distances were 5.1 mm (superior) and 7.2 mm (inferior) on coronal views, and 5.6 mm (superior) and 7.5 mm (inferior) on sagittal views. Median distances for axial, 2-chamber, and 4-chamber landmarks were 5.2 mm, 5.2 mm, and 5.6 mm, respectively. In short-axis mid slices, annotations based on the left ventricular center, right ventricular insertion points, and right ventricle obtuse angle had a median error of 5.2 mm, while basal slice valve-based annotations had 4.6 mm error. Angular deviations for SAX planning were 2.0° (2CH) and 1.5° (4CH). For long-axis views, angulation errors were lower using SAX mid slices (3.3° for 2CH, 2.6° for 4CH) compared to SAX base (4.0° and 3.9°, respectively).
Conclusion
A deep learning-based automated workflow for cardiac MRI planning is feasible with improved precision.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.