Efficiency of Mental Health Services With Robustness Check of DEA Scores by Income Groups

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Managerial and Decision Economics Pub Date : 2025-11-08 DOI:10.1002/mde.70043
Gülnur İlgün
{"title":"Efficiency of Mental Health Services With Robustness Check of DEA Scores by Income Groups","authors":"Gülnur İlgün","doi":"10.1002/mde.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The aim of this study is to examine the efficiency of mental health services in different countries based on their economic levels (income groups) and to see how reliable the results are. It also aims to examine whether the efficiency scores of countries vary by region and income groups. Data from 75 countries were used in the analysis. Input factors were the number of mental hospitals, psychiatrists, psychologists, and nurses, while output variables included the prevalence of depression, anxiety, total years lived with disability (YLD) for depression, and YLD for anxiety. To ensure that the decision-making units in this study are homogeneous, countries were separated into three groups based on their income levels, and then the data envelopment analysis (DEA) (input-oriented VRS model) was performed individually for each income level. When comparing middle-income countries (MIC) to low-income countries (LIC) and high-income countries (HIC), I found that MIC has lower efficiency scores (0.48). In addition, I found that LIC (0.93) is more efficient than HIC (0.72). This analysis identifies countries' potential improvement gaps in improving the efficiency of mental health services. The findings of this study are intended to guide policymakers and decision-makers in the field of mental health treatment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18186,"journal":{"name":"Managerial and Decision Economics","volume":"47 2","pages":"403-410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial and Decision Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mde.70043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the efficiency of mental health services in different countries based on their economic levels (income groups) and to see how reliable the results are. It also aims to examine whether the efficiency scores of countries vary by region and income groups. Data from 75 countries were used in the analysis. Input factors were the number of mental hospitals, psychiatrists, psychologists, and nurses, while output variables included the prevalence of depression, anxiety, total years lived with disability (YLD) for depression, and YLD for anxiety. To ensure that the decision-making units in this study are homogeneous, countries were separated into three groups based on their income levels, and then the data envelopment analysis (DEA) (input-oriented VRS model) was performed individually for each income level. When comparing middle-income countries (MIC) to low-income countries (LIC) and high-income countries (HIC), I found that MIC has lower efficiency scores (0.48). In addition, I found that LIC (0.93) is more efficient than HIC (0.72). This analysis identifies countries' potential improvement gaps in improving the efficiency of mental health services. The findings of this study are intended to guide policymakers and decision-makers in the field of mental health treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同收入群体心理健康服务效率的稳健性检验
这项研究的目的是根据不同国家的经济水平(收入群体)来检验心理健康服务的效率,并看看结果有多可靠。它还旨在检查各国的效率得分是否因地区和收入群体而异。来自75个国家的数据被用于分析。输入因素是精神病院、精神病医生、心理学家和护士的数量,而输出变量包括抑郁、焦虑的患病率、抑郁的残疾总生活年数(YLD)和焦虑的残疾总生活年数。为保证本研究决策单位的同质性,将各国按收入水平分成三组,并对每个收入水平分别进行数据包络分析(DEA)(投入导向VRS模型)。当将中等收入国家(MIC)与低收入国家(LIC)和高收入国家(HIC)进行比较时,我发现MIC的效率得分较低(0.48)。此外,我发现LIC(0.93)比HIC(0.72)更有效。这一分析确定了各国在提高精神卫生服务效率方面的潜在改进差距。本研究结果旨在指导心理健康治疗领域的政策制定者和决策者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
242
期刊介绍: Managerial and Decision Economics will publish articles applying economic reasoning to managerial decision-making and management strategy.Management strategy concerns practical decisions that managers face about how to compete, how to succeed, and how to organize to achieve their goals. Economic thinking and analysis provides a critical foundation for strategic decision-making across a variety of dimensions. For example, economic insights may help in determining which activities to outsource and which to perfom internally. They can help unravel questions regarding what drives performance differences among firms and what allows these differences to persist. They can contribute to an appreciation of how industries, organizations, and capabilities evolve.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Delegation of Non-Core Tasks and Market Expansion Putting Wind in the Sails: The Impact of Data Factor Market Development on Firm Internationalization Hometown Folks in the Right Places: Political Connections and Corporate ESG The Impact of ESG Rating Disagreement on Corporate Philanthropy
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1