Marc Vila, Meritxell Mondejar, Sergio Cazorla-Calderón, Àngels Ballarin, Sandra Casas-Recasens, Rosa Faner, Alvar Agustí
{"title":"COPD Management in Primary Care: Underutilisation of Nursing Consultations.","authors":"Marc Vila, Meritxell Mondejar, Sergio Cazorla-Calderón, Àngels Ballarin, Sandra Casas-Recasens, Rosa Faner, Alvar Agustí","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the clinical profile, comorbidity burden, follow-up and healthcare utilisation in patients labelled as having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Primary Care (PC) nursing consultations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Real-world data COPD, retrospective, observational study using routinely collected data in electronic health records (EHR). This study adheres to the STROBE reporting guidelines for cross-sectional studies.</p><p><strong>Location: </strong>Three Primary Care centres in Catalonia, Spain, belong to the Catalan Health Service.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients aged ≥ 15 years with a recorded diagnosis of COPD in their EHR, excluding institutionalised individuals and those deceased before study onset. Final sample: 474 patients (105 women, 369 men; mean age 70 years) from a reference population of 28,000 individuals.</p><p><strong>Main measurements: </strong>Data included socio-demographics, smoking/alcohol, mMRC dyspnea, inhaled therapy/adherence, spirometry, comorbidities, Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA), active COPD care plans and 12-month healthcare use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EHR showed a high rate of missing data in follow-up variables (inhaler adherence 28.5%; dyspnea 17%-20%). Despite that, all participants were 'labelled' as COPD, most of them lacked spirometric confirmation. Active smoking was highly prevalent (52.3% women, 45.0% men). Hypertension, obesity and osteoarthritis were the most common comorbidities; anxiety, depression, osteoporosis and thyroid disorders were more frequent in women. Higher GMA complexity correlated with more Primary Care visits, especially nursing consultations, particularly in patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes (p < 0.001) for 12 months follow-up. No significant differences between groups were found in urgent or hospital care use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHR-labelled COPD patients with cardiometabolic comorbidity received more structured nursing follow-up and more annual visits than without. Improving EHR recording, integrating spirometry with the EHR, and prioritising high-complexity profiles could enhance monitoring, treatment optimisation and equity-nursing consultations are a key lever.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patients or members of the public were directly engaged in the study design or data analysis. Nevertheless, the research was motivated by patient needs and aims to improve healthcare services.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"2744-2754"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13156530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70241","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical profile, comorbidity burden, follow-up and healthcare utilisation in patients labelled as having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Primary Care (PC) nursing consultations.
Design: Real-world data COPD, retrospective, observational study using routinely collected data in electronic health records (EHR). This study adheres to the STROBE reporting guidelines for cross-sectional studies.
Location: Three Primary Care centres in Catalonia, Spain, belong to the Catalan Health Service.
Participants: All patients aged ≥ 15 years with a recorded diagnosis of COPD in their EHR, excluding institutionalised individuals and those deceased before study onset. Final sample: 474 patients (105 women, 369 men; mean age 70 years) from a reference population of 28,000 individuals.
Main measurements: Data included socio-demographics, smoking/alcohol, mMRC dyspnea, inhaled therapy/adherence, spirometry, comorbidities, Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA), active COPD care plans and 12-month healthcare use.
Results: EHR showed a high rate of missing data in follow-up variables (inhaler adherence 28.5%; dyspnea 17%-20%). Despite that, all participants were 'labelled' as COPD, most of them lacked spirometric confirmation. Active smoking was highly prevalent (52.3% women, 45.0% men). Hypertension, obesity and osteoarthritis were the most common comorbidities; anxiety, depression, osteoporosis and thyroid disorders were more frequent in women. Higher GMA complexity correlated with more Primary Care visits, especially nursing consultations, particularly in patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes (p < 0.001) for 12 months follow-up. No significant differences between groups were found in urgent or hospital care use.
Conclusions: EHR-labelled COPD patients with cardiometabolic comorbidity received more structured nursing follow-up and more annual visits than without. Improving EHR recording, integrating spirometry with the EHR, and prioritising high-complexity profiles could enhance monitoring, treatment optimisation and equity-nursing consultations are a key lever.
Patient or public contribution: No patients or members of the public were directly engaged in the study design or data analysis. Nevertheless, the research was motivated by patient needs and aims to improve healthcare services.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.