COPD Management in Primary Care: Underutilisation of Nursing Consultations.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Clinical Nursing Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1111/jocn.70241
Marc Vila, Meritxell Mondejar, Sergio Cazorla-Calderón, Àngels Ballarin, Sandra Casas-Recasens, Rosa Faner, Alvar Agustí
{"title":"COPD Management in Primary Care: Underutilisation of Nursing Consultations.","authors":"Marc Vila, Meritxell Mondejar, Sergio Cazorla-Calderón, Àngels Ballarin, Sandra Casas-Recasens, Rosa Faner, Alvar Agustí","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the clinical profile, comorbidity burden, follow-up and healthcare utilisation in patients labelled as having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Primary Care (PC) nursing consultations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Real-world data COPD, retrospective, observational study using routinely collected data in electronic health records (EHR). This study adheres to the STROBE reporting guidelines for cross-sectional studies.</p><p><strong>Location: </strong>Three Primary Care centres in Catalonia, Spain, belong to the Catalan Health Service.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients aged ≥ 15 years with a recorded diagnosis of COPD in their EHR, excluding institutionalised individuals and those deceased before study onset. Final sample: 474 patients (105 women, 369 men; mean age 70 years) from a reference population of 28,000 individuals.</p><p><strong>Main measurements: </strong>Data included socio-demographics, smoking/alcohol, mMRC dyspnea, inhaled therapy/adherence, spirometry, comorbidities, Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA), active COPD care plans and 12-month healthcare use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EHR showed a high rate of missing data in follow-up variables (inhaler adherence 28.5%; dyspnea 17%-20%). Despite that, all participants were 'labelled' as COPD, most of them lacked spirometric confirmation. Active smoking was highly prevalent (52.3% women, 45.0% men). Hypertension, obesity and osteoarthritis were the most common comorbidities; anxiety, depression, osteoporosis and thyroid disorders were more frequent in women. Higher GMA complexity correlated with more Primary Care visits, especially nursing consultations, particularly in patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes (p < 0.001) for 12 months follow-up. No significant differences between groups were found in urgent or hospital care use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EHR-labelled COPD patients with cardiometabolic comorbidity received more structured nursing follow-up and more annual visits than without. Improving EHR recording, integrating spirometry with the EHR, and prioritising high-complexity profiles could enhance monitoring, treatment optimisation and equity-nursing consultations are a key lever.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patients or members of the public were directly engaged in the study design or data analysis. Nevertheless, the research was motivated by patient needs and aims to improve healthcare services.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"2744-2754"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13156530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70241","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical profile, comorbidity burden, follow-up and healthcare utilisation in patients labelled as having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Primary Care (PC) nursing consultations.

Design: Real-world data COPD, retrospective, observational study using routinely collected data in electronic health records (EHR). This study adheres to the STROBE reporting guidelines for cross-sectional studies.

Location: Three Primary Care centres in Catalonia, Spain, belong to the Catalan Health Service.

Participants: All patients aged ≥ 15 years with a recorded diagnosis of COPD in their EHR, excluding institutionalised individuals and those deceased before study onset. Final sample: 474 patients (105 women, 369 men; mean age 70 years) from a reference population of 28,000 individuals.

Main measurements: Data included socio-demographics, smoking/alcohol, mMRC dyspnea, inhaled therapy/adherence, spirometry, comorbidities, Adjusted Morbidity Groups (GMA), active COPD care plans and 12-month healthcare use.

Results: EHR showed a high rate of missing data in follow-up variables (inhaler adherence 28.5%; dyspnea 17%-20%). Despite that, all participants were 'labelled' as COPD, most of them lacked spirometric confirmation. Active smoking was highly prevalent (52.3% women, 45.0% men). Hypertension, obesity and osteoarthritis were the most common comorbidities; anxiety, depression, osteoporosis and thyroid disorders were more frequent in women. Higher GMA complexity correlated with more Primary Care visits, especially nursing consultations, particularly in patients with cardiovascular disease and diabetes (p < 0.001) for 12 months follow-up. No significant differences between groups were found in urgent or hospital care use.

Conclusions: EHR-labelled COPD patients with cardiometabolic comorbidity received more structured nursing follow-up and more annual visits than without. Improving EHR recording, integrating spirometry with the EHR, and prioritising high-complexity profiles could enhance monitoring, treatment optimisation and equity-nursing consultations are a key lever.

Patient or public contribution: No patients or members of the public were directly engaged in the study design or data analysis. Nevertheless, the research was motivated by patient needs and aims to improve healthcare services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健中的慢性阻塞性肺病管理:护理咨询的利用不足。
目的:描述在初级保健(PC)护理咨询中被标记为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者的临床概况、合并症负担、随访和医疗保健利用。设计:真实世界数据COPD,回顾性观察性研究,使用电子健康记录(EHR)中常规收集的数据。本研究遵循STROBE横断面研究报告指南。地点:西班牙加泰罗尼亚的三个初级保健中心隶属于加泰罗尼亚卫生局。参与者:所有年龄≥15岁且在电子病历中有COPD诊断记录的患者,不包括住院患者和研究开始前死亡的患者。最终样本:474名患者(105名女性,369名男性,平均年龄70岁)来自参考人群28,000人。主要测量:数据包括社会人口统计学、吸烟/酒精、mMRC呼吸困难、吸入治疗/依从性、肺活量测定、合并症、调整发病率组(GMA)、积极的COPD护理计划和12个月的医疗保健使用情况。结果:电子病历显示随访变量的数据缺失率很高(吸入器依从性28.5%;呼吸困难17%-20%)。尽管如此,所有参与者都被“标记”为慢性阻塞性肺病,其中大多数人缺乏肺量测定证实。主动吸烟非常普遍(女性占52.3%,男性占45.0%)。高血压、肥胖和骨关节炎是最常见的合并症;焦虑、抑郁、骨质疏松和甲状腺疾病在女性中更为常见。较高的GMA复杂性与更多的初级保健就诊相关,特别是心血管疾病和糖尿病患者的护理咨询(p)。结论:ehr标记的合并心血管代谢合并症的COPD患者比没有ehr标记的COPD患者接受了更多的结构化护理随访和更多的年度就诊。改进电子病历记录,将肺活量测定法与电子病历相结合,并优先考虑高复杂性的情况,可以加强监测,优化治疗和公平护理咨询是一个关键杠杆。患者或公众贡献:没有患者或公众直接参与研究设计或数据分析。然而,这项研究的动机是患者的需求,旨在改善医疗保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
期刊最新文献
Comment on: Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Practice With Decubitus Risk Prediction Alerts: A Pilot Process Evaluation. Enhancing Clinical Reliability in Automated Pressure Injury Measurement: Challenges and Future Directions. Machine Learning in Discharge Planning for Stroke Patients: A Review of Feature Representation and Aggregation Strategies With Suggestions for Improvement. From Screens to Support: Re-Engineering Cancer Nursing Practice With Telemedicine. Comment on 'Surrogates' Decisional Conflict and Needs Regarding Invasive Procedures for Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Mixed-Methods Study'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1