Effects of Radiation Therapy on the Incidence of Bladder Cancer and Rectal Cancer in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Nested Case-Control Study in Korean Population.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 ANDROLOGY World Journal of Mens Health Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-15 DOI:10.5534/wjmh.250298
Jongkyou Kwon, Jinhyung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Soyoung Jeon, Sungun Bang, Kwang Suk Lee, Kyo Chul Koo, Kang Su Cho, Do Kyung Kim
{"title":"Effects of Radiation Therapy on the Incidence of Bladder Cancer and Rectal Cancer in Patients with Prostate Cancer: A Nationwide Nested Case-Control Study in Korean Population.","authors":"Jongkyou Kwon, Jinhyung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Soyoung Jeon, Sungun Bang, Kwang Suk Lee, Kyo Chul Koo, Kang Su Cho, Do Kyung Kim","doi":"10.5534/wjmh.250298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the risk of secondary bladder and colorectal cancers following radiotherapy for prostate cancer using a nationwide nested case-control design based on Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment database.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide nested case-control study using database, including men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2011 and 2020. Patients were classified into radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups and matched 1:1 based on age, comorbidity index, and follow-up duration. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between radiotherapy and secondary bladder and colorectal cancer incidences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the crude cohort, radiotherapy was not significantly associated with secondary bladder or colorectal cancer. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in the cumulative incidence between radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups. However, nested case-control analysis revealed a significantly increased risk of secondary bladder cancer in the radiotherapy group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.86), while no association was found for colorectal cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radiotherapy was linked to an increased bladder cancer risk but not colorectal cancer risk, underscoring the need for targeted long-term surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":54261,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Mens Health","volume":" ","pages":"1086-1096"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Mens Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5534/wjmh.250298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the risk of secondary bladder and colorectal cancers following radiotherapy for prostate cancer using a nationwide nested case-control design based on Korea's Health Insurance Review and Assessment database.

Materials and methods: We conducted a nationwide nested case-control study using database, including men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2011 and 2020. Patients were classified into radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups and matched 1:1 based on age, comorbidity index, and follow-up duration. Conditional logistic regression was used to assess the association between radiotherapy and secondary bladder and colorectal cancer incidences.

Results: In the crude cohort, radiotherapy was not significantly associated with secondary bladder or colorectal cancer. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in the cumulative incidence between radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups. However, nested case-control analysis revealed a significantly increased risk of secondary bladder cancer in the radiotherapy group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.86), while no association was found for colorectal cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.27).

Conclusions: Radiotherapy was linked to an increased bladder cancer risk but not colorectal cancer risk, underscoring the need for targeted long-term surveillance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射治疗对前列腺癌患者膀胱癌和直肠癌发病率的影响:韩国人口的全国巢式病例对照研究
目的:本研究旨在评估前列腺癌放疗后继发膀胱癌和结直肠癌的风险,采用基于韩国健康保险审查和评估数据库的全国巢式病例对照设计。材料和方法:我们使用数据库进行了一项全国性的巢式病例对照研究,包括2011年至2020年间新诊断为前列腺癌的男性。根据患者年龄、合并症指数、随访时间,将患者分为放疗组和非放疗组,1:1匹配。使用条件logistic回归来评估放疗与继发性膀胱癌和结直肠癌发病率之间的关系。结果:在粗队列中,放疗与继发性膀胱癌或结直肠癌无显著相关性。Kaplan-Meier分析显示放疗组和非放疗组的累积发病率无显著差异。然而,巢式病例对照分析显示,放疗组继发性膀胱癌的风险显著增加(校正风险比为1.38,95%可信区间为1.02 ~ 1.86),而与结直肠癌的风险无相关性(校正风险比为0.96,95%可信区间为0.72 ~ 1.27)。结论:放疗与膀胱癌风险增加有关,但与结直肠癌风险无关,强调有针对性的长期监测的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Mens Health
World Journal of Mens Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Coenzyme Q10 in Idiopathic Male Infertility: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. Enhancing Statistical Competence in Andrology: Outcomes of an Online Medical Statistics Training Program. Efficacy of Prunella vulgaris on Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Comparative Trends in the Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in South Korea and the United States of America (USA) Based on Korean National Health Insurance Data. Sexual Orientation Disparities in Mental Health Vulnerabilities: Exploring Body Image Dissatisfaction and Desired Changes in Physical Attributes among Cisgender Heterosexual, Homosexual, and Bisexual Men in Taiwan.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1