Recovery patterns and influencing factors of temporary threshold shifts in occupational noise-exposed workers

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Research Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1016/j.heares.2026.109578
Jing Qian , Minghui Xiao , Jijun Guo , Danyan Cao , Xuehua Wu , Xiufeng Lu , Linyan Shu , Hairu Yang , Taihua Long , Aichu Yang
{"title":"Recovery patterns and influencing factors of temporary threshold shifts in occupational noise-exposed workers","authors":"Jing Qian ,&nbsp;Minghui Xiao ,&nbsp;Jijun Guo ,&nbsp;Danyan Cao ,&nbsp;Xuehua Wu ,&nbsp;Xiufeng Lu ,&nbsp;Linyan Shu ,&nbsp;Hairu Yang ,&nbsp;Taihua Long ,&nbsp;Aichu Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2026.109578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Noise-induced hearing loss represents a significant global occupational health issue. Understanding the recovery patterns of temporary threshold shift (TTS) is crucial for early intervention. This longitudinal study enrolled 140 occupational noise-exposed workers and conducted serial audiological assessments over one week to characterize multi-frequency TTS recovery trajectories and explore influencing factors. The results showed that the highest prevalence of TTS occurred at 6 kHz (81.4%), followed by 4 kHz (72.1%). Recovery was frequency-dependent: low-frequency hearing thresholds (0.5-1 kHz) returned to baseline within 72.2 h in more than 85% of participants, while recovery at high frequencies (4-6 kHz) was comparatively slower. Longer occupational noise exposure (&gt;10 years), male, and higher noise level (≥85 dB(A)) were each associated with delayed recovery. Notably, although more than 80% of participants showed substantial hearing recovery within 72.2 h, complete recovery across all frequencies required up to one week, this suggests that the current mandated 48-h pre-audiometry rest period may be insufficient to assess full auditory recovery. We recommend extending this rest period to 72 h, with a follow-up confirmatory test one week after exposure, to provide a more evidence-based approach for occupational hearing protection protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"473 ","pages":"Article 109578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595526000547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Noise-induced hearing loss represents a significant global occupational health issue. Understanding the recovery patterns of temporary threshold shift (TTS) is crucial for early intervention. This longitudinal study enrolled 140 occupational noise-exposed workers and conducted serial audiological assessments over one week to characterize multi-frequency TTS recovery trajectories and explore influencing factors. The results showed that the highest prevalence of TTS occurred at 6 kHz (81.4%), followed by 4 kHz (72.1%). Recovery was frequency-dependent: low-frequency hearing thresholds (0.5-1 kHz) returned to baseline within 72.2 h in more than 85% of participants, while recovery at high frequencies (4-6 kHz) was comparatively slower. Longer occupational noise exposure (>10 years), male, and higher noise level (≥85 dB(A)) were each associated with delayed recovery. Notably, although more than 80% of participants showed substantial hearing recovery within 72.2 h, complete recovery across all frequencies required up to one week, this suggests that the current mandated 48-h pre-audiometry rest period may be insufficient to assess full auditory recovery. We recommend extending this rest period to 72 h, with a follow-up confirmatory test one week after exposure, to provide a more evidence-based approach for occupational hearing protection protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业性噪声暴露工人临时阈值转移的恢复模式及影响因素。
噪音引起的听力损失是一个重大的全球职业健康问题。了解暂时性阈值移位(TTS)的恢复模式对早期干预至关重要。本研究招募了140名职业性噪音暴露工人,并在一周内进行了一系列听力学评估,以表征多频TTS恢复轨迹并探讨影响因素。结果显示,6 kHz人群TTS患病率最高(81.4%),4 kHz人群次之(72.1%)。恢复与频率有关:85%以上的参与者在72.2小时内低频听力阈值(0.5-1 kHz)恢复到基线,而高频听力阈值(4-6 kHz)恢复相对较慢。较长的职业噪声暴露时间(10年)、男性和较高的噪声水平(≥85 dB(A))均与延迟恢复有关。值得注意的是,尽管超过80%的参与者在72.2小时内表现出明显的听力恢复,但所有频率的完全恢复需要长达一周的时间,这表明目前规定的48小时测听前休息时间可能不足以评估听力的完全恢复。我们建议将休息时间延长至72小时,并在暴露后一周进行随访确认性测试,以便为职业听力保护方案提供更循证的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Research
Hearing Research 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
163
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles. Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.
期刊最新文献
Neuritin protects spiral ganglion neurons via NKA–Ca²⁺ homeostasis and CaMKII/MAPK suppression Training of pitch contour perception: Influence of pitch processing abilities and multisensory interactions Restoring auditory discrimination in noise: mismatch negativity evidence for a deep neural network-based denoising system in hearing aids A method to record drilling noise during skull surgery for the development of noise-reducing assistance systems Cross-comparison of anesthetic regimens for auditory brainstem response recordings in rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1