Jing Qian , Minghui Xiao , Jijun Guo , Danyan Cao , Xuehua Wu , Xiufeng Lu , Linyan Shu , Hairu Yang , Taihua Long , Aichu Yang
{"title":"Recovery patterns and influencing factors of temporary threshold shifts in occupational noise-exposed workers","authors":"Jing Qian , Minghui Xiao , Jijun Guo , Danyan Cao , Xuehua Wu , Xiufeng Lu , Linyan Shu , Hairu Yang , Taihua Long , Aichu Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2026.109578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Noise-induced hearing loss represents a significant global occupational health issue. Understanding the recovery patterns of temporary threshold shift (TTS) is crucial for early intervention. This longitudinal study enrolled 140 occupational noise-exposed workers and conducted serial audiological assessments over one week to characterize multi-frequency TTS recovery trajectories and explore influencing factors. The results showed that the highest prevalence of TTS occurred at 6 kHz (81.4%), followed by 4 kHz (72.1%). Recovery was frequency-dependent: low-frequency hearing thresholds (0.5-1 kHz) returned to baseline within 72.2 h in more than 85% of participants, while recovery at high frequencies (4-6 kHz) was comparatively slower. Longer occupational noise exposure (>10 years), male, and higher noise level (≥85 dB(A)) were each associated with delayed recovery. Notably, although more than 80% of participants showed substantial hearing recovery within 72.2 h, complete recovery across all frequencies required up to one week, this suggests that the current mandated 48-h pre-audiometry rest period may be insufficient to assess full auditory recovery. We recommend extending this rest period to 72 h, with a follow-up confirmatory test one week after exposure, to provide a more evidence-based approach for occupational hearing protection protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"473 ","pages":"Article 109578"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595526000547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Noise-induced hearing loss represents a significant global occupational health issue. Understanding the recovery patterns of temporary threshold shift (TTS) is crucial for early intervention. This longitudinal study enrolled 140 occupational noise-exposed workers and conducted serial audiological assessments over one week to characterize multi-frequency TTS recovery trajectories and explore influencing factors. The results showed that the highest prevalence of TTS occurred at 6 kHz (81.4%), followed by 4 kHz (72.1%). Recovery was frequency-dependent: low-frequency hearing thresholds (0.5-1 kHz) returned to baseline within 72.2 h in more than 85% of participants, while recovery at high frequencies (4-6 kHz) was comparatively slower. Longer occupational noise exposure (>10 years), male, and higher noise level (≥85 dB(A)) were each associated with delayed recovery. Notably, although more than 80% of participants showed substantial hearing recovery within 72.2 h, complete recovery across all frequencies required up to one week, this suggests that the current mandated 48-h pre-audiometry rest period may be insufficient to assess full auditory recovery. We recommend extending this rest period to 72 h, with a follow-up confirmatory test one week after exposure, to provide a more evidence-based approach for occupational hearing protection protocols.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.