No evidence for genotype-treatment interactions with breast cancer endocrine therapy adverse effects in UK Biobank.

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY NPJ Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2026-02-26 DOI:10.1038/s41523-026-00923-2
Kinan Mokbel, Michael N Weedon, Victoria Moye, Katherine S Ruth, Leigh Jackson
{"title":"No evidence for genotype-treatment interactions with breast cancer endocrine therapy adverse effects in UK Biobank.","authors":"Kinan Mokbel, Michael N Weedon, Victoria Moye, Katherine S Ruth, Leigh Jackson","doi":"10.1038/s41523-026-00923-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Earlier studies have demonstrated that breast cancer patients with particular genomic variants are more susceptible to adverse drug effects (ADEs) when they are receiving endocrine therapy. However, to establish a robust body of evidence with regard to the potential utility and predictive value of these variants, findings from these reports require replication. This study aimed to validate previously reported associations between genomic variants and medically important adverse drug effects (MIADEs) using UK Biobank (UKBB). In 2729 female participants who had received endocrine therapy in the UKBB, no statistically significant genotype-treatment interactions were observed for the outcomes examined after correction for multiple testing. Power was limited for modest interactions involving low-frequency variants and less frequent outcomes, whereas power was high to detect larger interaction effects in common-variant scenarios. Accordingly, the findings do not provide robust evidence to support previously reported pharmacogenomic associations in this dataset, and current evidence does not support the use of pharmacogenomic testing for individualised endocrine therapy selection in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19247,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-026-00923-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Earlier studies have demonstrated that breast cancer patients with particular genomic variants are more susceptible to adverse drug effects (ADEs) when they are receiving endocrine therapy. However, to establish a robust body of evidence with regard to the potential utility and predictive value of these variants, findings from these reports require replication. This study aimed to validate previously reported associations between genomic variants and medically important adverse drug effects (MIADEs) using UK Biobank (UKBB). In 2729 female participants who had received endocrine therapy in the UKBB, no statistically significant genotype-treatment interactions were observed for the outcomes examined after correction for multiple testing. Power was limited for modest interactions involving low-frequency variants and less frequent outcomes, whereas power was high to detect larger interaction effects in common-variant scenarios. Accordingly, the findings do not provide robust evidence to support previously reported pharmacogenomic associations in this dataset, and current evidence does not support the use of pharmacogenomic testing for individualised endocrine therapy selection in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在英国生物银行中,没有证据表明基因型治疗与乳腺癌内分泌治疗不良反应的相互作用。
乳腺癌是世界上最常见的癌症。早期的研究表明,具有特定基因组变异的乳腺癌患者在接受内分泌治疗时更容易发生药物不良反应(ADEs)。然而,为了建立关于这些变异的潜在效用和预测价值的有力证据,这些报告的发现需要复制。本研究旨在利用UK Biobank (UKBB)验证先前报道的基因组变异与医学上重要的药物不良反应(MIADEs)之间的关联。在UKBB接受内分泌治疗的2729名女性参与者中,经多重检测校正后,未观察到基因型-治疗相互作用的统计学意义。涉及低频变量和较少频率结果的适度交互作用的功率有限,而在常见变量场景中检测更大的交互作用的功率很高。因此,研究结果并没有提供强有力的证据来支持该数据集中先前报道的药物基因组学关联,并且目前的证据也不支持在临床实践中使用药物基因组学检测来选择个体化内分泌治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NPJ Breast Cancer
NPJ Breast Cancer Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Breast Cancer publishes original research articles, reviews, brief correspondence, meeting reports, editorial summaries and hypothesis generating observations which could be unexplained or preliminary findings from experiments, novel ideas, or the framing of new questions that need to be solved. Featured topics of the journal include imaging, immunotherapy, molecular classification of disease, mechanism-based therapies largely targeting signal transduction pathways, carcinogenesis including hereditary susceptibility and molecular epidemiology, survivorship issues including long-term toxicities of treatment and secondary neoplasm occurrence, the biophysics of cancer, mechanisms of metastasis and their perturbation, and studies of the tumor microenvironment.
期刊最新文献
Enabling DCIS subtyping: leveraging foundation models for robust grading and molecular biomarker scoring. Co-occurring rare germline DNA repair gene variants in BRCA1/BRCA2 implicated hereditary breast cancer families. Imlunestrant with or without abemaciclib in advanced breast cancer: safety analyses from the EMBER-3 trial. Multimodal analysis of a rare BARD1 missense variant suggests its pathogenicity is conditional. Development and internal validation of mammography feature-based prognostic models for distant recurrence-free survival of invasive breast cancer in a screening cohort.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1