How learners think and act in simulations: A multi-study analysis

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Education Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ijme.2026.101374
Thuy Dung Pham Thi , Nam Tien Duong
{"title":"How learners think and act in simulations: A multi-study analysis","authors":"Thuy Dung Pham Thi ,&nbsp;Nam Tien Duong","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2026.101374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study adopts a multi-study approach to explore how sociotechnical interactions and motivational factors influence learner behavior in simulation-based learning environments. Grounded in sociomateriality theory and inspiration theory, the research investigates the effects of system-to-individual (Sys2Ind) and peer-to-individual (Peer2Ind) interactions on cognitive engagement, strategic intention, impulse decision-making, and cross-scenario learning. Study 1 involved qualitative interviews to identify key interaction and motivation dimensions, while Study 2 employed a large-scale survey (N = 384), analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results show that both Sys2Ind and Peer2Ind significantly enhance cognitive engagement, which in turn drives strategic intention. Strategic intention predicts both impulse decisions and cross-scenario learning. Furthermore, learning goal orientation positively moderates these effects, strengthening the influence of strategic intention. The findings offer theoretical advancements in simulation-based learning and provide actionable guidance for designing engaging and adaptive learning systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"24 2","pages":"Article 101374"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811726000182","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study adopts a multi-study approach to explore how sociotechnical interactions and motivational factors influence learner behavior in simulation-based learning environments. Grounded in sociomateriality theory and inspiration theory, the research investigates the effects of system-to-individual (Sys2Ind) and peer-to-individual (Peer2Ind) interactions on cognitive engagement, strategic intention, impulse decision-making, and cross-scenario learning. Study 1 involved qualitative interviews to identify key interaction and motivation dimensions, while Study 2 employed a large-scale survey (N = 384), analyzed using PLS-SEM. The results show that both Sys2Ind and Peer2Ind significantly enhance cognitive engagement, which in turn drives strategic intention. Strategic intention predicts both impulse decisions and cross-scenario learning. Furthermore, learning goal orientation positively moderates these effects, strengthening the influence of strategic intention. The findings offer theoretical advancements in simulation-based learning and provide actionable guidance for designing engaging and adaptive learning systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习者如何在模拟中思考和行动:一项多研究分析
本研究采用多元研究的方法,探讨社会技术互动和动机因素如何影响基于模拟的学习环境中的学习者行为。本研究以社会物质性理论和激励理论为基础,探讨了系统对个人(Sys2Ind)和同伴对个人(Peer2Ind)互动对认知参与、战略意图、冲动决策和跨场景学习的影响。研究1采用定性访谈来确定关键的互动和动机维度,而研究2采用大规模调查(N = 384),使用PLS-SEM进行分析。结果表明,Sys2Ind和Peer2Ind都显著增强了认知参与,认知参与反过来又推动了战略意图。战略意图预测冲动决策和跨情景学习。学习目标取向正向调节了这些效应,强化了策略意图的影响。这些发现为基于模拟的学习提供了理论上的进步,并为设计具有吸引力和适应性的学习系统提供了可操作的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
From information evaluation to technology use: Generative AI adoption in Chinese business schools Value co-creation in AI-influenced management education: Gamification as a relational mechanism Drivers and barriers to metaverse adoption in education: An integrated behavioral reasoning and innovation resistance perspective Cultural scripts and the curricular positioning of business ethics in management education: A cross-national analysis Agile Essence Improvement Model for assessing business education and enhancing employability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1