The Individualistic Drift of French Law: Desire and Normative Claims for New Subjective Rights in the "French Surrogacy Market".

Gaëlle Deharo
{"title":"The Individualistic Drift of French Law: Desire and Normative Claims for New Subjective Rights in the \"French Surrogacy Market\".","authors":"Gaëlle Deharo","doi":"10.1163/15718093-bja10156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Could the emergence of a surrogacy market in France, despite its prohibition by the French Civil Code, be the tip of a social iceberg? This article aims to analyse the individualization of Law and society. Through innovative legal constructs, the possessors of rights provided by national Law are demanding changes to the law to suit their individual interests. By anchoring their desire in an existing subjective right, legal subjects situate the fulfillment of this desire within the legal domain, while raising the question of its normative dimension. Beyond traditional questions of legal agility, optimization and discursive dimension of the use of available rights, the consequences are crucial: because individualization is growing, the law is no longer a collective and social phenomenon, but a tool that the judge adjusts according to the desired result. What is at stake here is the meaning of Law, Justice and, ultimately, society itself.</p>","PeriodicalId":43934,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","volume":" ","pages":"247-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Could the emergence of a surrogacy market in France, despite its prohibition by the French Civil Code, be the tip of a social iceberg? This article aims to analyse the individualization of Law and society. Through innovative legal constructs, the possessors of rights provided by national Law are demanding changes to the law to suit their individual interests. By anchoring their desire in an existing subjective right, legal subjects situate the fulfillment of this desire within the legal domain, while raising the question of its normative dimension. Beyond traditional questions of legal agility, optimization and discursive dimension of the use of available rights, the consequences are crucial: because individualization is growing, the law is no longer a collective and social phenomenon, but a tool that the judge adjusts according to the desired result. What is at stake here is the meaning of Law, Justice and, ultimately, society itself.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国法律的个人主义倾向:“法国代孕市场”中对新主体性权利的欲望与规范性要求。
尽管《法国民法典》禁止代孕,但在法国出现的代孕市场是否只是社会问题的冰山一角?本文旨在分析法律与社会的个体化。通过创新法律结构,国内法规定的权利所有人要求修改法律以适应其个人利益。通过将他们的愿望锚定在现有的主观权利中,法律主体将这种愿望的实现置于法律领域内,同时提出了其规范性维度的问题。除了法律灵活性、优化和使用现有权利的话语维度等传统问题之外,其后果是至关重要的:由于个性化正在增长,法律不再是一种集体和社会现象,而是法官根据预期结果进行调整的工具。这里利害攸关的是法律、正义的意义,最终是社会本身的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Jewish Studies (EJJS) is the Journal of the European Association for Jewish Studies (EAJS). Its main purpose is to publish high-quality research articles, essays and shorter contributions on all aspects of Jewish Studies. Submissions are all double blind peer-reviewed. Additionally, EJJS seeks to inform its readers on current developments in Jewish Studies: it carries comprehensive review-essays on specific topics, trends and debated questions, as well as regular book-reviews. A further section carries reports on conferences, symposia, and descriptions of research projects in every area of Jewish Studies.
期刊最新文献
Wastewater Surveillance for Public Health: Updated EU Regulatory Framework. The Directiveness of Advance Directives. Performing Euthanasia on Individuals with Severe Dementia. Governance of AI and Participatory Involvement of "Lived Experiences". European Court of Human Rights. Privacy-Enhancing Technologies and Privacy-By-Design for Medical AI.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1