Negative pressure wound therapy made simple: expert panel recommendations.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Journal of wound care Pub Date : 2026-04-02 DOI:10.12968/jowc.2025.0149
Mark Portou, Kris Bernaerts, Franco Bassetto, Mario Cherubino, Mark Collier, Christoph Hirche, Raymund E Horch, Julian W Mall, Gillian O' Brien, Alberto Piaggesi, Claire Porter, Sebastian Probst, S Tawqeer Rashid, Sadhana Trivedi
{"title":"Negative pressure wound therapy made simple: expert panel recommendations.","authors":"Mark Portou, Kris Bernaerts, Franco Bassetto, Mario Cherubino, Mark Collier, Christoph Hirche, Raymund E Horch, Julian W Mall, Gillian O' Brien, Alberto Piaggesi, Claire Porter, Sebastian Probst, S Tawqeer Rashid, Sadhana Trivedi","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2025.0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Wound management poses a substantial economic burden, and the prevalence of hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds is a growing health concern. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), with and without instillation, is an adjunctive therapy commonly used to manage acute and hard-to-heal wounds and has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes. The variety of NPWT modalities, patient needs, wound characteristics and care requirements can make selecting the optimal system challenging, leading to uncertainty and inconsistent practices among new users, increasing the risk of suboptimal outcomes. This article provides practical guidance to help new NPWT users make confident, evidence-based decisions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An expert panel was convened in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in November 2023 to review published treatment guidelines and the current literature and to develop simplified recommendations on the use of NPWT in hospital and community care settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expert panel members discussed published wound management evidence and their real-world experiences as wound management specialists to generate recommendations for healthcare professionals to aid them in the selection of NPWT modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This summary presents nine expert panel recommendations, including simplified risk assessment algorithms and guidance to improve NPWT use across clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"35 4","pages":"292-298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2025.0149","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Wound management poses a substantial economic burden, and the prevalence of hard-to-heal (chronic) wounds is a growing health concern. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), with and without instillation, is an adjunctive therapy commonly used to manage acute and hard-to-heal wounds and has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes. The variety of NPWT modalities, patient needs, wound characteristics and care requirements can make selecting the optimal system challenging, leading to uncertainty and inconsistent practices among new users, increasing the risk of suboptimal outcomes. This article provides practical guidance to help new NPWT users make confident, evidence-based decisions.

Method: An expert panel was convened in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, in November 2023 to review published treatment guidelines and the current literature and to develop simplified recommendations on the use of NPWT in hospital and community care settings.

Results: Expert panel members discussed published wound management evidence and their real-world experiences as wound management specialists to generate recommendations for healthcare professionals to aid them in the selection of NPWT modalities.

Conclusion: This summary presents nine expert panel recommendations, including simplified risk assessment algorithms and guidance to improve NPWT use across clinical settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负压伤口治疗简单:专家小组建议。
目的:伤口管理造成了巨大的经济负担,难以愈合(慢性)伤口的流行是一个日益严重的健康问题。负压伤口治疗(NPWT),有或没有灌注,是一种辅助治疗,通常用于治疗急性和难以愈合的伤口,并已证明了积极的临床结果。NPWT模式、患者需求、伤口特征和护理要求的多样性使得选择最佳系统具有挑战性,导致新用户的不确定性和不一致的实践,增加了次优结果的风险。本文提供了实用的指导,帮助新的NPWT用户做出自信的、基于证据的决策。方法:于2023年11月在荷兰阿姆斯特丹召集了一个专家小组,审查已发表的治疗指南和当前文献,并制定关于在医院和社区护理环境中使用NPWT的简化建议。结果:专家小组成员讨论了已发表的伤口管理证据和他们作为伤口管理专家的实际经验,为医疗保健专业人员提供建议,以帮助他们选择NPWT模式。结论:本总结提出了九项专家小组建议,包括简化风险评估算法和指导,以改善临床环境中NPWT的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
期刊最新文献
Exudate management with a next-generation multilayered foam dressing in traumatic and surgical wounds: a prospective, multicentre study. Financial and occupational burden of leg ulcers in an active Portuguese tertiary hospital population: absenteeism, unemployment and retirement. Effectiveness of silicone superabsorbent polymer dressings for chronic wound management: a prospective single-arm clinical study. Comparison between foam dressings impregnated with ionic silver and silver sulfadiazine cream 1% in treating deep burns. Defining appropriate CAMPs administration: a response to the Medicare wastage guidance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1