A Cross-National Comparison of Sexual Aggression Perpetration Among College Students in the United States and Colombia.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Sex Research Pub Date : 2026-04-10 DOI:10.1080/00224499.2026.2653033
Allison P Mazur,Zoë D Peterson,Mónica Pérez-Trujillo,Ana Lucia Jaramillo-Sierra
{"title":"A Cross-National Comparison of Sexual Aggression Perpetration Among College Students in the United States and Colombia.","authors":"Allison P Mazur,Zoë D Peterson,Mónica Pérez-Trujillo,Ana Lucia Jaramillo-Sierra","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2026.2653033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sexual aggression is a global issue, yet few studies have used a single instrument to draw comparisons of sexual aggression perpetration rates across nations. This study assessed self-reported rates of sexual aggression perpetration using the Sexual Initiation Strategies Scale (SISS) and compared rates between college students in the United States (U.S.) and Colombia. The SISS separates sexual aggression strategies into three categories: enticement, coercion, and assault. Logistic regression analyses revealed significant country by gender interaction effects for enticement and coercion strategies. Follow-up analyses revealed Colombian men endorsed significantly higher rates of enticement and coercion strategies than U.S. men and Colombian women, suggesting that country norms may play a role in the perpetration of sexual aggression for men. U.S. men and women did not significantly differ in their endorsement of enticement and coercion strategies, consistent with some other recent research suggesting that young, U.S. women are using low-level sexual aggression at similar rates as men. Significant main effects of country and gender were found for assault strategies, with higher rates reported in Colombia than in the U.S. and among men than women. Results highlight both differences and similarities in sexual aggression among college students in Colombia and the U.S. and suggest that cultural messages regarding gender roles might be important influences on rates of sexual aggression.","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2026.2653033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual aggression is a global issue, yet few studies have used a single instrument to draw comparisons of sexual aggression perpetration rates across nations. This study assessed self-reported rates of sexual aggression perpetration using the Sexual Initiation Strategies Scale (SISS) and compared rates between college students in the United States (U.S.) and Colombia. The SISS separates sexual aggression strategies into three categories: enticement, coercion, and assault. Logistic regression analyses revealed significant country by gender interaction effects for enticement and coercion strategies. Follow-up analyses revealed Colombian men endorsed significantly higher rates of enticement and coercion strategies than U.S. men and Colombian women, suggesting that country norms may play a role in the perpetration of sexual aggression for men. U.S. men and women did not significantly differ in their endorsement of enticement and coercion strategies, consistent with some other recent research suggesting that young, U.S. women are using low-level sexual aggression at similar rates as men. Significant main effects of country and gender were found for assault strategies, with higher rates reported in Colombia than in the U.S. and among men than women. Results highlight both differences and similarities in sexual aggression among college students in Colombia and the U.S. and suggest that cultural messages regarding gender roles might be important influences on rates of sexual aggression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国与哥伦比亚大学生性侵犯犯罪的跨国比较。
性侵犯是一个全球性的问题,然而很少有研究使用单一的工具来比较各国的性侵犯发生率。本研究使用性启动策略量表(SISS)评估了自我报告的性侵犯行为发生率,并比较了美国和哥伦比亚大学生的性侵犯发生率。SISS将性侵犯策略分为三类:引诱、胁迫和攻击。Logistic回归分析显示,国家性别互动对引诱和胁迫策略的影响显著。后续分析显示,哥伦比亚男性比美国男性和哥伦比亚女性更支持引诱和胁迫策略,这表明国家规范可能在男性性侵犯的实施中起作用。美国男性和女性在支持引诱和胁迫策略方面没有显著差异,这与最近其他一些研究一致,这些研究表明,美国年轻女性使用低级别性侵犯的比例与男性相似。研究发现,国家和性别对性侵策略有显著的主要影响,哥伦比亚的性侵率高于美国,男性的性侵率高于女性。研究结果强调了哥伦比亚和美国大学生在性侵犯方面的异同,并表明性别角色的文化信息可能是性侵犯发生率的重要影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
期刊最新文献
Saying It, Showing It, and Just Going with It: Examining Individual and Situational Correlates of Sexual Consent Communication Among College Students. Any Port in a Storm? Assessment of the Effects of Type and Brand of Condom in Safe-Sex Practices Through a Field Experiment in an Hostal in Lima. Understanding Sexual Orientation Ambiguity: Perceptions of Transitional Impacts in the Context of a Relationship Dissolution. Chemsex-Related Risk Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: Profiling and Mapping Psychological Vulnerability Over Time. "We Do This Work Together": Stigma Negotiation and Resistance in the Lives of Male Sex Workers Who Perform Sex Work Online in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1