Development and validation of the conscientious objection in nursing care scale: a methodological study.

IF 2 Q2 NURSING Journal of Research in Nursing Pub Date : 2026-04-09 DOI:10.1177/17449871261426942
Simay Sirma, Esra Akin
{"title":"Development and validation of the conscientious objection in nursing care scale: a methodological study.","authors":"Simay Sirma, Esra Akin","doi":"10.1177/17449871261426942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conscientious objection in nursing care represents a critical ethical dilemma that undermines nurses' moral integrity and causes moral distress. The resulting internal conflict between professional responsibilities and personal values places a substantial emotional and ethical burden on nurses, potentially intensifying feelings of guilt and inadequacy and leading to conscience-related stress.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a scale for assessing conscientious objection in nursing care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Psychometric analyses were conducted with 165 nurses working in clinical and intensive care units of a university hospital in Türkiye. Exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing, and thematic analysis of open-ended questions using MAXQDA were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final scale comprised 20 items across four factors: conscientious practice, conscientious stress, conscientious sensitivity, and conscientious perception - explaining 59.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.710 to 0.863 for subscales and 0.887 for the total scale. Thematic analysis also revealed three main themes regarding conscientious objection: refusal of situations that conflict with their value systems, conscientious conflict, and deviation from conscientious values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Conscientious Objection in Nursing Care Scale' (COSINC) is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating nurses' attitudes and tendencies towards conscientious objection. By contributing to the consideration of ethical decision-making processes in clinical practice, the scale can support the development of institutional policies and practices regarding conscience-based ethical issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871261426942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13065640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871261426942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Conscientious objection in nursing care represents a critical ethical dilemma that undermines nurses' moral integrity and causes moral distress. The resulting internal conflict between professional responsibilities and personal values places a substantial emotional and ethical burden on nurses, potentially intensifying feelings of guilt and inadequacy and leading to conscience-related stress.

Aim: This study aimed to develop and validate a scale for assessing conscientious objection in nursing care.

Methods: Psychometric analyses were conducted with 165 nurses working in clinical and intensive care units of a university hospital in Türkiye. Exploratory factor analysis, reliability testing, and thematic analysis of open-ended questions using MAXQDA were performed.

Results: The final scale comprised 20 items across four factors: conscientious practice, conscientious stress, conscientious sensitivity, and conscientious perception - explaining 59.4% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.710 to 0.863 for subscales and 0.887 for the total scale. Thematic analysis also revealed three main themes regarding conscientious objection: refusal of situations that conflict with their value systems, conscientious conflict, and deviation from conscientious values.

Conclusion: The Conscientious Objection in Nursing Care Scale' (COSINC) is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating nurses' attitudes and tendencies towards conscientious objection. By contributing to the consideration of ethical decision-making processes in clinical practice, the scale can support the development of institutional policies and practices regarding conscience-based ethical issues.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理量表中良心反对的发展与验证:一项方法学研究。
背景:护理中的良心拒服兵役是一种严重的伦理困境,它破坏了护士的道德操守并导致道德困境。由此产生的职业责任和个人价值观之间的内部冲突给护士带来了巨大的情感和道德负担,潜在地加剧了内疚感和不足感,并导致与良心有关的压力。目的:本研究旨在开发并验证一个评估护理中良心拒服兵役的量表。方法:对浙江省某大学附属医院临床及重症监护室的165名护士进行心理测量分析。运用MAXQDA对开放性问题进行探索性因子分析、信度检验和专题分析。结果:最终量表包括20个项目,涉及4个因素:尽责实践、尽责压力、尽责敏感和尽责感知,解释了总方差的59.4%。子量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.710 ~ 0.863,总量表的Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.887。专题分析还揭示了良心反对的三个主要主题:拒绝与他们的价值体系相冲突的情况、良心冲突和偏离良心价值观。结论:《护理中的良心拒服兵役量表》(COSINC)是评估护士对良心拒服兵役态度和倾向的有效、可靠的工具。通过促进临床实践中伦理决策过程的考虑,该量表可以支持有关基于良心的伦理问题的制度政策和实践的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
期刊最新文献
Embedding reflective practice in competency development to provide learner-centred assessment. Nursing champions to promote evidence-based in-hospital sleep: a qualitative descriptive study. Learning for nurses from a cross-sectional quantitative analysis of youth engagement in an emergency department-based violence reduction scheme. Promoting healthy lifestyle behaviours in child and adolescent mental healthcare: reflections from a collaborative nursing and psychology initiative. Commentary: Implementing project-based learning in community health nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1