Bilateral External Rotation Torque CT Remains Reliable in Syndesmotic Assessment Despite Lateral Ligament Injury, but Reveals Increased Tibiotalar Rotational Instability.

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2026-05-14 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1177/24730114261443310
Pascal R Furrer, Jeroen Grigioni, Anna-Katharina Calek, Lukas Comolli, Arnd F Viehöfer, Jess G Snedeker, Stephan H Wirth, Silvan Beeler
{"title":"Bilateral External Rotation Torque CT Remains Reliable in Syndesmotic Assessment Despite Lateral Ligament Injury, but Reveals Increased Tibiotalar Rotational Instability.","authors":"Pascal R Furrer, Jeroen Grigioni, Anna-Katharina Calek, Lukas Comolli, Arnd F Viehöfer, Jess G Snedeker, Stephan H Wirth, Silvan Beeler","doi":"10.1177/24730114261443310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding syndesmotic injury in conjunction with lateral ligament disruption is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Although the influence of deltoid ligament injury on syndesmotic evaluation during bilateral external torque computed tomography (BET-CT) has been examined, the effect of concurrent lateral ligament lesion remains unclear and is rarely examined in the literature. This leads to the question of whether a lateral ligament lesion influences the previously established measurement parameters of syndesmosis instability in BET-CT and whether it results in a quantifiable increase in tibiotalar instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven paired cadaveric lower limbs (n = 14; mean age 78.6 years) with pre-existing iatrogenic syndesmotic transection underwent sequential lateral ligament sectioning: anterior talofibular (ATFL), calcaneofibular (CFL), and posterior talofibular ligaments (PTFL). BET-CT imaging was performed under applied external rotation torques of 0, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 Nm. Outcome measurements included the anterior tibiofibular distance, tibiofibular clear space, posterior tibiofibular distance, medial tibiotalar gutter angle, and lateral fibulotalar gutter angle for each ligament condition and torque level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The anterior tibiofibular distance remained stable despite progressive lateral ligament dissection and increasing torque (<i>P</i> > .05). Tibiofibular clear space and posterior distance measurements showed inconsistent trends and did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, the medial tibiotalar gutter angle increased significantly from 22.9° in isolated syndesmotic injury to 27.6° (±6.3°) following complete disruption of the lateral complex (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent lateral ligament injury does not impair the assessment of syndesmotic widening in BET-CT, as tibiofibular alignment remains preserved. However, disruption of the lateral complex exacerbates rotational tibiotalar instability.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>In this cadaveric model, BET-CT remains reliable for assessing syndesmotic lesions even in the presence of lateral ligament injury. However, the increase in rotational tibiotalar instability with combined injuries highlights the need for comprehensive evaluation of ankle ligament injuries, pending clinical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12429,"journal":{"name":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","volume":"11 2","pages":"24730114261443310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13180089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114261443310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding syndesmotic injury in conjunction with lateral ligament disruption is essential for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Although the influence of deltoid ligament injury on syndesmotic evaluation during bilateral external torque computed tomography (BET-CT) has been examined, the effect of concurrent lateral ligament lesion remains unclear and is rarely examined in the literature. This leads to the question of whether a lateral ligament lesion influences the previously established measurement parameters of syndesmosis instability in BET-CT and whether it results in a quantifiable increase in tibiotalar instability.

Methods: Seven paired cadaveric lower limbs (n = 14; mean age 78.6 years) with pre-existing iatrogenic syndesmotic transection underwent sequential lateral ligament sectioning: anterior talofibular (ATFL), calcaneofibular (CFL), and posterior talofibular ligaments (PTFL). BET-CT imaging was performed under applied external rotation torques of 0, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 Nm. Outcome measurements included the anterior tibiofibular distance, tibiofibular clear space, posterior tibiofibular distance, medial tibiotalar gutter angle, and lateral fibulotalar gutter angle for each ligament condition and torque level.

Results: The anterior tibiofibular distance remained stable despite progressive lateral ligament dissection and increasing torque (P > .05). Tibiofibular clear space and posterior distance measurements showed inconsistent trends and did not reach statistical significance. In contrast, the medial tibiotalar gutter angle increased significantly from 22.9° in isolated syndesmotic injury to 27.6° (±6.3°) following complete disruption of the lateral complex (P < .001).

Conclusion: Concurrent lateral ligament injury does not impair the assessment of syndesmotic widening in BET-CT, as tibiofibular alignment remains preserved. However, disruption of the lateral complex exacerbates rotational tibiotalar instability.

Clinical relevance: In this cadaveric model, BET-CT remains reliable for assessing syndesmotic lesions even in the presence of lateral ligament injury. However, the increase in rotational tibiotalar instability with combined injuries highlights the need for comprehensive evaluation of ankle ligament injuries, pending clinical validation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尽管外侧韧带损伤,但双侧外旋扭矩CT在关节联合评估中仍然可靠,但显示胫距旋转不稳定性增加。
背景:了解韧带联合损伤与外侧韧带断裂是准确诊断和治疗的必要条件。虽然已经研究了三角韧带损伤对双侧外扭矩计算机断层扫描(beta - ct)中韧带联合评价的影响,但并发侧韧带损伤的影响尚不清楚,文献中很少研究。这就引出了一个问题,即外侧韧带病变是否会影响先前在BET-CT中建立的韧带联合不稳定性测量参数,以及它是否会导致可量化的胫腓不稳定性增加。方法:7对尸体下肢(n = 14,平均年龄78.6岁)先前存在医源性韧带联合横断,进行了顺序外侧韧带切片:距腓骨前韧带(ATFL),跟腓骨(CFL)和距腓骨后韧带(PTFL)。在施加0、2.5、5.0和7.5 Nm的外部旋转扭矩下进行BET-CT成像。结果测量包括每个韧带状态和扭矩水平的胫腓骨前距离、胫腓骨间隙、胫腓骨后距离、胫距内侧沟角和胫距外侧沟角。结果:胫腓骨前距在进行性外侧韧带剥离和扭矩增加的情况下保持稳定(P < 0.05)。胫腓骨间隙和后距测量结果不一致,无统计学意义。相比之下,外侧复合体完全断裂后,胫骨内侧沟角从孤立性韧带联合损伤时的22.9°显著增加到27.6°(±6.3°)(P结论:并发外侧韧带损伤不会影响β - ct对韧带联合增宽的评估,因为胫腓骨对齐仍然保留。然而,外侧复合体的破坏加剧了旋转胫距不稳定。临床相关性:在这个尸体模型中,即使存在外侧韧带损伤,BET-CT仍然可以可靠地评估韧带联合病变。然而,合并损伤的旋转胫距不稳定的增加强调了对踝关节韧带损伤进行综合评估的必要性,有待临床验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1152
期刊最新文献
High Accuracy, Questionable References: Large Language Models' Performance and Citation Reliability in Foot and Ankle Surgery Examinations. Donor Site Morbidity After Talar Mosaicplasty: Arthroscopic Medial Femoral Condyle vs Mini-Open Lateral Femoral Condyle Harvesting. Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) Repair With vs Without Bio-inductive Scaffold Augmentation for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study. Congenital Anomaly of the Peroneus Brevis Tendon With a Bifid Digastric Variant Lacking Insertion on the Fifth Metatarsal Base: A Case Report. Return to Sport After Excision of Os Trigonum of Talus in Athletes.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1