Neuropsychological functioning in clinically referred patients with sarcoidosis: a preliminary investigation.

Rachel Galioto, Jeffrey Lambe, Urja Bhatia, Kaltra Dhima, Eileen Galvani, Tasha Rhoads, Brandon Moss, Lilah Fienberg, Daniel A Culver, Amy Kunchok
{"title":"Neuropsychological functioning in clinically referred patients with sarcoidosis: a preliminary investigation.","authors":"Rachel Galioto, Jeffrey Lambe, Urja Bhatia, Kaltra Dhima, Eileen Galvani, Tasha Rhoads, Brandon Moss, Lilah Fienberg, Daniel A Culver, Amy Kunchok","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acag042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive complaints are common among individuals with sarcoidosis, though little is known about objective cognitive performance in this group. This study examined performance on neuropsychological testing in patients with sarcoidosis who had subjective cognitive complaints, comparing performance between individuals with and without neurologic involvement (i.e., neurosarcoidosis [NS]).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a retrospective, observational study of individuals with sarcoidosis who were referred for neuropsychological evaluation due to cognitive complaints. Mean test performances and rates of impairment on cognitive tests were examined and compared between individuals with NS and systemic sarcoidosis (SS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven individuals with sarcoidosis (n = 14 with NS) were included (Mage = 53.2 ± 10.0 years, Meducation = 14.5 ± 2.4 years, 83.8% White, 67.6% female), of whom 40.5% demonstrated cognitive impairment (CI; 2+ tests impaired). Impairments were most common on tests of verbal memory (24.2% immediate, 33.3% delayed), problem solving (25.8%), and verbal fluency (22.6%). All but one of the individuals with CI in the NS group had intracranial involvement. The main difference observed between NS and SS was worse performance on a measure of auditory attention/working memory, t(35) = -2.24, p = .03.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CI was observed in nearly half of patients with sarcoidosis who had subjective cognitive complaints. Additional research is needed to better understand the potential physiological underpinnings.</p>","PeriodicalId":520564,"journal":{"name":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","volume":"41 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acag042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive complaints are common among individuals with sarcoidosis, though little is known about objective cognitive performance in this group. This study examined performance on neuropsychological testing in patients with sarcoidosis who had subjective cognitive complaints, comparing performance between individuals with and without neurologic involvement (i.e., neurosarcoidosis [NS]).

Method: This is a retrospective, observational study of individuals with sarcoidosis who were referred for neuropsychological evaluation due to cognitive complaints. Mean test performances and rates of impairment on cognitive tests were examined and compared between individuals with NS and systemic sarcoidosis (SS).

Results: Thirty-seven individuals with sarcoidosis (n = 14 with NS) were included (Mage = 53.2 ± 10.0 years, Meducation = 14.5 ± 2.4 years, 83.8% White, 67.6% female), of whom 40.5% demonstrated cognitive impairment (CI; 2+ tests impaired). Impairments were most common on tests of verbal memory (24.2% immediate, 33.3% delayed), problem solving (25.8%), and verbal fluency (22.6%). All but one of the individuals with CI in the NS group had intracranial involvement. The main difference observed between NS and SS was worse performance on a measure of auditory attention/working memory, t(35) = -2.24, p = .03.

Conclusions: CI was observed in nearly half of patients with sarcoidosis who had subjective cognitive complaints. Additional research is needed to better understand the potential physiological underpinnings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结节病临床转诊患者的神经心理功能:初步调查。
目的:结节病患者的认知能力抱怨很常见,但对该组患者的客观认知表现知之甚少。本研究考察了有主观认知主诉的结节病患者在神经心理测试中的表现,比较了有无神经系统受累(即神经结节病[NS])患者的表现。方法:这是一项回顾性的观察性研究,结节病患者因认知障碍而接受神经心理学评估。研究了NS和系统性结节病(SS)患者在认知测试中的平均测试表现和损害率。结果:纳入37例结节病患者(n = 14伴NS)(年龄= 53.2±10.0岁,教育= 14.5±2.4岁,白人占83.8%,女性占67.6%),其中40.5%表现为认知障碍(CI; 2+测试受损)。损伤在言语记忆(24.2%即时,33.3%延迟)、解决问题(25.8%)和语言流畅性(22.6%)测试中最常见。NS组CI患者除一人外均有颅内受累。观察到的NS和SS之间的主要差异是在听觉注意/工作记忆的测量上表现较差,t(35) = -2.24, p = .03。结论:近一半的结节病患者存在主观认知主诉。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解潜在的生理基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The social behavioral phenotype of Kabuki syndrome. Telephone-based Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised as a pre-screening tool for identifying SuperAgers. Validation of the English Proficiency Questionnaire in professional hockey players. Is there evidence for additive neurocognitive deficits in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and co-occurring conditions? Spaced retrieval practice improves the uptake of and intention to use personal neuropsychological assessment feedback: a randomized cognitive experiment in a sample of older black and white veterans.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1