Geographic Disparities in Board-Certified Ambulatory Care Pharmacists in Appalachia.

Carolina Davis, Rick Hess
{"title":"Geographic Disparities in Board-Certified Ambulatory Care Pharmacists in Appalachia.","authors":"Carolina Davis, Rick Hess","doi":"10.1016/j.japh.2026.103473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Appalachian region experiences persistent health disparities and limited access to health care services. Ambulatory care pharmacists, including Board-Certified Ambulatory Care Pharmacists (BCACPs), can help address these gaps, but their distribution in Appalachia is not well described.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the distribution and population density of BCACPs in the United States, the Appalachian region, and rural Appalachian counties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS) and the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC). BCACP data, including ZIP codes, were obtained from the BPS registry in August 2025. Counties were classified as Appalachian and further categorized as rural or non-rural using ARC definitions. BCACP density per 1,000,000 residents was calculated and compared across regions. Rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Poisson regression, with U.S. density as the reference.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BCACP density was lower in the Appalachian region compared to the United States overall and was lowest in rural Appalachian counties. Compared with the national BCACP density, the BCACP rate was 24% lower in Appalachia (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.85; P < 0.001) and 73% lower in rural Appalachian counties (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.47; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCACPs are underrepresented in Appalachia, highlighting a gap in access to specialized ambulatory care services. Addressing this gap will require targeted recruitment and retention strategies, including early pipeline development, financial incentives such as loan forgiveness, and ensuring practice sites are ready to support pharmacist integration. Expanding access to ambulatory care pharmacists may help improve care delivery and reduce health disparities in these communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":520694,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA","volume":" ","pages":"103473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2026.103473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Appalachian region experiences persistent health disparities and limited access to health care services. Ambulatory care pharmacists, including Board-Certified Ambulatory Care Pharmacists (BCACPs), can help address these gaps, but their distribution in Appalachia is not well described.

Objective: To evaluate the distribution and population density of BCACPs in the United States, the Appalachian region, and rural Appalachian counties.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the Board of Pharmacy Specialties (BPS) and the Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC). BCACP data, including ZIP codes, were obtained from the BPS registry in August 2025. Counties were classified as Appalachian and further categorized as rural or non-rural using ARC definitions. BCACP density per 1,000,000 residents was calculated and compared across regions. Rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Poisson regression, with U.S. density as the reference.

Results: BCACP density was lower in the Appalachian region compared to the United States overall and was lowest in rural Appalachian counties. Compared with the national BCACP density, the BCACP rate was 24% lower in Appalachia (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.85; P < 0.001) and 73% lower in rural Appalachian counties (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.47; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: BCACPs are underrepresented in Appalachia, highlighting a gap in access to specialized ambulatory care services. Addressing this gap will require targeted recruitment and retention strategies, including early pipeline development, financial incentives such as loan forgiveness, and ensuring practice sites are ready to support pharmacist integration. Expanding access to ambulatory care pharmacists may help improve care delivery and reduce health disparities in these communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在阿巴拉契亚董事会认证的门诊护理药剂师的地理差异。
背景:阿巴拉契亚地区经历了持续的健康差距和有限的获得医疗保健服务。流动护理药剂师,包括委员会认证的流动护理药剂师(bacps),可以帮助解决这些差距,但他们在阿巴拉契亚地区的分布没有很好的描述。目的:评价美国、阿巴拉契亚地区和农村阿巴拉契亚县baccp的分布和人口密度。方法:这项横断面研究使用了药学专业委员会(BPS)和阿巴拉契亚地区委员会(ARC)公开提供的数据。bacp数据,包括邮政编码,于2025年8月从BPS登记处获得。县被划分为阿巴拉契亚地区,并根据ARC的定义进一步划分为农村或非农村。计算并比较了各地区每100万居民的baccp密度。以美国密度为参考,采用泊松回归计算95%置信区间(CI)的发生率比(RR)。结果:与美国整体相比,阿巴拉契亚地区的baccp密度较低,在阿巴拉契亚农村县最低。与全国baccp密度相比,阿巴拉契亚地区baccp发生率低24% (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.85)。结论:阿巴拉契亚地区baccp的代表性不足,凸显了在获得专业门诊服务方面的差距。解决这一差距需要有针对性的招聘和保留战略,包括早期管道开发、贷款减免等财政激励措施,以及确保实践场所准备好支持药剂师整合。扩大获得流动护理药剂师可能有助于改善护理服务和减少这些社区的健康差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drone-supported medication delivery as a rural pharmacy access strategy: A scoping review of logistics, regulation, and pharmacist integration. Descriptive analysis of pharmacy closures and openings in the United States from 2022-2024. Effectiveness of Pharmaceutical Care in Reducing the Incidence of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-related Pneumonitis in Patients with NSCLC: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Mapping pharmacist roles across the chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy care continuum: A scoping review. Hispanic pharmacy students' perspectives on institutional policies requiring certified Spanish interpreters: A qualitative study.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1