Lexical Elaboration and Intentional Vocabulary Acquisition: An Eye-Tracking Study.

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Eye Movement Research Pub Date : 2026-06-01 DOI:10.3390/jemr19030061
Taegang Lee, Byeongchae Choi, Sungmook Choi, Soo-Ok Kweon
{"title":"Lexical Elaboration and Intentional Vocabulary Acquisition: An Eye-Tracking Study.","authors":"Taegang Lee, Byeongchae Choi, Sungmook Choi, Soo-Ok Kweon","doi":"10.3390/jemr19030061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research on lexical elaboration (providing additional information about unfamiliar words) has yielded non-significant effects on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Building on this, the present study used eye-tracking technology to examine whether similar results replicate under intentional learning conditions. Participants were Korean undergraduate students (<i>N</i> = 67) who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: baseline, unenhanced elaboration, or enhanced elaboration. They were instructed to read an English text twice while their eye movements were recorded. After reading, they responded to two forewarned vocabulary assessments measuring form and meaning recall. Overall, the unenhanced elaboration group exhibited distinct target-word processing patterns and higher meaning recall performance compared to the baseline group, whereas the enhanced elaboration group's outcomes were comparable to the baseline group. For instance, generalized linear mixed-effects modeling (GLMM) revealed that while the unenhanced elaboration group maintained stable reading times on target words across the two readings, the baseline and enhanced elaboration groups exhibited significant reductions. Furthermore, only the unenhanced elaboration group significantly outperformed the baseline group in meaning recall. Collectively, our findings suggest that lexical elaboration, particularly without input enhancement, may facilitate vocabulary acquisition under intentional learning conditions by promoting more sustained attention to unfamiliar words.</p>","PeriodicalId":15813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","volume":"19 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13301564/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19030061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prior research on lexical elaboration (providing additional information about unfamiliar words) has yielded non-significant effects on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Building on this, the present study used eye-tracking technology to examine whether similar results replicate under intentional learning conditions. Participants were Korean undergraduate students (N = 67) who were randomly assigned to one of three groups: baseline, unenhanced elaboration, or enhanced elaboration. They were instructed to read an English text twice while their eye movements were recorded. After reading, they responded to two forewarned vocabulary assessments measuring form and meaning recall. Overall, the unenhanced elaboration group exhibited distinct target-word processing patterns and higher meaning recall performance compared to the baseline group, whereas the enhanced elaboration group's outcomes were comparable to the baseline group. For instance, generalized linear mixed-effects modeling (GLMM) revealed that while the unenhanced elaboration group maintained stable reading times on target words across the two readings, the baseline and enhanced elaboration groups exhibited significant reductions. Furthermore, only the unenhanced elaboration group significantly outperformed the baseline group in meaning recall. Collectively, our findings suggest that lexical elaboration, particularly without input enhancement, may facilitate vocabulary acquisition under intentional learning conditions by promoting more sustained attention to unfamiliar words.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
词汇细化与意向词汇习得:一项眼动追踪研究。
词汇细化(提供不熟悉词汇的额外信息)对附带词汇习得的影响并不显著。在此基础上,本研究使用眼动追踪技术来检查在有意识的学习条件下是否会重复类似的结果。参与者是韩国本科生(N = 67),他们被随机分配到三组中的一组:基线组、非强化细化组和强化细化组。他们被要求读两遍英语课文,同时记录下他们的眼球运动。阅读后,他们对两项预先警告的词汇评估做出反应,测量形式和意义回忆。总体而言,与基线组相比,未经强化的精细化组表现出不同的目标词处理模式和更高的意义回忆性能,而强化的精细化组的结果与基线组相当。例如,广义线性混合效应模型(GLMM)显示,虽然未经强化的精读组在两次阅读中保持稳定的目标单词阅读时间,但基线组和强化精读组的阅读时间明显减少。此外,只有未强化的阐述组在意义回忆上显著优于基线组。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,词汇细化,特别是没有输入增强的情况下,可以通过促进对不熟悉单词的更持久的注意,促进有意学习条件下的词汇习得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eye Movement Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific periodical devoted to all aspects of oculomotor functioning including methodology of eye recording, neurophysiological and cognitive models, attention, reading, as well as applications in neurology, ergonomy, media research and other areas,
期刊最新文献
Composite Multi-Stage Transfer Learning with Cross-Scene Adaptation for Personalized In-Vehicle Gaze Estimation. Visual Attention and Hostile Media Perception in TikTok War News: An Eye-Tracking Study of Korean and Chinese Viewers. Reading Conflicting Socio-Scientific Issue Texts: Visual and Post-Reading Myside Bias. Far-Field Non-Contact Eye Tracking for Visual Attention Analysis in Runway Viewing Environments. From Pattern Recognition to Abstract Representation: Visual Search and Neural Mechanisms of Structured Pattern Processing in Skilled Basketball Players.
wanfang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1